|
|
|||||||
| Home | Forums | Rules | Articles | Store | Gallery | Blogs | Register | Donations | FAQ | Calendar | Search | Today's Posts | Mark Forums Read | Search |
| Tubes / Valves All about our sweet vacuum tubes :) Threads about Musical Instrument Amps of all kinds should be in the Instruments & Amps forum |
| diyAudio Sponsor | ||
|
|
||
|
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|
#1 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: west lafayette
|
I'd like to build a simple prototype plasma tweeter in the next few weeks to demonstrate the concept.
A design that pulses a high frequency resonance (>100khz) greatly reduces the voltage demands on the amplifier and will maximize energy transfer. However, such a circuit would require complex analysis. I believe a simple, yet elegant design would result from directly coupling the output of the amplifier to the electrodes. For the tweeter prototype, I'd like to use a separation distance of 1cm between the electrodes and operate them in anti-phase (push-pull). Dielectric breakdown of the air occurs at a potential of 3kV/cm. Since the electrodes are defined by a separation distance of 1cm, we will require 1.5kV on the positive electrode and -1.5kV on the negative electrode. Once this potential is reached, the air will ionize and transition from a gas (~excellent insulator) to a plasma (~excellent conductor). Resistance will be VERY low. For the amplifier prototype, I'd like use a push-pull voltage source. If the amplifier operates in push-pull mode, we can operate the electrodes in anti-phase. If the amplifier is a voltage source, we can control the potential between the electrodes. I'd like to build two different amplifiers and contrast their performance. 1) Class A amplifier utilizing Vacuum tubes Goals: -maximum linearity -minimum 100W Advantages: Vacuum tubes are characterized by a linear response and the ability to provide extremely high voltages. In addition, Vacuum tubes would be able to provide a continuous waveform to the electrodes. As a result, once the plasma was formed (transient state), it would be inherently stable. Disadvantages: Vacuum tubes are very inefficient and quite expensive. They will require significant cooling. However, I am interested in heat transport so I do not consider this a significant disadvantage. A digital to analog converter will have to be used. This will require additional components and will introduce an error (however small). Notes: A stable plasma requires a specific "holding current". As a result, a solution must be provided which maintains the "holding current" through the electrodes while not interfering with the response of the tweeter. Since an AC waveform is being passed between the electrodes, there will be a point at which current is zero. I'm not sure if this is simply a "theoretical" problem since the waveform will not spend any finite amount of time at a position since it is continuous. I believe an AC voltage source power supply will be required. How would you approach designing the power supply? What Vacuum tubes would you recommend? Do Ultralinear (high fidelity) Vacuum tubes exist which can provide 1.5kV on the electrodes? 2) Class D amplifier utilizing Insulated Gate Bipolar Transistors Goals: -Maximum linearity -minimum 1kW -easily scalable to 10kW Advantages: IGBTs are characterized by their high efficiency, fast switching, and the ability to handle extremely high voltages and large currents. I believe IGBTs would easily be capable of providing 1.5kV to the electrodes and can switch over 100,000 times per second. Additional IGBTs could be connected in parallel to provide any desired amount of current. IGBTs would not require a digital to analog converter. They can be switched at the discrete steps corresponding to the exact representation of the digital wave from the source. Disadvantages: IGBTs could not provide a continuous waveform to the electrodes. In addition, semiconductors are inherently non-linear (can this be corrected with feedback?). Notes: A stable plasma requires a specific "holding current". As a result, a solution must be provided which maintains the "holding current" through the electrodes while not interfering with the response of the tweeter. The IGBTs are characterized by a stabilization time and will exist in the "OFF" position for a finite amount of time. Since the IGBTs are able to switch very quickly (>100,000 times per second), the time the IGBTs spend in the "OFF" position will be very small. I do not assume any current will be passing through the electrodes when the IGBTs are in the "OFF" position. How can I relate this to the holding current? Will the plasma still be destabilized even if this time is made very small? An H-bridge utilizing IGBTs could provide current in either direction with a DC voltage source power supply. How would you approach designing the power supply? What IGBTs would you recommend? What should I use to control the IGBTs? Thanks, Thadman
__________________
"It is a profound and necessary truth that the deep things in science are not found because they are useful; they are found because it was possible to find them." Last edited by thadman; 5th April 2010 at 07:55 AM. |
|
|
|
|
#2 | |||||||
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Feb 2009
|
Quote:
You remarked that tubes are inefficient further down your post. Heating current aside, they will be inefficient in your design by the virtue of the choice you've made (to go class A & to operate without carrier modulation). Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
"Ultralinear" is a term that describes a specific feedback arrangement from output transformer for pentodes (and tetrodes). I strongly suggest you invest some more time to familiarize yourself with what you're planning to do. Voltages of a couple of kV are extremely dangerous.
__________________
mod verb, transitive /mod/ to state that one is utterly clueless about the operation of device to be "modded" and into "fixing" things that are not broken; "My new amplifier sounds great so I want to mod it." |
|||||||
|
|
|
|
#3 | |||
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: west lafayette
|
Quote:
Thanks for the correction. This is the kind of feedback I'm looking for Quote:
Quote:
BTW, thanks for taking the time to respond to my post. I really appreciate it. Best Regards, Thadman
__________________
"It is a profound and necessary truth that the deep things in science are not found because they are useful; they are found because it was possible to find them." |
|||
|
|
|
|
#4 | ||||
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Feb 2009
|
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
Again, my suggestion would be to: 1: Have a look at existing plasma speaker designs (all I've seen use modulated carrier, step up transformer and adjustable gap width; none use AF AC or fixed gap) and try not to reinvent anything when existing solution works just fine and doesn't add new variables into the equation. Perhaps try to build one as a reference from scrap parts from an old CRT TV ? 2: Have a look at tube AM transmitter designs because that's what a tube equivalent of existing (solid state powered) plasma speaker design would be. 3: Have a look at local laws and regulations regarding RF transmission in the band of your interest - your project might cause serious interference to LW/MW communications and/or public radio.
__________________
mod verb, transitive /mod/ to state that one is utterly clueless about the operation of device to be "modded" and into "fixing" things that are not broken; "My new amplifier sounds great so I want to mod it." |
||||
|
|
|
|
#5 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Feb 2009
|
__________________
mod verb, transitive /mod/ to state that one is utterly clueless about the operation of device to be "modded" and into "fixing" things that are not broken; "My new amplifier sounds great so I want to mod it." |
|
|
|
|
#6 |
|
diyAudio Moderator
|
One other thing is do your experiments in a very well ventilated space, plasma tweeters can produce massive quantities of ozone. My own exposure to operating plasma tweeters resulted in a severe asthma attack - I have avoided them since.
__________________
www.kta-hifi.net |
|
|
|
|
#7 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: west lafayette
|
Do solutions exist which can attract and neutralize the produced ozone?
__________________
"It is a profound and necessary truth that the deep things in science are not found because they are useful; they are found because it was possible to find them." |
|
|
|
|
#8 | |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Bridgeville, CA
|
Quote:
I agree with previous posters that you will need something to strike and maintain the arc in the absence of audio signal. There is a significant amount of work needed to ionize the air which would create a lot of distortion and probably dropouts. It's hard enough as it is without introducing new variables. An AM system is simple and relatively easy to get working. There is a ~27MHz frequency allowed for industrial use that you might look into. I've become interested in a different arc-less design that would use modulated DC but it's purely theoretical at this point. Voltages would be in the 50KV+ range at low current making implementation a big question mark. Michael |
|
|
|
|
|
#9 | |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Nov 2009
Location: Cape Town
|
Quote:
OTOH, as you pointed out, resistance of the plasma will be low. If the arc is maintained with a DC current, it should be possible to modulate it with an audio signal of reasonable voltage. |
|
|
|
|
|
#10 | |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Feb 2009
|
Quote:
My suggestion: ventilate your premises well and you'll be just fine, unless you otherwise have problems around photocopiers, laser printers and similar ozone generating devices.
__________________
mod verb, transitive /mod/ to state that one is utterly clueless about the operation of device to be "modded" and into "fixing" things that are not broken; "My new amplifier sounds great so I want to mod it." |
|
|
|
| Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|
|
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| High Voltage Direct Drive amplifier for Plasma loudspeaker | thadman | Solid State | 1 | 5th April 2010 08:19 AM |
| Direct Drive amplifier for DIY ribbon? | thadman | Solid State | 90 | 28th November 2009 05:09 AM |
| Direct Drive amplifier for DIY ribbon? | thadman | Planars & Exotics | 4 | 9th November 2009 01:46 PM |
| transconductance power amplifier for current-drive loudspeaker? | alex0 | Solid State | 30 | 26th May 2008 08:15 AM |
| Portable direct drive amplifier for ESL headphones | shyfx | Solid State | 6 | 11th May 2004 10:54 PM |
| New To Site? | Need Help? |
| Page generated in 0.15899 seconds (86.30% PHP - 13.70% MySQL) with 11 queries |