|
|
|||||||
| Home | Forums | Rules | Articles | Store | Gallery | Blogs | Register | Donations | FAQ | Calendar | Search | Today's Posts | Mark Forums Read | Search |
| Tubes / Valves All about our sweet vacuum tubes :) Threads about Musical Instrument Amps of all kinds should be in the Instruments & Amps forum |
| diyAudio Sponsor | ||
|
|
||
|
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|
#1 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: May 2010
|
Hi
New to the forum I'm in the process of trying to change caps in my pp amplifiers The amps are very solid state sounding and i'm trying to empart a bit of musicality and body to the sound the stock caps are Sonicap gen 1 although balanced sounding they lack musicality I eventually switched these to the Russian k40's although musical I lost all of the transparency and dynamics the music seems rolled off The next set of caps I want to try out is a mix hybrid sort of I was thinking of going with Dynamicaps in the input positon and Jupiter in the Finals (the amps only have 3 coupling caps no cap goes to the output tube) I want to somehow try to keep the transparency and good dynamics of the Gen 1 and add some midrange and frequency extension with the Jupiters Any thoughts on this combo I currently have vcap teflons in my pre amp and before I went with the Russian k40 the system was a bit too analytical and revealing The k40 smoothed things out but at the expense of everthing else Any input appreciated |
|
|
|
|
#2 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Mar 2010
|
No offense meant, but...
You are wasting your time. You have succumbed to the metaphysics of this stuff. Most if not all of the difference you hear is in your head. |
|
|
|
|
#3 |
|
diyAudio Moderator
|
Far more likely that any problems you might be hearing can be most effectively dealt with by optimizing topology and operating points rather than throwing money blindly at brand names. Could you post a schematic?
__________________
“Listening to records is like ****ing a picture of Brigitte Bardot.” - Sergiu Celibidache |
|
|
|
|
#4 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: May 2010
|
Sorry Guys I don't have a schematic ..these are Dodd Audio 120 monoblocks
Tubes are kt 77/el34 and 5687 input solid state rectification Not sure if this helps |
|
|
|
|
#5 | |
|
diyAudio Moderator
|
Quote:
__________________
“Listening to records is like ****ing a picture of Brigitte Bardot.” - Sergiu Celibidache |
|
|
|
|
|
#6 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: May 2010
|
I have no clue when it comes schematics or how to trace out - sorry
I thought this was a straight forward question |
|
|
|
|
#7 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: Cambridge, England.
|
If it was me I'd stick with polypropylene caps from any reputable source.
The tubes operating points and any electrolytic caps would be next to look at for me, as would reducing loop feedback and adding local feedback as practical. |
|
|
|
|
#8 |
|
diyAudio Member
|
That solid state sound is more likely being caused by too much gNFB. Reducing the gNFB, assuming that the reason for excessive gNFB in the first place was not an attempt to cover up a horrible open loop design (there is all too much of that going around) will do more for sonic improvement than supposedly magical audiophool capacitors (or any other gimmick).
|
|
|
|
|
#9 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Mar 2010
|
I just know if too much gNFB will reduce sonic. I instead use as much gNFB but with "tube character" resistor like Allen Bradley in this position (feedback R and bypass R/divider), in order to get the tube sound through this gNFB. Am I doing wrong? I use 33k/10k (3.3 gain), while normal circuit implement 10 to 20 of gain.
|
|
|
|
|
#10 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: May 2010
|
I thought it wasn't a good idea to use the same type of caps for all coupling postions
I agree that a good polyprop in the input stage is good but a teflon cap in this position may be better no ? |
|
|
| Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|
|
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Polar electro with bypass cap to replace nonpolar as coupling cap? | at77 | Parts | 0 | 12th January 2010 02:05 AM |
| Coupling cap before or after pot? | sharpi31 | Parts | 11 | 26th May 2008 06:02 PM |
| Input cap choices | toque_101 | Chip Amps | 34 | 28th January 2004 10:54 PM |
| Coupling cap | Raka | Chip Amps | 11 | 9th June 2003 01:06 PM |
| .22uf cap in place of .25uf coupling cap, OK? | bbaker6212 | Tubes / Valves | 5 | 15th July 2002 09:08 PM |
| New To Site? | Need Help? |
| Page generated in 0.10944 seconds (76.10% PHP - 23.90% MySQL) with 10 queries |