|
|
|||||||
| Home | Forums | Rules | Articles | Store | Gallery | Blogs | Register | Donations | FAQ | Calendar | Search | Today's Posts | Mark Forums Read | Search |
| Tubes / Valves All about our sweet vacuum tubes :) Threads about Musical Instrument Amps of all kinds should be in the Instruments & Amps forum |
| diyAudio Sponsor | ||
|
|
||
|
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|
#1 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Feb 2009
|
There, a PCL84 PP monoblock schematic I've been wanting to try for quite some time now, the schematic somebody posted short while ago utilizing 100V line transformer as OPT reminded me of these plans. This shoud provide up to 3W (without driving tubes above suggested maximum dissipation line) with fairly conservative supply of 160V AC and 200 mV peak to peak input (70 mV RMS). It's supposed to serve as a guitar practice amplifier.
Now my question is: is the input sensitive enough for electric guitar pickups ? I've seen references stating that pickup coils will output anything from 100 mV upwards (I take this is meant as peak to peak value I'm going to use a 10W 100V OPT for output in class AB. PCL84/ECL84 tubes are just as cheap to buy as the OPT was so I designed this whole amplifier to be built only with easily affordable parts - aside from power transformer (I recycled it from another project) this thing shouldn't cost me more than 20 EUR ($30 USD) to build, and not more than 40 EUR ($50) with mains transformer(s) included. I also have some salvaged large diameter speakers which will fit perfectly into the box for series 8R load. I haven't decided on whether I really want to incorporate the UL/pentode switch (I might just pick one option after initial testing and dump the switch). If supply voltage was increased to 300V, more power (up to 4.5W) could be extracted without grossly violating those pentode sections. Comments welcome !
__________________
mod verb, transitive /mod/ to state that one is utterly clueless about the operation of device to be "modded" and into "fixing" things that are not broken; "My new amplifier sounds great so I want to mod it." |
|
|
|
|
#2 | |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Madrid
|
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
|
#3 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Feb 2009
|
I see. What kind of input sensitivity should I be aiming for (for maximum output swing) ? Noise will become an issue with insanely high amplification levels
![]() Yes, je plays hard rock (Metallica and the like). He has two guitars (and a bass guitar), but I won't have access to either until this is finished.
__________________
mod verb, transitive /mod/ to state that one is utterly clueless about the operation of device to be "modded" and into "fixing" things that are not broken; "My new amplifier sounds great so I want to mod it." |
|
|
|
|
#4 | |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Madrid
|
Quote:
Schematic Heaven. Where All Good Amp & Effect Designs Await Resurrection... |
|
|
|
|
|
#5 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Feb 2009
|
Both are humbuckers (double coils), I'm not sure about the bass guitar though.
Am I correct in assuming that humbuckers give twice the output swing of a single coil (due to series connection of both coils) with the additional benefit of common mode noise cancellation that they are mainly used for ? Hm, short by a factor of 3-4x for plenty of overdrive, this is dissapointing to say the least PCL84 consists of rather high mu triode (65) and a very sensitive pentode so I was hoping to get away with the two tube setup to the max. of their capability. I could cheat up 1.5x more voltage amplification with CCS load on the triode but I really wanted to keep away from sandy devices (except with diodes, of course) and at the same time get away with the ~15V parallel heating since I have the transformer handy from another project (16V, hence the dropping resistor in series with the filaments).I'll have to think it over once more, I might just add another PCL84 for two additional cascaded gain stages and revert to LTP phase splitter to offset extra gain. Perhaps one section could be used as some sort of effect (tremolo oscillator) instead ?
__________________
mod verb, transitive /mod/ to state that one is utterly clueless about the operation of device to be "modded" and into "fixing" things that are not broken; "My new amplifier sounds great so I want to mod it." |
|
|
|
|
#6 |
|
diyAudio Member
|
Hi Arnulf
Is there any special reason to implement D1 and D2? I have never seen diodes in that position before. erik
__________________
my surname is indeed 'de Best': neither misspelling nor snobbism! Ask SY! |
|
|
|
|
#7 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Feb 2009
|
Oh, it's just for power-up, diodes are still cheaper than ruined output tubes
You can leave them out as far as circuit is concerned, it will work just as well once everything heats up.
__________________
mod verb, transitive /mod/ to state that one is utterly clueless about the operation of device to be "modded" and into "fixing" things that are not broken; "My new amplifier sounds great so I want to mod it." |
|
|
|
|
#8 | |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Madrid
|
Quote:
I've just checked a 2010 Fender schematic and the input sensitivity is 25mV. Two inputs, one using a voltage divider for hot pickups. |
|
|
|
|
|
#9 | |
|
diyAudio Member
|
Quote:
Thanks for the explanation! Erik
__________________
my surname is indeed 'de Best': neither misspelling nor snobbism! Ask SY! |
|
|
|
|
|
#10 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Feb 2009
|
Uh-huh, another tube it is then. This throws a big monkey wrench into my neatly planned PCB but there's no other way around it. I'm considering either another PCL84 or PCC88.
__________________
mod verb, transitive /mod/ to state that one is utterly clueless about the operation of device to be "modded" and into "fixing" things that are not broken; "My new amplifier sounds great so I want to mod it." |
|
|
| Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|
|
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Simple 6V6 Push Pull Schematic | dsndblm | Tubes / Valves | 13 | 26th September 2009 02:52 AM |
| modify parallel push-pull EL84 to single push-pull | chungtat | Tubes / Valves | 12 | 3rd November 2005 11:25 PM |
| simple 6v6 push-pull schematic ? | vlljpior | Tubes / Valves | 6 | 30th November 2004 08:13 PM |
| schematic for a push pull EL 509 | Antonio Tucci | Tubes / Valves | 13 | 10th March 2004 11:11 PM |
| New To Site? | Need Help? |
| Page generated in 0.11445 seconds (80.93% PHP - 19.07% MySQL) with 11 queries |