|
|
|||||||
| Home | Forums | Rules | Articles | Store | Gallery | Blogs | Register | Donations | FAQ | Calendar | Search | Today's Posts | Mark Forums Read | Search |
| Tubes / Valves All about our sweet vacuum tubes :) Threads about Musical Instrument Amps of all kinds should be in the Instruments & Amps forum |
| diyAudio Sponsor | ||
|
|
||
|
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|
#1 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Aug 2005
|
For the tube circuit professionals...
Are these voltage amplifiers essential equivalent? To design the one on the right, what provisions should be allowed for? Thanks. peace, memphissound <>< |
|
|
|
|
#2 |
|
Banned
|
Yes they are, in an Einsteinian universe. The problem is, memphis, that they're never going to exist in isolation like this, and it depends exactly how you connect up the input and output whether you get equivalent results, and then it'll be results at AC, not DC.
To design the one on the right, one should take a course in electronics design, as the question is beyond the scope of a simple answer on a public forum. w |
|
|
|
|
#3 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Aug 2005
|
I am thinking a VAC amplifier.
I'm very familiar with basic tube audio circuits, a journeyman of tube guitar amp designs. But that type of voltage amplifier (+ and - voltage) is not something that I've ever seen in that application. But I stumbled across a design for a "tube op-amp" that used something similar with + and - voltages at the anode and cathode instead of using ground below Rk. (BTW, I'm not really interested in the op-amp application.) But if I can make it work in a MI tube pre-amp, feeding a MOSFET power section, it would make designing the PS that much easier. peace, memphissound <>< |
|
|
|
|
#4 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: Oregon
|
As long as the inputs and outputs are not DC coupled to anything else in the circuit (which should be obvious) I don't see a reason why these two shouldn't be equivalent in any universe.
The other connection to watch out for is the heater, which would be elevated if it were still referenced to ground. Some tubes have a rather stringent limit on the voltage difference allowed between heater and cathode. |
|
|
|
|
#5 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Aug 2005
|
Heater to Cathode voltage...
Let's see for a 12AX7 it's listed as 180V -- so that should be fine. Any special tips for a coupling capacitor? Or would the ubiquitous .022uf - 400V work? peace, memphissound <>< |
|
|
|
|
#6 |
|
diyAudio Member
|
The coupling capacitor combined with any resistance in the grid circuit forms a first order highpass filter, so its value will have an impact on the lower bandwidth limit of the stage.
You may want to read the PDF document at this web site, for example: http://www.freewebs.com/valvewizard1/gainstage.html Best, Kenneth
__________________
Never send a human to do a machine's job. --Agent Smith |
|
|
|
|
#7 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: Oregon
|
Indeed as kavermei says, you still have an RC circuit and must pay attention to the critical frequency, but this is no different in the two cases. If you are working from an existing design, the same capacitor will work equally as well (or poorly) in the two circuits.
|
|
|
|
|
#8 |
|
frugal-phile(tm)
diyAudio Moderator
|
The juggling of the rails on a circuit like this is used to create circuits that allow DC coupling. Taking care of the grid bias is a part of the art, as well as watching any heater issues wspecially with any dual section tube.
dave
__________________
community sites t-linespeakers.org, frugal-horn.com ........ commercial site planet10-HiFi p10-hifi forum here at diyA |
|
|
|
|
#9 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: Oregon
|
Regarding Wakibaki's original point, you do need to be careful to ensure the input isn't DC coupled at all. One easy way to do this is to use a transformer, but if you are using a typical grid resistor, this needs to be connected to the negative voltage rail (not ground) and capacitively coupled to the input. Make sure, however, that you don't inadvertently attach the input ground reference to the negative rail. That would be bad...
|
|
|
|
|
#10 |
|
Banned
|
Regarding wakibaki's original point, the inputs require to be DC coupled to somewhere. This is what determines the Operating Point, and the quiescent or DC conditions. The circuits can only be considered functionally identical at AC if they share a common operating point, although this is not the only necessary condition.
This is why I said 'in an Einsteinian universe'. The answer should probably have been 'No, not in an Einsteinian universe', since this is, after all, an Einsteinian universe. Or is it? I mean, probably? That makes it quantum mechanical. No, these circuits are not identical. Except on the days of the week that Schrödinger lets his cat out. Really? You want me to teach you electronics design by correspondence on a public forum? You must think I'm a glutton for punishment. w |
|
|
| Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|
|
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Driver Electrical equivalent circuit to design xover | andy2 | Multi-Way | 8 | 24th July 2010 08:15 AM |
| IGBT equivalent circuit? | Arroyo | Solid State | 0 | 13th April 2006 01:31 PM |
| Which Thiel-Small equivalent circuit to use? | andy2 | Multi-Way | 9 | 12th May 2005 11:46 PM |
| How can one make an equivalent circuit from parameter | andy2 | Multi-Way | 1 | 21st March 2005 06:58 AM |
| MOSFET equivalent circuit | nobody special | Solid State | 1 | 13th February 2003 06:12 PM |
| New To Site? | Need Help? |
| Page generated in 0.11971 seconds (82.69% PHP - 17.31% MySQL) with 11 queries |