|
|
|||||||
| Home | Forums | Rules | Articles | Store | Gallery | Blogs | Register | Donations | FAQ | Calendar | Search | Today's Posts | Mark Forums Read | Search |
| Tubes / Valves All about our sweet vacuum tubes :) Threads about Musical Instrument Amps of all kinds should be in the Instruments & Amps forum |
| diyAudio Sponsor | ||
|
|
||
|
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|
#1 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Jul 2008
|
First attempt at mu follower for headphone amp.
2 x 6N6P. Voltage on bottom anode is 100V - led bias at about 2.0V across it. 18-20mA?? top cathode has 120 ohm resistor (1.9V-16mA) follower by 10K with bootstrap of 220K. Small bypass cap connected to bottom anode. Turn is up a little a it distorts quite a bit. 32 ohm phones. For me the voltages and currents look ok. Strange. |
|
|
|
|
#2 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Aug 2010
Location: London,UK
|
32 ohms is a pretty impossible load for a valve. I think you would need a pretty special circuit with lots of feedback. Think about the problems of designing OTL amps.I think EC8010 probably knows a lot about this kind of thing judging from some of his posts.
|
|
|
|
|
#3 |
|
diyAudio Member
|
Matching transformer would be fine to add.
__________________
The devil is not so terrible as his mathematical model! Wavebourn: We Create Creativity! |
|
|
|
|
#4 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Jul 2008
|
Isn't 32 ohms the impedance of the smallest headphones??
Mt SRPP drove them really well. And I expect the 300 ohm phones such as Sennheiser. FYI- I have a 220uF output cap. |
|
|
|
|
#5 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: May 2007
Location: Eskilstuna, Sweden
|
If I understand your schematicless description right, you have a voltage drop of 160V over the 10k. So with 100V over the upper tube you need just over 350V B+. Do you have that?
__________________
Brgds Lars |
|
|
|
|
#6 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Jul 2008
|
I have 325V.
Where am I going wrong? Do I need to lower or increase the upper cathode resistor or the 10K plate resistor? The mu follower should have lower distortion than the SRPP. Last edited by Brit01; 25th August 2010 at 01:00 PM. |
|
|
|
|
#7 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: South Wales
|
I think that the load impedance you're trying to drive is way too low for that valve....
![]() 32 ohm is VERY low impedance for a 6N6p.... ![]() Try a higher impedance headphone, around 300 ohm.... Or you could replace the top valve with a MOSFET a la Allen Kimmel.... Last edited by Alastair E; 25th August 2010 at 02:50 PM. |
|
|
|
|
#8 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Jul 2008
|
Maybe I got confused with the load.
These phones are standard small headphones. Easiest to drive. 300?? Why does the SRPP with 6N6P's perform flawlessly? |
|
|
|
|
#9 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: South Wales
|
Hmm...
You say, 'small and easy to drive'.... What is the actual Impedance of these phones...? That type used fro MP3 players etc are usually below 50 ohms, and not a good load for any small Valve circuit! |
|
|
|
|
#10 | |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Jul 2008
|
Quote:
Big error on my behalf. I thought they were easier to drive. Come to think of impedance I couldn't have been so wrong. Yes small maxell phones. The SRPP worked great with them. Quite superb. Guess I'll go back to my original design. |
|
|
|
| Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|
|
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Cascoded mu-follower | jnb | Tubes / Valves | 5 | 9th September 2007 10:28 PM |
| 6DJ8/ECC88 mu-follower | SSassen | Tubes / Valves | 30 | 11th April 2007 08:19 PM |
| Distortion analysis mu follower | docali | Tubes / Valves | 12 | 7th April 2005 06:54 AM |
| Mu follower, headphone amp? | alk | Headphone Systems | 6 | 29th July 2004 04:23 AM |
| Mu-follower current capability? | Fuling | Tubes / Valves | 5 | 5th May 2004 10:37 AM |
| New To Site? | Need Help? |
| Page generated in 0.09015 seconds (86.61% PHP - 13.39% MySQL) with 10 queries |