|
|
|||||||
| Home | Forums | Rules | Articles | Store | Gallery | Blogs | Register | Donations | FAQ | Calendar | Search | Today's Posts | Mark Forums Read | Search |
| Tubes / Valves All about our sweet vacuum tubes :) Threads about Musical Instrument Amps of all kinds should be in the Instruments & Amps forum |
| diyAudio Sponsor | ||
|
|
||
|
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|
#1 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Mar 2010
|
So... I have been posting a few things about a guitar amp and I'm right about to start building the one in my attachment (for the most part).
The first stage is one 12AX7 in parallel with itself (both triodes, like some matchless amps). I also plan on putting caps in parallel with each rectifier diode, and a large valued drain resistor at the first filter cap to drain the caps when it is off. Critiques or any opinions are welcome. |
|
|
|
|
#3 |
|
Tinkerer
diyAudio Member
|
Caps in parrallel with the rectifier diodes are always a good idea. But, it is better to build an AX84 P1. I have built one and it is a highly recommended design! It also includes the draining caps, in a smart way.
AX84.com - The Cooperative Tube Guitar Amp Project |
|
|
|
|
#4 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Mar 2010
|
I dunno if I buy into saying it is better to build something, especially because everyone else is building it.
|
|
|
|
|
#5 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Sydney
|
AX84 is a great site. The the projects are very well documented and supported. Some of the biggest problems for inexperienced builders is layout. The AX84 site has layout diabrams for the chassis and for the turret boards to make an amp that will help guarantee success. These are the reasons to consider the designs on the site.
|
|
|
|
|
#6 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Mar 2010
|
I agree its a great site and set of projects, but just saying it's good because lots of people build it is not a valid argument. I am not going to completely change my whole project at this point, I only wanted some ideas on any small improvements from experienced builders.
|
|
|
|
|
#7 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Sydney
|
I did not think anybody actually said to build an AX84 because "lots of people build it". Costis_n suggested to build an AX84 because he built one, was obviously happy with it and it is a "highly recommended design". He also mentioned some design features of that amp that you might be interested in. Have a look at the member ID section on the left of the posts. People from all over the world contribute to try and help each other out. For many, English is not a first language. Even those who do speak English, local 'turns of phrase' may not translate as expected. Unlike many online forums, I have found that just about everyone on this site is genuinely interested in offering constructive help, not trying to prove a point...
In any case, I think you have a recommendation not to parallel the first 12AX7 sections if it is not what is on the schematic of your preferred design. Costis_n mentions the bleed resistor setup on the AX84. It is not primarily a bleed resistor, however it does perform this function secondarily. He is talking about the resistor divider from B+ that is tied to the centre tap of the heater winding that elevates the heater voltage reference. I will let you look up the advantages of this. Secondly, as I stated above, layout is critical in vacuum tube circuits. The AX84 site has chassis and turret board layout diagrams. If you are not going to use one of their designs directly, I highly recommend you adapt one of their layouts to suit your schematic. Also, as I do not know your experience level, I would recommend the following article regarding grounding. I found it really helped me understand how to prevent hum. It will be useful for you when deciding how to lay out your components. Star Grounding Last bit of advice: plan your layout and wiring before drilling any holes or soldering any components. It will save much grief! |
|
|
|
|
#8 | |
|
Banned
|
Quote:
Your amplifier will work, and if it doesn't you can tweak it (particularly if it's wired point-to-point), if that's what you are concerned about. It's not economical though, you've got gain and drive going to waste. You'd be better using the gain from your first stage to drive a spring reverb, but again, take a look at the Fender '63 Reverb with a 12AT7, 12AX7, 6V6GT (not a million miles away from an EL84, which is a bit more sensitive but with a bit less dissipation) to see the general arrangement. The schematic's on the Fender website, and the ones that aren't are on Dr.Tube. The specialist in the repair and modification of tube amps. Sale of tubes and components. w |
|
|
|
|
|
#9 |
|
Tinkerer
diyAudio Member
|
Exactly, the argument is that i built it and it sounds sweeeeet, to everybody that listened to it. Whatever ypu build, don't skimp on cabinet and speaker. A 12 inch low-power Jensen was very good for this one, I am sure that fitting something inferior would not do it justice.
|
|
|
|
|
#10 |
|
diyAudio Member
|
I built a small guitar amp using some old TV tubes I had laying around. PCF80 and PCL82. Tried to give it a lot of gain. As it turns out the sound sucks at high gain but it's one very sweet sounding amp at low gain.
My point? If you want to get it right off the bat, and spend more time playing the guitar, go for the AX84. If you want to experiment, do your thing and be prepared to not to get the sound you expect from the first try. That said I don't see anything wrong with your schematic. What is C10 for?? Keep it fun! Kenneth
__________________
Never send a human to do a machine's job. --Agent Smith Last edited by kavermei; 13th April 2010 at 07:55 AM. |
|
|
| Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|
|
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| OPAMPS... im get way ahead of my self now... | hamish_gill | Solid State | 5 | 26th March 2009 08:41 PM |
| Way ahead of you! | Circlotron | Everything Else | 3 | 31st December 2008 06:38 PM |
| New To Site? | Need Help? |
| Page generated in 0.11150 seconds (79.06% PHP - 20.94% MySQL) with 11 queries |