|
|
|||||||
| Home | Forums | Rules | Articles | Store | Gallery | Blogs | Register | Donations | FAQ | Calendar | Search | Today's Posts | Mark Forums Read | Search |
| Tubes / Valves All about our sweet vacuum tubes :) Threads about Musical Instrument Amps of all kinds should be in the Instruments & Amps forum |
| diyAudio Sponsor | ||
|
|
||
|
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|
#1 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Denmark
|
I would like to take the tupe amp output impedance into acount when I design my loudspeakers. can anyone tell me in what range, the typical output impedance of a push-pull and a SET amp is?
|
|
|
|
|
#2 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Apr 2010
|
every day is market goes up and down so , i think that you should find nearest hardware cheap market for this project.
|
|
|
|
|
#3 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: SoCal
|
I'd suggest designing with a 2 ohm source impedance in mind.
|
|
|
|
|
#4 |
|
diyAudio Member
|
I think 2 ohms is a good number for a non-feedback triode PP or SE amp.
For a Classic UL or pentode amp with feedback, the DF was usually around 8, so 1 ohm would be realistic for a ST70 etc. Obviously gross generalizations. Doug
__________________
Scienta sine ars nihil est - Science without Art is nothing. (Implies the converse as well) Mater tua criceta fuit, et pater tuo redoluit bacarum sambucus |
|
|
|
|
#5 |
|
Banned
|
|
|
|
|
|
#6 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Denmark
|
Thank you all, for the good imputs. I am suppriced to see that you belive there is not much difference in output impedance between PP and SE amps. I will probably simulate with a output impedance value between 1 and 2 ohm. Then cablesize and series inducteres can be used to trim the right bas performance, I think.
|
|
|
|
|
#7 |
|
diyAudio Moderator
|
I would broaden the range just a bit, and say 1 - 4 ohms to be safe because I have several 300B PP 0 fdbk pushpull and SE amps with output impedances of > 3 ohms or so, and this would be typical..
Don't forget you also have to include the DCR of the transformer primary and secondary in the source impedance calculation, and a DCR of 1 ohm on the 8 ohm tap is not uncommon. Note that the following example should be considered a gross simplification but is anecdotal of the sorts of impedances you can expect with an SE amp. My 300B SE amplifier has a 3K:8 OPT, the primary DCR is about 100 ohms, and the secondary DCR close enough to 1 ohm for the purposes of this example.. The output tube rp is about 700 ohms. Primary DCR is 100 ohms The impedance transformation ratio is 375:1 primary to secondary. Secondary DCR is 1 ohm So figuring the source impedance on the primary is approximately 800 ohms then (800/375) + 1 = 3.13 ohms at the secondary for the 8 ohm tap. Leakage inductance may increase the effective source impedance at higher frequencies, but I ignore it since I am primarily interested in the effect on the woofer. The amplifier source impedance will be roughly 3 ohms in this example, and is in fact close enough for most purposes. It is not at all unusual for a 0 fdbk PP amplifier optimized for output power as opposed to source impedance to have a significantly higher source impedance than an SE amplifier using the same tube type. Note also that class A and class A/B PP amplifiers will have different source impedances even with the same OPT and in the case of the A/B amplifier that source impedance changes significantly as a function of power output beyond the class A region of operation.
__________________
www.kta-hifi.net Last edited by kevinkr; 26th April 2010 at 04:56 PM. |
|
|
|
|
#8 | |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: SoCal
|
Quote:
That was the range I had in mind when suggesting to design with a 2 ohm source impedance in mind (for an unknown tube amp). It's 2 x 1ohm, but 1/2 x 4ohms. It would compromise the extremes equally and be closer to ideal for amps in the middle range. |
|
|
|
|
|
#9 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Denmark
|
ok Thanks, it sounds like I should go a little higher on the expected output impedance.
|
|
|
|
|
#10 | |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: South Florida
|
Quote:
There are many texts and articles on controlling speaker cone motion by lowering the output impedance of the amplifier and associated wiring. It is important to remember that the speaker generates a voltage when it moves. The "cone control" is provided by forcing that voltage generator to operate into a short circuit, or as low an impedance that is practical. What is often overlooked is that the speaker voice coil has a DC resistance too, and it is often several ohms. Many speaker design programs and texts do not consider this since it is beyond our control.
__________________
Too much power is almost enough! Turn it up till it explodes - then back up just a little. |
|
|
|
| Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|
|
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Tube line stage output impedance | regal | Tubes / Valves | 28 | 21st July 2010 12:40 PM |
| Op amps: output impedance and load resistance | mudihan | Chip Amps | 17 | 20th April 2009 08:09 AM |
| Tube amps, power and speaker impedance | Klimon | Tubes / Valves | 3 | 11th January 2007 07:32 AM |
| Help with Tube Phono Output Impedance | aliwakil | Tubes / Valves | 2 | 15th March 2005 06:14 AM |
| New To Site? | Need Help? |
| Page generated in 0.12165 seconds (80.89% PHP - 19.11% MySQL) with 10 queries |