|
|||||||
| Home | Forums | Rules | Articles | Store | Gallery | Blogs | Register | Donations | FAQ | Calendar | Search | Today's Posts | Mark Forums Read | Search |
| Tubes / Valves All about our sweet vacuum tubes :) Threads about Musical Instrument Amps of all kinds should be in the Instruments & Amps forum |
| diyAudio Sponsor | ||
|
||
 |
|
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
2nd May 2010, 09:39 AM
|
#1 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: West USA
|
e283cc better sounding than?
I have received some e283cc(philips SQ). I see that the pin out is different than a ecc83 but the circuit characteristics are the same. I also have a mono block set that has an ecc83 input stage tube. This input stage is for impedance changing involving little gain. However, it is also a big player in the sound of the amps as I have experimented with many types of ecc83 tubes in this position(teles, mullard RCA Jan sylv). What could be expected in sound changes by changing to the better spec tube? Better than 5751/e83cc? Could try a conversion socket, but doesn't seem to me to be adequate for a fair comparison. Anyone with some experience concerning converting to this tube?
|
|
|
| Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| What is better sounding I/V con. ? | Gasho | Digital Source | 25 | 29th September 2010 06:21 PM |
| Best Sounding Magnet! | Paradise_Ice | Multi-Way | 67 | 19th July 2004 09:25 PM |
| Best Sounding 6550 | jewilson | Tubes / Valves | 6 | 13th January 2004 01:17 PM |
| E283cc | marjan | Tubes / Valves | 4 | 18th December 2003 06:51 PM |
| New To Site? | Need Help? |
| Page generated in 0.06528 seconds (66.64% PHP - 33.36% MySQL) with 10 queries |
