|
|
|||||||
| Home | Forums | Rules | Articles | Store | Gallery | Blogs | Register | Donations | FAQ | Calendar | Search | Today's Posts | Mark Forums Read | Search |
| Tubes / Valves All about our sweet vacuum tubes :) Threads about Musical Instrument Amps of all kinds should be in the Instruments & Amps forum |
| diyAudio Sponsor | ||
|
|
||
|
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|
#1 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Aug 2010
|
Hello everyone, a forum newbie here.
I've been designing an EL34 SIPP-amp, and since I've zero experience on the sound of small signal pentodes, plus I need ample gain and swing, I decided to try pentode input just for the fun of it. Now I'd like to hear your opinions on which one to use: I have loads of E83F, EF184, E180F and E810F laying around. Which one of these would be the best? I'm looking for Av round 50 and a swing of 140Vpp from a 300 V B+. I already was given a strong opinion in favor of the E83F by a person much wiser than me, and have drawn a circuit for that, but I'm still open for suggestions. |
|
|
|
|
#2 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: May 2007
|
If the E83F is anything like the EF83 then it is variable-mu so will give you lots of second-order distortion with anything other than a very small input.
A pentode is likely to give you too much gain. If you reduce the load resistor to reduce the gain then you may have insufficient swing. The valves you have listed are quite different from each other, as they are intended for different purposes. |
|
|
|
|
#3 | ||
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Aug 2010
|
Quote:
Quote:
My idea is that using a pentode the input capacitance would be kept lower than with triodes. I could easily get the gain from a 12AX7, but then I'd have more input capacitance after the volume pot. If I use a cathode follower after the pentode, I should have very fast rise times throughout the amplifier, which is a concept I want to maintain in this design. Just for the fun of it. |
||
|
|
|
|
#4 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: Calgary, Alberta
|
Doesn't look like a very sharp cutoff to me:
__________________
Aerodynamics are for people who can't build engines. Enzo Ferrari |
|
|
|
|
#5 |
|
diyAudio Member
|
I would prefer 6J51P, 6J52P, 6J53P depending on amplification factor you need.
6J51P is analog of EF184
__________________
The devil is not so terrible as his mathematical model! Wavebourn: We Create Creativity! |
|
|
|
|
#6 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Budapest
|
D3a (or E810F), cascode CCS (DN2540), LED bias. Au=50 .
THD at 142 Vpp 0.37%. Last edited by euro21; 30th August 2010 at 09:54 PM. |
|
|
|
|
#7 |
|
diyAudio Member
|
That looks quite typical of a sharp cutoff. If it were remote, the lowest grid voltage would be 10 or 20V, not 5.
As for pentodes, I'm partial to 6U8, 6GH8, etc. There are some particularly excellent ones, including frame grids (ECF801?). Cheap, plentiful, and quite handy. Pentode gain + triode cathodyne makes a lovely 6V6 PP amp. Bit of a stretch for 6L6, but quite doable. Not quite enough gain for NFB, you'll need a preamp to get away with it. Or use two, of whatever type has the low-mu triode, for gain + LTP + CCS. You can drive quad 6L6s, sweeps, etc. Plenty of gain for NFB. BTW, don't be afraid of common cathode combos (6X8, etc.). They make quite excellent LTPs, DC coupled amps, etc. Break with tradition, dare to be different... Tim
__________________
See my Electronics webpage -- the home of Vacuum Tube Drag Racing. The key to being a successful Audiophile: "I reject your reality and substitute my own!" |
|
|
|
|
#8 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Aug 2010
|
Wavebourn, I've considered the EF184 also. It would give more gain, which could of course be lowered by local feedback, as I'm also considering with the E83F.
euro21, those results look very good indeed. A nice thing is I have a handful of Siemens E810F in my closet! I'm trying to get away with tubes I have. That's why I asked for preferences on the list I gave. I could find more prospective tube candidates from my "small" stash (about 2 cubic meters), but that might complicate things too much... I already did a quick'n'dirty E55L spud with tubes found from my stash, and it's currently commanding my open baffles, even though I originally made it as a one evening joke build. Joke was on me, it sounds quite good... |
|
|
|
|
#9 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Aug 2009
|
Hey,
I also did some experiments with EF184 valves, they are strong enough to drive a triode strapped PL36 valve ( 6,8W RMS Output @ 8ohm load ). I was just wondering if the russian equivalents are worth the money, in Germany EF184 are quite hard to find ( ebay offers horrible prices ). I might try to buy some russian 6j51p since I´m quite satisfied with my results. Best regards, George |
|
|
|
|
#10 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Aug 2007
|
euro21, is this real (tested with music
If yes, do you have any problems with DN2540? Thanks. |
|
|
| Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|
|
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| IC with SPDIF input to USB or 1394 (or with HDMI input for audio stream) | VickHard | Digital Source | 2 | 26th March 2010 02:17 AM |
| a better pentode for less! | smoking-amp | Tubes / Valves | 16 | 12th August 2008 01:58 AM |
| Using a Grid Choke On the 2A3 when the input/driver is a Pentode? | sgerus | Tubes / Valves | 3 | 25th February 2008 11:44 PM |
| HELP: BJT input op-amp's input bias current compensation | frickecello | Solid State | 6 | 19th June 2007 12:00 AM |
| A small no-fuss pentode/pentode SE amp | Tubes4e4 | Tubes / Valves | 13 | 1st January 2006 05:16 AM |
| New To Site? | Need Help? |
| Page generated in 0.11839 seconds (79.42% PHP - 20.58% MySQL) with 11 queries |