|
|||||||
| Home | Forums | Rules | Articles | Store | Gallery | Blogs | Register | Donations | FAQ | Calendar | Search | Today's Posts | Mark Forums Read | Search |
| Tubes / Valves All about our sweet vacuum tubes :) Threads about Musical Instrument Amps of all kinds should be in the Instruments & Amps forum |
|
Please consider donating to help us continue to serve you.
Ads on/off / Custom Title / More PMs / More album space / Advanced printing & mass image saving |
|
![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|
#1 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Aug 2010
Location: London,UK
|
Greeting to all. I am a new member,a classical musician living in London.I first owned valve equiptment about 15 years ago and decided to teach myself valve electronics,with the aid of the superb Morgan Jones books, because I wanted to be able to be able to reproduce 78's as well as I could. However,as it happened,my first build was a microphone preamp because my commercial one failed during recording. It seemed natural to use differential pairs and I was frankly amazed that it worked first time.I have used this topology for my 3 subsequent preamps without problems. Recently I decided to have a go at some power amps so I began intending to put a balanced volume control at the input. I soon realised that if I wanted to stay differential then I absolutely needed a cathode follower stage if I was not to compromise frequency response.I duly built one; I had a 240-0-240 transformer available so I built a simple passive split supply,choke input on top and cap input with cascaded RC filtering for the negative. The mains is arranged to have the(toroidal) heater transformer come on upon plug in and the switch then turns on the HT. The circuit is a 6sn7 per channel sitting on a pair of Russian 6p15p (similar to el83) with 1k in their cathode circuits and the heater supply of these is elevated. Upon first power up, all seemed in order with about 34mA at 200 or so volts being drawn on top and the cathodes of the triodes sitting very steady at just over 5 volts. The negative supply was higher(or rather lower!) that I expected,partly because the transformer secondaries were 20V above nominal but also because the 4uF input cap was not reducing the DC as much as I anticipated. Nevertheless, about 260V is still within the rating of grid 2 (which is directly connected to 0V) for this valve. At any rate,I measured about 10V across each cathode resistor so all seemed well. The next morning I did the first audio test to be greeted by a deafening hum even at maximum volume attenuation although it did get louder as the volume was turned up. I checked my earthing and tried all the usual things although I knew in my bones that this would not solve the problem. Back on my workbench things had changed;the HT+ draw had more than doubled,the negative even more so,in fact I measured 30V across one cathode resistor before hurriedly switching off. I tested and cleared the supply with the valves removed but one curious result was measuring a 6V drop across the cathode resistor of one selectively removed pentode(!) One of the dual triodes was measuring 6V negative on its cathodes. I cannot understand what has gone wrong. Has anyone had this sort of problem? Is it possible that ceramic sockets could have internal shorts?-in this case one of the grid 3 pins is next to the anode pin but this seems a little farfetched. I would be most grateful for any help. Many thanks. N.A.
|
|
|
|
|
#2 |
|
mostly thinkerer
diyAudio Member
|
There is some confusion around about maximum rates for the 6P15P. I have seen some sites mentioning 330V, while other say it is 150V! Wavebourn (a member here) is convinced that the 6P15P is 'identical' to the 6P14P, which can handle 300V. Anyway, I have never experienced problems with a G2 and do not know what the consequences are, but maybe try a new pair of the 6P15P's and use some resistors in series with G2 (maybe 100R, to monitor G2 current and G2 dissipation).
__________________
my surname is indeed 'de Best': neither misspelling nor snobbism! Ask SY!
|
|
|
|
|
#3 | |
|
diyAudio Member
|
Quote:
__________________
If I disappear suddenly, that means I finally created a time machine and pushed wrong button that brought me to Stalin's Russia. In any experiment any result is the result. Even if it is negative. |
|
|
|
|
|
#4 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Aug 2010
Location: London,UK
|
Thank you; I will try monitoring G2 current with a small resistor. However, the Soviet data sheets,which I would expect to be conservative, give 330V and 1.5W max for G2. Moreover I would have expected that as the voltage across the cathode resistor began to rise then this would counteract the rising current unless both G1 and G2 were fried and I was simply left with a diode. I think I will knock the B- down anyway as there is no need for it to be this high.
|
|
|
|
|
#5 |
|
diyAudio Member
|
It would be nice to see you schematic.
For what you've explained, it more looks like tubes run away because of control grid currents caused by impurities in tubes.
__________________
If I disappear suddenly, that means I finally created a time machine and pushed wrong button that brought me to Stalin's Russia. In any experiment any result is the result. Even if it is negative. |
|
|
|
|
#6 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Aug 2010
Location: London,UK
|
Since I am new here and embarassingly unskilled in IT matters I have no idea yet how to post a schematic. It is, however, so simple that I can describe it in words; series resistors 100k from XLR pins(attenuator connected between them) to grids of dual 6sn7 cathode followers which are returned by 1M to 0V. Current sink 6p15p with G2 directly connected to 0V,each anode directly connected to each cathode and stopper resistor of 6sn7 and G3 and pentode cathode connected to -260V via 1k resistor.I repeat that all measured perfectly for several hours on first switch on so I suppose that eliminates any possibility of wiring error on my part. The 6p15p are ER grade with 2 OTK markings,the diamond mark, and the word "pyeryeprov" which my Russian dictionary tells me means "overproduction". Is it likely that such valves would be contaminated? The getter is pristine. Thank you.
|
|
|
|
|
#7 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: May 2007
|
You didn't mention g1 of the 6p15p - I assume this goes directly to -260V.
How is your soldering? A dry joint could leave electrodes floating. Too much flux left on the socket could cause leakage, which might only occur after a few weeks in a damp atmosphere (It has been warm and humid in London recently?). Try carefully inspecting your sockets. Internal shorts are unlikely, but poor pin contact can happen. What about heater-cathode voltage? Do the valves share a heater winding? If the 6p15p heater is at 0v with the cathode at -260V, then it could act like another anode, injecting hum and stealing current from the real anode. |
|
|
|
|
#8 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Aug 2010
Location: London,UK
|
Thank you,yes, G1 directly to B-. I think my soldering is ok;I use silver low melting point solder,silverplated sockets which I clean with an eraser until bright before soldering so the solder easily flows on the pins-I am,in fact,almost paranoid about the possibility of dry joints,particularly on tube sockets and earth bus bars.As I said, the 6p15p heaters are elevated to between 2/3 and 3/4 of the way down the B-.It has indeed been humid in London recently; a delicious cake made by my sister and uncharacteristically not gobbled up immediately went mouldy in just over 2 days.However,I see no flux left on the sockets to absorb this moisture; I tend to keep the iron on the outside of the sockets so that any droplets of flux tend to fall on the chassis.
|
|
|
|
|
#9 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: May 2007
|
I think we need to see a circuit diagram. Click on the Post Reply button and you can attach a diagram via the full reply page. Or Go Advanced button.
|
|
|
|
|
#10 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Aug 2010
Location: London,UK
|
Curiously,having reduced the B- to below 230V this strange current draw problem has disappeared. The loud hum remains although somewhat reduced. I shall try what DF96 has suggested and reference the heaters all the way down to the B-; I had been a little bit afraid of putting such a strain on the transformer secondary.
|
|
|
![]() |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| lm3886 + cathode follower PS problem | nightanole | Tubes / Valves | 6 | 24th March 2010 07:20 AM |
| cathode follower | vlljpior | Tubes / Valves | 6 | 22nd March 2005 07:50 PM |
| Question about direct coupling a anode follower into a cathode follower. | G | Tubes / Valves | 45 | 29th July 2004 06:47 PM |
| cathode follower | ackcheng | Tubes / Valves | 2 | 6th July 2004 03:12 PM |
| cathode follower | olvrkrg | Tubes / Valves | 3 | 21st February 2004 09:49 PM |
| New To Site? | Need Help? |