|
|
|||||||
| Home | Forums | Rules | Articles | Store | Gallery | Blogs | Register | Donations | FAQ | Calendar | Search | Today's Posts | Mark Forums Read | Search |
| Tubes / Valves All about our sweet vacuum tubes :) Threads about Musical Instrument Amps of all kinds should be in the Instruments & Amps forum |
| diyAudio Sponsor | ||
|
|
||
|
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|
#1 |
|
diyAudio Member
|
I want to pull a bit more current out of the HT secondary than the rated amount but I will be under-loading the filament windings.
How safe is it to do this based on the idea of keeping within the total rated power for the trafo ? Specifically: I have the Hammond 270FX and I want to boost my B+ by putting a capacitor in front of the power supply choke - Duncan Amps simulation says that the rms current draw through the HT winding will be around 200mA whereas spec. is 173mA. But I have a 5V 3A winding feeding only 1 rectifier and a 6.3V 5A winding which will feed 1x6SN7 and 2x6B4G for a total of 2.6A. Advice ? (should I bite the bullet and get another higher voltage trafo that I can use choke loaded ?)
__________________
"The test of the machine is the satisfaction it gives you. There isn't any other test. If the machine produces tranquility it's right. If it disturbs you it's wrong until either the machine or your mind is changed." Robert M Pirsig. |
|
|
|
|
#2 |
|
diyAudio Member
|
Aren't Hammonds rated in terms of DC output, anyway?
They're designed to run cool, so it's no big deal. I've got a 250V, 50mA winding ("125-0-125 100mA") running a 6L6 SE, it runs on the warm side but it's clearly not going to do anything for the next few decades. Tim
__________________
See my Electronics webpage -- the home of Vacuum Tube Drag Racing. The key to being a successful Audiophile: "I reject your reality and substitute my own!" |
|
|
|
|
#3 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Mar 2010
|
I agree; you aren't that much above specification. The wire size in the high voltage winding will be the limiting factor. If you can see the winding and estimate the gauge you can assume worst case 300-400 circular mils per Ampere. A good transformer is more like 600 or more so the safety factor is good enough.
The primary of course will run cooler than specification due to the total power being less than design. |
|
|
|
|
#4 |
|
diyAudio Member
|
Thanks !!!
__________________
"The test of the machine is the satisfaction it gives you. There isn't any other test. If the machine produces tranquility it's right. If it disturbs you it's wrong until either the machine or your mind is changed." Robert M Pirsig. |
|
|
|
|
#5 | |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: South Florida
|
Quote:
The only Hammond that I have seen fry was one that got wet during a hurricane, and it still worked for almost 2 months after I dried it out. In fact the amp was still playing when the stink coming out of the transformer convinced me that something was wrong.
__________________
Too much power is almost enough! Turn it up till it explodes - then back up just a little. |
|
|
|
|
|
#6 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Maui, Hawai'i, USA
|
Whut he said. I have operated Hammond 2xx series up to about 70% of rating, and they get hot enough you don't want to touch them. This Otemp also will cause them to start humming mechanically down the road. If you're operating this piece anywhere near 100% rating, you got too small a transformer.
Get a bigger rating, and get the 3xx series. Aloha, Poinz |
|
|
|
|
#7 |
|
diyAudio Member
|
Sounds like this is a case where I can stay on the small side but likely end up with a hot trafo which will probably be OK but it's not exactly an example of good design practice and I'll need to use a cap loaded supply too. The bigger trafo sounds like the preferred option, that way I can stick with a choke loaded supply too. The Hammond 373X and 376X look to be the best match.
Thanks again.
__________________
"The test of the machine is the satisfaction it gives you. There isn't any other test. If the machine produces tranquility it's right. If it disturbs you it's wrong until either the machine or your mind is changed." Robert M Pirsig. |
|
|
|
|
#8 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Bridgeville, CA
|
http://www.hammondmfg.com/pdf/5c007.pdf
Hammond has a design guide that describes how to use their so-called "AC current" rating with different rectifier and filter topologies. It turns out that the current multiplier for the FWCT cap input is 1.0; that is the nameplate rating multiplied by 1.0 in this case. Note that the output voltages in the guide may not all be correct but the current ratings seem to be correct. |
|
|
|
|
#9 | |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: South Florida
|
Quote:
I have modified that yard stick for modern Hammonds. They have used higher temp materials, but reduced the iron and copper content to make a lower cost transformer. The result is that they get hot. I have been pushing the limits with the transformer in my industrial Simple SE. That amp was built on a chassis that is really too small, and I didn't intend to run KT88's at 100 mA when I built it, but it sounds nice with them, so I decided to let it go until it blows. That was almost 4 years ago. The PC board is discolored, but the amp runs great. This transformer is a rule of 3 transformer. After it has been on for a few hours, you will yank your hand away after about 3 seconds! 5 or 10 is probably OK for a Hammond. I built a Tubelab SE for use with 45 tubes on a tiny Lexan chassis. It uses an Allied 6K56VG (Hammond) which is rated for 125 mA. It has about a 110 mA load when used with 45's and gets Hammond kind of hot. I have used 300B's in this amp which really irritates the power transformer, but it hasn't fried yet.
__________________
Too much power is almost enough! Turn it up till it explodes - then back up just a little. |
|
|
|
| Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|
|
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Filament current bias | greenvalve | Tubes / Valves | 11 | 29th November 2009 07:01 PM |
| LM317K upgrade?? Higher Current?? | Zero Cool | Everything Else | 2 | 4th December 2008 11:46 AM |
| Parallal SMPS to get higher current | 1206.sachin | Power Supplies | 5 | 29th October 2007 04:37 PM |
| constant current filament regs | Matt Rowland | Tubes / Valves | 7 | 25th October 2004 12:12 PM |
| Super-power amps - higher current better than higher voltage | Circlotron | Solid State | 34 | 28th June 2002 04:01 AM |
| New To Site? | Need Help? |
| Page generated in 0.10350 seconds (79.67% PHP - 20.33% MySQL) with 10 queries |