Go Back   Home > Forums > Amplifiers > Tubes / Valves
Home Forums Rules Articles Store Gallery Blogs Register Donations FAQ Calendar Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read

Tubes / Valves All about our sweet vacuum tubes :) Threads about Musical Instrument Amps of all kinds should be in the Instruments & Amps forum

Please consider donating to help us continue to serve you.

Ads on/off / Custom Title / More PMs / More album space / Advanced printing & mass image saving
Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 30th August 2010, 10:07 PM   #1
tinitus is online now tinitus  Europe
diyAudio Moderator
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Default ecc99 - 6C19n PP, (6S19P)

Hey, I bought a bunch of 6C19N, to get started

ECC99 seem to match as driver

Should I use SE or PP driver stage

Interstage trafo could be coupled for 1:2 gain with SE to PP configuration
With PP to PP configuration only 1:1 seems possible

I could consider a line trafo, but those are expencive


Would nice with some input on this
Attached Images
File Type: gif ECC99 - 6C19n PP revintage.GIF (10.2 KB, 1511 views)
File Type: gif ECC99 - 6C19n SE-PP.GIF (10.0 KB, 1451 views)
  Reply With Quote
Old 30th August 2010, 10:18 PM   #2
diyAudio Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2010
Don't know if this is in any way helpful, but I have a preamplifier using the ECC99. The first half of the tube is used as as common cathode amplifier with a constant current source on the anode, and the second half is a DC-connected cathode follower, again with a CCS. I get something like 56 volts peak to peak with 0.15% distortion and a bandwidth up to 450 kHz (-3dB) from a B+ around 300 volts. I think it could be optimized further, still. The amplification is around the tubes µ ~ 20.
  Reply With Quote
Old 30th August 2010, 10:22 PM   #3
tinitus is online now tinitus  Europe
diyAudio Moderator
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
6C19N tubes

not really sure why I bought them, I just did

please dont suggest OTL; I want these to last a long time
Attached Images
File Type: jpg IMG_1036 (Large).JPG (62.2 KB, 1406 views)
File Type: jpg IMG_1039 (Large).JPG (77.3 KB, 1341 views)
File Type: jpg IMG_1041 (Large).JPG (56.9 KB, 1298 views)
  Reply With Quote
Old 30th August 2010, 10:36 PM   #4
JLH is offline JLH  United States
diyAudio Member
 
JLH's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Indianapolis, IN
Quote:
Originally Posted by tinitus View Post
6C19N tubes

not really sure why I bought them, I just did
Maybe you needed to weld something

http://www.mif.pg.gda.pl/homepages/f...13/6/6S19P.pdf

Looks like a Mu of 2 with a Rp of 600 ohms. You could drive just about anything with those things, even with a step up transformer. Mr. Miller doesn't have a chance with that low Rp.
__________________
Ah, how beautifully the orchestra sounds before a rain! In a dry sunny day there is no way for the instruments to sound this way!
  Reply With Quote
Old 1st September 2010, 12:03 AM   #5
tinitus is online now tinitus  Europe
diyAudio Moderator
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
hey, I found this

input/driver stage looks different from most I have seen, but what is it
Attached Images
File Type: png 71Aamp1 (Large).png (142.7 KB, 817 views)
  Reply With Quote
Old 1st September 2010, 12:21 AM   #6
tinitus is online now tinitus  Europe
diyAudio Moderator
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
hmmm maybe a mix, with interstage, looks obvious to me, but is it

does it make any sense at all
Attached Images
File Type: gif ECC99 - 6C19n PP new.GIF (11.8 KB, 703 views)
  Reply With Quote
Old 1st September 2010, 06:41 AM   #7
tinitus is online now tinitus  Europe
diyAudio Moderator
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
ahh, maybe a kind of SRPP
better forget that one

Its my understanding that adding some negative or positive bias voltage is lowering bias current, to make tube run cooler
And I dont think thats needed here

I dont know if it makes any sense to use another driver tube
maybe something with biasing the second driver stage driving the IT ?

Im not sure about CCS on first driver stage B+
I read that it puts hard load on supply

any opinions ?
Attached Images
File Type: gif ECC99 - 6C19n PP revintage.GIF (8.3 KB, 363 views)
File Type: gif ECC99 - 6C19n PP revintage ex.GIF (10.0 KB, 235 views)
  Reply With Quote
Old 1st September 2010, 08:15 AM   #8
diyAudio Member
 
Join Date: May 2007
Quote:
Originally Posted by tinitus View Post
ahh, maybe a kind of SRPP
better forget that one

Its my understanding that adding some negative or positive bias voltage is lowering bias current, to make tube run cooler
And I dont think thats needed here

I dont know if it makes any sense to use another driver tube
maybe something with biasing the second driver stage driving the IT ?

Im not sure about CCS on first driver stage B+
I read that it puts hard load on supply

any opinions ?
That won´t work! About #1 you must have a CCS-tail and -supply with unbalanced in. Skip #2!

Last edited by revintage; 1st September 2010 at 08:21 AM.
  Reply With Quote
Old 1st September 2010, 08:24 AM   #9
piano3 is offline piano3  United Kingdom
diyAudio Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2010
Location: London,UK
I am building a 6S19P PP at the moment. The driver I am using has a gain of about 35 and my preamp has a very high output-more than 2 volts. ECC99 seems a little marginal in gain as the 6S19P has a mu of only 2 although you could use an input step up xformer as the phase splitter. It would be less expensive than an interstage one I would expect.If I was using a single ended preamp I would probably use a triode connected EF184 differential pair phase splitter with a constant current sink. The gain of this is about 60 and this valve is very linear triode connected.
  Reply With Quote
Old 1st September 2010, 09:38 AM   #10
tinitus is online now tinitus  Europe
diyAudio Moderator
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Quote:
Originally Posted by piano3 View Post
I am building a 6S19P PP at the moment.
hey piano man, you are welcome to post your results here, or anything related

yeah, I may end up with flea power due to lack of gain

do you know what kind of power to expect from PP 6C19, with optimal gain stage ?
I am told that 6C19 is less good in SE, but much better in PP
  Reply With Quote

Reply


Hide this!Advertise here!
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
OTL with 6S19P? Ryssen Tubes / Valves 21 17th September 2010 10:53 AM
6N23P, 6S19P anybody knows? lineup Tubes / Valves 8 11th September 2008 09:41 AM
My 6S19P Linestage sorenj07 Tubes / Valves 4 12th April 2008 06:21 PM
6S19P Amplifier sorenj07 Tubes / Valves 28 14th October 2007 08:05 AM
6S19P budget SE. sorenj07 Tubes / Valves 5 13th October 2007 02:41 PM


New To Site? Need Help?

All times are GMT. The time now is 04:41 AM.


vBulletin Optimisation provided by vB Optimise (Pro) - vBulletin Mods & Addons Copyright © 2013 DragonByte Technologies Ltd. (Resources saved on this page: MySQL 27.27%)
Copyright ©1999-2013 diyAudio