|
|
|||||||
| Home | Forums | Rules | Articles | Store | Gallery | Blogs | Register | Donations | FAQ | Calendar | Search | Today's Posts | Mark Forums Read | Search |
| Tubes / Valves All about our sweet vacuum tubes :) Threads about Musical Instrument Amps of all kinds should be in the Instruments & Amps forum |
| diyAudio Sponsor | ||
|
|
||
|
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|
#1 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Jul 2008
|
My otherwise near mint Scott 222B has been diagnosed with a bad OPT, a TRA 8-4-1. I have not been able to find a replacement, but do have access to a pair of Scott TRA 8-5-1s.
1) Are these OPTs compatible; that is will the TRA 8-5-1 function successfully in the 222B as a replacement for the TRA 8-4-1? 2) Can anyone provide specifications of the TRA 8-4-1 in case I need to have a new one manufactured? Thanks for your time, ARS |
|
|
|
|
#2 |
|
frugal-phile(tm)
diyAudio Moderator
|
Whatever you get, you want to get a pair...PP OPTs for EL84/6BQ5, somewhere 7-10k plate-to-plate.
The Scott OPTs are outstanding (we have 2 sets of these, 1 set in a functioning Class A triode build (a stunning amp), and 1 being rebuilt (power trafo failure)) so for same quality they are unlikely to be inexpensive. dave
__________________
community sites t-linespeakers.org, frugal-horn.com ........ commercial site planet10-HiFi p10-hifi forum here at diyA |
|
|
|
|
#3 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Jul 2008
|
Planet 10,
Thanks. The Scott 8-5-1s I have a line on are used in the Scott 222 C&D models which use 7189 output tubes. My failed Scott TRA 8-4-1 OPT on the 222B drives less powerful 6BQ5 output tubes. Do you have an opinion as to the suitability of using the 8-5-1 in place of the 8-4-1? As an aside, perhaps, I have another 222B with significantly smaller 7-1 OPTs (~2/3 the size of the TRA 8-4-1 OPT). The smaller 7-1 opt unit has a earlier serial # then the unit with the larger 8-4-1 OPTs. Comments? ARS |
|
|
|
|
#4 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: Plainsboro, NJ
|
The TRA 8-5-1s will be fine. Just make sure the mechanical mounting fit is correct.
Using 7189s in place of 6BQ5/EL84s is always OK. The other way around can be problematic. The 7189 is rated for higher voltages than the 6BQ5 is.
__________________
Eli D. |
|
|
|
|
#5 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Jul 2008
|
Eli
Thanks- it as is I have understood: the 8-5-1 is OK electrically; the physical dimensions will be the determining factor. If I have to have the 8-4-1 rewound, I've been told the Essex TRA 8-4-1 winding is the same (or essentially so). Whatever, I'll get the 222B up and running. I appreciate everyones comments. ARS |
|
|
| Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|
|
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Can resistor i-v voltage be compared to MC output? What transformer specs? | homemade | Digital Source | 11 | 22nd August 2007 02:26 PM |
| Does anyone know the output transformer specs of the... | jarthel | Tubes / Valves | 12 | 24th June 2007 12:48 AM |
| Scott LK72 output transformer quality ? | ashok | Tubes / Valves | 4 | 11th February 2004 09:52 AM |
| Output Transformer specs | PeteMcK | Tubes / Valves | 6 | 14th March 2003 09:48 PM |
| New To Site? | Need Help? |
| Page generated in 0.07450 seconds (83.68% PHP - 16.32% MySQL) with 10 queries |