|
|
|||||||
| Home | Forums | Rules | Articles | Store | Gallery | Blogs | Register | Donations | FAQ | Calendar | Search | Today's Posts | Mark Forums Read | Search |
| Tubes / Valves All about our sweet vacuum tubes :) Threads about Musical Instrument Amps of all kinds should be in the Instruments & Amps forum |
| diyAudio Sponsor | ||
|
|
||
|
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|
#1 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: Binghamton, NY
|
If you had a set of tubes in push-pull with a load impedance of 4KP-P, if you kept all voltages the same and paralleled another set of tubes, would the load impedance then drop to 2KP-P?
Thanks, Ray |
|
|
|
|
#2 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: Johnson City, TN
|
Short answer is yes for class A, class AB1 and AB2.
I'm not sure about class B but Isuspect it follows the same math. |
|
|
|
|
#3 |
|
diyAudio Member
|
Load impedance will be the same (it depends on what is connected to the secondary), but load of tubes decreases (resistance that an anode sees will increase twice), so distortions will go down significantly. My first Pyramid was built such a way:
__________________
The devil is not so terrible as his mathematical model! Wavebourn: We Create Creativity! |
|
|
|
|
#4 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: May 2007
|
You may mean optimum load impedance i.e. the best load impedance to use, the one which best balances output and distortion. This halves when you put two valves in parallel.
The actual load impedance is set by the output load and the transformer turns ratio, so stays the same until you change the transformer. So it all depends on what you mean by load impedance. I assume you meant the first one above. |
|
|
|
|
#5 | |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Apr 2010
|
Quote:
As an example the 6v6 likes to see about 6000 ohms. drop the load (increase the impedance to the tube by 2X) and the distortion almost doubles. See last page. http://tdsl.duncanamps.com/link.php?target=0125C507 |
|
|
|
|
|
#6 |
|
diyAudio Member
|
It seems to me a sweet spot in terms of load impedance is the optimal ratio between distortions and electrical efficiency. I agree, I paid for increased sound quality by decreased efficiency. More parts, more heat. So what?
After that I've found better tubes to go with than ancient 6L6, and now I use only a pair of GU-50 for the same sweet pristine clean sound at twice higher output power. By the way, the current development, Pyramid-9 monoblock, uses 4 of GU-50, but for a different reason: twice higher power (160W compressor limited), while 6L6 were paralleled for 4 times lower distortions on 40W only output power. Also, screen grids in all cases are powered from significantly lower voltage regulated sources than anodes.
__________________
The devil is not so terrible as his mathematical model! Wavebourn: We Create Creativity! Last edited by Wavebourn; 13th July 2010 at 10:16 PM. |
|
|
| Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|
|
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| "Push-Pull" for push und "Push-Pull" for pull (like Gamnut) - whats the right name? | tiefbassuebertr | Solid State | 68 | 26th December 2011 07:17 PM |
| modify parallel push-pull EL84 to single push-pull | chungtat | Tubes / Valves | 12 | 3rd November 2005 11:25 PM |
| Parallel Push Pull Drivers | gingertube | Tubes / Valves | 14 | 13th May 2005 01:32 PM |
| parallel or push-pull | vlljpior | Tubes / Valves | 1 | 6th December 2004 12:13 AM |
| Double push-pull versus single push-pull | jraraujo | Tubes / Valves | 19 | 19th October 2002 12:23 AM |
| New To Site? | Need Help? |
| Page generated in 0.08926 seconds (75.61% PHP - 24.39% MySQL) with 10 queries |