Go Back   Home > Forums > Amplifiers > Tubes / Valves
Home Forums Rules Articles Store Gallery Blogs Register Donations FAQ Calendar Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read

Tubes / Valves All about our sweet vacuum tubes :) Threads about Musical Instrument Amps of all kinds should be in the Instruments & Amps forum

diyAudio Sponsor

Search for a tube at thetubestore.com                            Product reviews and more

Audio tubes for any amplifier: from high end home audio to classic guitar amps.

Quick links by tube type: 12AX7, EL34, 6L6, KT66, 6550, KT88, EL84, 12AU7, 12AT7, 6922, 6H30, 300B, 6V6, 6SN7 

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 24th February 2010, 10:50 PM   #1
diyAudio Member
 
Big John's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2010
Default Revox Model 40- leave it alone or dig in?

Hi- This is my first post after digging around for a few weeks, what a great forum!

Here's the story: I was given a dead Revox Model 40 integrated amp a while back. Cute, simple, 10 watts per channel. The friend who gave it to me has the same model and it is his only amp since downsizing from a huge Conrad Johnson (house to Swiss apartment ), and he is in love with his.

This got me back on a path I started years ago- learning more about electronics and trying to soak up as much info as possible before hitting the on switch on the soldering station.

In the meantime I've come up with another working Model 40, which is working quite well.

Where I'm confused is in some of the info regarding capacitors. I read or been told to replace all the caps, period. Also to replace only electrolytics. Also to keep it as original as possible and only replace components if and when they fail.

So what does one do? I feel like this amp could give a little more, and considering it's 45 years old I'm sure that the electrolytics at least are in poor shape. But it also has loads of 'mustard' caps and I'm not too keen on arbitrarily mucking up Mr. Studer's work in there.

I suppose I will start with the dead 40 and get it going.

Here's a pic of the topside

Click the image to open in full size.

The underside is bare except for 3 big filter cap cans and the solid state bridge rectifiers.
  Reply With Quote
Old 24th February 2010, 11:50 PM   #2
diyAudio Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: Plainsboro, NJ
John,

Electrolytic caps. literally dry out over time. So, replacing all 'lytics is a given.

The "mustard" caps. may or may not need replacing. If they are leaking (electrically), replacement is in order.

Do you have a scan of the schematic? If so, please post it.
__________________
Eli D.
  Reply With Quote
Old 25th February 2010, 12:00 AM   #3
Banned
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Blog Entries: 2
This looks just great.

If you can get someone who is sensitive to look at it and do the minimum to bring it back into spec. based on some test and measurement and judicious replacement of electrolytics, that would be my recommendation. If you are out of practice, you could easily leave what is a minor work of art looking a bit sorry. This is for you to judge tho', I've seen first-time builders produce really nice work.

w
  Reply With Quote
Old 25th February 2010, 12:18 AM   #4
diyAudio Member
 
Big John's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2010
It is beautifully laid out. I've attached the schematic, hopefully it will be legible.

There's one lonely electrolytic in one of the tube "turrets", otherwise it's just the filter cans. I think I will replace those as they must be way off, but will certainly do it in a sympathetic and reversible manner.
Attached Images
File Type: jpg Revox Modell 40.jpg (456.7 KB, 346 views)
  Reply With Quote
Old 25th February 2010, 01:22 AM   #5
diyAudio Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: Plainsboro, NJ
Considerable "skull sweat" went into this design. Rotary switches in the tone controls. A separate B+ rectifier bridge for each channel. Yowzah!

Disagreeing with some of the choices made is something we "always" do here. For instance, active RIAA EQ in the phono section. All in all, a very fine effort. FWIW, the thing I'd pick on most is that the value of the coupling caps. between splitter and finals is too small. That is common in units of this time frame. The net pentode grid to ground resistance seems to be 352 KOhms. Combining that with 47 nF. coupling caps. creates a high pass pole with F3 = 9.6 Hz. That pole should be <= 5 Hz. Increasing those coupling caps. to 100 nF. would accomplish that. 400 WVDC 716P series Orange Drops would be my choice. BTW, the same sort of argument applies even more forcefully to the cap. coupling the voltage amplifier to the "concertina" phase splitter. I suggest a 22 nF. part there.
__________________
Eli D.
  Reply With Quote
Old 25th February 2010, 06:48 AM   #6
diyAudio Member
 
kavermei's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Lokeren, Belgium
Send a message via MSN to kavermei
Frag Jan zuerst --- Ask Jan First have some new production filter caps with old-style looks, though I'm not sure they have 50+50+50...
__________________
Never send a human to do a machine's job. --Agent Smith
  Reply With Quote
Old 25th February 2010, 07:10 AM   #7
frugal-phile(tm)
diyAudio Moderator
 
planet10's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: Victoria, BC, NA, Sol III
Blog Entries: 4
That amp certainly has an elegant layout, and some of the thot going into it (as Eli has already pointed out) are special.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Big John View Post
Where I'm confused is in some of the info regarding capacitors. I read or been told to replace all the caps, period. Also to replace only electrolytics. Also to keep it as original as possible and only replace components if and when they fail.
Depends on what your goals are. A restoration to maintain collectors value, has you doing the later, trying to get the most out of the iron and tubes that are there, means probably replacing most of the passive parts.

Modern capacitors, to be specific, are much better than vintage. So caps are an obvious target. Also the old rectifiers, even if for only safety. Those old resistors tend to drift in value, so they are candidates for change.

If you want to go crazy on the amplifier stage, you might want to search out Yves ECL86 amp that was the precursor to Baby Huey.

Can you post pictures of the front and other side (ie all the iron)

dave
__________________
community sites t-linespeakers.org, frugal-horn.com ........ commercial site planet10-HiFi
p10-hifi forum here at diyA
  Reply With Quote
Old 25th February 2010, 08:35 AM   #8
diyAudio Member
 
Big John's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2010
Quote:
Originally Posted by planet10 View Post

Can you post pictures of the front and other side (ie all the iron)

dave
Attached are more photos. I was already leaning toward replacing the rectifiers, as one of the large ones in the dead amp looks a bit puffy... The dead amp, which is the older one, has Siemens rectifiers and the running amp has Semikron, both with the same reference B300 C120. I have found replacements searching that number, but I don't know that the C120 means?
Attached Images
File Type: jpg DSCN0187.JPG (395.5 KB, 274 views)
File Type: jpg DSCN0190.JPG (376.1 KB, 254 views)
File Type: jpg DSCN0191.JPG (411.3 KB, 245 views)
  Reply With Quote
Old 25th February 2010, 08:48 AM   #9
frugal-phile(tm)
diyAudio Moderator
 
planet10's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: Victoria, BC, NA, Sol III
Blog Entries: 4
Lovely amplifier.

I have dozens & dozens of those rectifier blocks. I won't use them in anything. I'd use UF4007 or maybe one of the swoopier soft recovery diodes. You want to go all out Schotkies. Eli knows more about those than i do.

If you intend max performance, I'd be looking at replacing the RCAs as well... kinda tight together thou. The usual suspects are probably too big.

dave
__________________
community sites t-linespeakers.org, frugal-horn.com ........ commercial site planet10-HiFi
p10-hifi forum here at diyA
  Reply With Quote
Old 25th February 2010, 09:54 AM   #10
diyAudio Member
 
Franz Gysi's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Hello Big John

I know the M40 pretty good and restaured some of it.

How I proceed:

- replace the Selen-rectifiers (Selen gleich-riecht-er) by silicon rectifiers
- replace the electrolytic caps in the power supply chain. Jan is a good source, you can use 100+100uF instead of 50+50. Choose 400V, better 450V types (idle voltage with silicon rectifiers)
- now, you have higher voltage because of the silicon rectfiers. I normally insert another 100uF cap and a resistor between the rectifier and the existing PSU
- attach a dummy load to the speaker outputs and measure all voltages (Ub, Ua, Uk, Ug). This is showing you possibly faulty caps or resistors. The mustard caps in my opinion are generally still reliable.

When you want help in my workshop nearby Bern, you can send me a PM.

Regards
Franz

Last edited by Franz Gysi; 25th February 2010 at 10:00 AM.
  Reply With Quote

Reply


Hide this!Advertise here!

Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
dig out (S/P-DIF, DOBM) for Philips CD100 and Revox B225 (only SAA7000 data out) tiefbassuebertr Digital Source 8 17th March 2012 09:16 PM
FS: Radio Shack 40-1354a, 40-1197, 40-1242e db6546 Swap Meet 2 26th November 2009 12:11 PM
Forte model 40 phono stage fault cc1961 Pass Labs 2 18th November 2009 09:07 PM
need a manual for selectron model 40 tube tester?? prorms Tubes / Valves 1 7th December 2008 07:48 AM


New To Site? Need Help?

All times are GMT. The time now is 05:40 AM.

Page generated in 0.12017 seconds (84.24% PHP - 15.76% MySQL) with 11 queries

Copyright ©1999-2012 diyAudio