|
|
|||||||
| Home | Forums | Rules | Articles | Store | Gallery | Blogs | Register | Donations | FAQ | Calendar | Search | Today's Posts | Mark Forums Read | Search |
| Tubes / Valves All about our sweet vacuum tubes :) Threads about Musical Instrument Amps of all kinds should be in the Instruments & Amps forum |
| diyAudio Sponsor | ||
|
|
||
| View Poll Results: What to do next? | |||
| Build amp and test in real circuit |
|
13 | 92.86% |
| Do not bother, everything is fine |
|
0 | 0% |
| Throw it away |
|
1 | 7.14% |
| Voters: 14. You may not vote on this poll | |||
|
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|
#1 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Aug 2008
|
Hi, folks,
Recently I've got 70W PP output transformer, designed by myself, and decided to put it in bench test. I have not finished prototype amp yet, so its impossible to test trafo in real circuit. Factory I ordered this device from did not have core of the size I wanted, instead, one was too small, and another was too big (probably enough for 150W unit). So 2nd.option was the obvious choice. The resulting product is a 8 kg monster. I used a generator 10Hz - 100 KHz with 10V 5 Ohm output (yes, 5 Ohm not 50). I connected it to primary (shunted with 5K resistor), and loaded secondary with 10 Ohm resistor (not wire-wound). Transformer has quite unusual -4dB drop at 40 KHz and 1.5 dB peak at 50 KHz, the rest is fine up to 100 KHz. I do not have equipment to test above 100 KHz, or below 10 Hz, and do not I think this is necessary. Voltage on primary was always constant, so this is not issue of generator output impedance. Frequency response from 10Hz to 20 KHz is linear +/-1 dB. Do you have any idea what is the reason for so unusual behavior (or may be there is nothing at all to bother ?)? If anyone have any other ideas of bench-testing (e.g. with square wave), I will be very welcome Last edited by LinuksGuru; 26th June 2010 at 04:12 PM. |
|
|
|
|
#2 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Athens
|
First of all your testing method is not the right one for a PP trans. You need a differential source for the primary. Then resistors IN SERIES at each side with the same value as the Rp of the tubes you want to use.
Secondary loaded with the nominal speaker value, grounded (ground the lead which gives the better FR. Right now you are testing a SE transformer with Rsource of 5 Ohm !! (no tube with such low Rp as far as i know), and loaded with 5 Kohm // with the reflected load from the secondary. |
|
|
|
|
#3 | |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Aug 2008
|
Quote:
PS. One fellow noted a roll-off from 12 to 20 KHz. However, the whole chart is ONLY 6dB range, and this roll-off is just -1dB, its within norm. Last edited by LinuksGuru; 26th June 2010 at 08:07 PM. |
|
|
|
|
|
#4 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: May 2007
|
A differential test would be good, but you should be able to get a reasonable idea just by using the right resistive loading. If testing single-ended this is 2xRp in series with the primary. Why are you worried about what impedance your sig gen sees? As long as this is high enough not to damage it the real issue is what impedances the transformer sees. The frequency response is secondary voltage/ sig gen output (not primary voltage).
What you are seeing is the HF resonance of the transformer. |
|
|
|
|
#5 | |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: South Florida
|
Quote:
It is rather safe to say that 5 ohms does not represent any common tube. If you get the same peaking only more pronounced when the resistor is connected in series, you are looking at the usual resonance between the leakage inductance and the distributed winding capacitance. Since this is out of the audio band, build your amp and tweak the feedback as needed for proper square wave response.
__________________
Too much power is almost enough! Turn it up till it explodes - then back up just a little. |
|
|
|
|
|
#6 |
|
diyAudio Moderator
|
As long as you don't have DC running through it, you absolutely can test it single-ended. Use a resistor of 2x the plate resistance of the tubes you're going to be using in series with the generator (no need for a primary shunt) and a load resistor on the secondary equal to the nominal load resistance (8R, if that's what the transformer is spec'ed for).
You will almost surely see an HF resonance- going to a larger core just about insures that your leakage inductance will be higher, so you're likely to have some limits on the high frequency response.
__________________
“Listening to records is like ****ing a picture of Brigitte Bardot.” - Sergiu Celibidache |
|
|
|
|
#7 | |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Jun 2010
Location: W-S, NC
|
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
|
#8 | ||
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Aug 2008
|
Quote:
Quote:
PS. Yes, transformer is indeed too large, and those peaks and dips at 40-50 Khz may be result of this. On another side, even at max power flux is below 8000G, so distortions caused by the core are minimal. Additionally, this over-sized monster can handle 10mA DC imbalance of output tubes idle current without degradation of LF response. At least, it looks so on my calc sheet. |
||
|
|
|
|
#9 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Apr 2007
|
You are not very interested in what impedance the generator will see are you? To get a somewhat representative frequecy plot you will need to assure that your transformer "sees" a resonably representative driving impedance i.e. the output impedance of your PP stage.
In Class A the output impdance of a PP stage is approx 2xRp. To simulate this you need to put a resistor of 2xRp in SERIES with your generator. /Olof
__________________
I'm not allowed to do magic, union rules... |
|
|
|
|
#10 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: May 2007
|
Don't think about what impedance your generator will see. This is irrelevant. The issue is what impedance the transformer sees. At present it sees the 5 ohm output impedance of the generator, which is far too low. The 5k you added in parallel has no effect whatsoever - 5 in parallel with 5k is 4.995 !
You can add either two separate Rp resistors for balance, or one 2xRp resistor for simplicity. We are all telling you the same thing! The purpose of this resistor is to model the source impedance of the valve anode. Note that this is the anode impedance from the data sheet, not the matching impedance. I suspect that 5k may be the matching impedance, as it sounds too high for a triode and too low for a pentode? |
|
|
| Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|
|
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| PP Output Transformer design | Hi-Q | Tubes / Valves | 12 | 28th October 2009 02:23 PM |
| Unbalacing a PP output transformer? | dshortt9 | Tubes / Valves | 19 | 22nd August 2007 06:20 PM |
| EL84 PP output transformer for 6L6 PP class A | engels | Tubes / Valves | 8 | 30th May 2007 09:45 AM |
| PP output transformer grounded or not ? | jogas | Tubes / Valves | 7 | 2nd May 2005 02:58 PM |
| Testing transformer output | DieterD | Solid State | 12 | 9th January 2002 01:45 PM |
| New To Site? | Need Help? |
| Page generated in 0.13136 seconds (83.21% PHP - 16.79% MySQL) with 12 queries |