|
|
|||||||
| Home | Forums | Rules | Articles | Store | Gallery | Blogs | Register | Donations | FAQ | Calendar | Search | Today's Posts | Mark Forums Read | Search |
| Tubes / Valves All about our sweet vacuum tubes :) Threads about Musical Instrument Amps of all kinds should be in the Instruments & Amps forum |
| diyAudio Sponsor | ||
|
|
||
|
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|
#1 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Southern California
|
I have some 1619 that i want to try in a SE Parafeed configuration (triode connected)using a ccs on the plate. If the load line is horizontal, how critical is the selection of an opt with a specific impedance ratio? Would any opt do as long as the proper coupling cap is selected (based on primary impedance)? Or is the rule of thumb to use a ratio similar to the one used if using a traditional se design based on the tube's load line?
Alfredo |
|
|
|
|
#2 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Ardeche
|
Note that as soon as you tie a load accross the CCS the load line will no longer be horizontal.
An horizontal load line (no current change) means that you extract no power from your tube. So you have to compute the load as usual according to the tube and the PSU you plan to use. Don't forget that the CCS will waste (and have to dissipate) the same power that the ouput tube itself, you have take that in account when designing your PSU. Yves |
|
|
|
|
#3 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Southern California
|
Thanks Yves,
I have searched but have not really found a clear explanation or graphs for this type of output stage. Searching a little more if found @ Active loads and signal current control "The Sum of the AC currents through the triode and the primary of the output transformer will equal the DC current set by the CCS" I now see that the CCS ideal horizontal load line only applies to stages whose load do not draw any current. Alfredo |
|
|
|
|
#4 | |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Feb 2009
|
Quote:
Neither of these eixt, both are theoretical concepts. In reality you have two loads in parallel (CCS & whatever the following stage presents) and one of these is usually dominant by far and it is this load that determines the combined load impedance, so you can usually disregard the CCS (it only marginally affects the load impedance with real life components and it would have zero effect in theory). So your OPT will still follow the same rules for SE output stage, the only difference is that there will be no DC present across the primary.
__________________
mod verb, transitive /mod/ to state that one is utterly clueless about the operation of device to be "modded" and into "fixing" things that are not broken; "My new amplifier sounds great so I want to mod it." |
|
|
|
|
|
#5 | |
|
diyAudio Moderator
|
Quote:
__________________
www.kta-hifi.net |
|
|
|
| Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|
|
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Question:disadvantages for using a SE OPT on parafeed? | pauldune | Tubes / Valves | 8 | 23rd December 2009 09:46 PM |
| Tubelab SE w/Parafeed | smbrown | Tubes / Valves | 3 | 10th October 2009 06:34 PM |
| ED8000 SE or Parafeed? | alexg | Tubes / Valves | 4 | 27th February 2008 09:26 PM |
| 12K low watt OPT for PP or Parafeed | Sheldon | Swap Meet | 0 | 5th January 2008 09:00 PM |
| Primary reactance of a parafeed OPT | cathode_leak | Tubes / Valves | 12 | 21st May 2005 07:34 AM |
| New To Site? | Need Help? |
| Page generated in 0.09451 seconds (76.75% PHP - 23.25% MySQL) with 10 queries |