|
|
|||||||
| Home | Forums | Rules | Articles | Store | Gallery | Blogs | Register | Donations | FAQ | Calendar | Search | Today's Posts | Mark Forums Read | Search |
| Tubes / Valves All about our sweet vacuum tubes :) Threads about Musical Instrument Amps of all kinds should be in the Instruments & Amps forum |
| diyAudio Sponsor | ||
|
|
||
|
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|
#1 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: Germany
|
Hello,
I would like to include a symetrical out to my preamp project. I know the easiest way is to use an output transformer driven from an catode follower. Unfortunately a reliable transformer is very expensive ( jensen transformer, 10K611M ). So using tubes should be cheaper ans with less distorion but lost the benifit od galvanic decoupling. But how to do it? Theoretical a long-tailed-pair phase inverter designed to high balanced output followed by a DC coupled cathode follower per phase should do the job. Make this sense and is this design similar to an output transformer ( excluding the galvanic decoupling ) Thanks for your input an suggestions... Best regards Karsten |
|
|
|
|
#2 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: Plainsboro, NJ
|
Along the lines you're thinking, use an ECC99 as in the LTP. Don't forget the CCS in the splitter's tail. IMO, it's much easier to use a quality enhancement mode MOSFET as the DC coupled buffer. The ECC99 triode is quite "muscular" and will have no difficulty in feeding an IRFBC20. An ID of 15 mA. will get the O/P impedance under 100 Ω.
I agree that shipping "iron" from California to Deutschland makes little sense. However, I think that the transformer option is still viable. Sowter, England, much closer to home offers products specifically for this task. Check their site out.
__________________
Eli D. |
|
|
|
|
#3 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: Germany
|
Hey Eli,
Thanks a lot for your answer Sorry, It's a little bit difficult for me to understand all these nice shortcuts like LTP/CCS ... But now I understand them, reading around the Forum. The CCS for LTP is discussed just in an other therad .. Well, to use a MOSFET as DC out buffer as you proposed looks very smart for me. Please be so kind and describe it a lite bit more detailed how to wire it. The ECC99 is a great tip! Thanks a lot for that! So a full puristic tube solution can also be to use two ECC82 valves. Two triodes wired as LTP and two as cathode follower. Zout will be in a range of 600 Ohms which is similar to transformer. Additional thanks a lot for the link to Swoter! Have a nice day.. Regards Karsten |
|
|
|
|
#4 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Nov 2006
|
You need to buy the tubes, buy the power supply components, buy the heater components, buy the auxilliary components (capacitors, sockets, etc.)... then you realise that a transformer is not so expensive!
|
|
|
|
|
#5 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: Germany
|
Hey Gordy,
well I already bought tubes, Power transformer, Power supply parts .... So the Project is in an ongoing state Nonetheless I would like to have an option. The costs are not only the big issue: I also would like to know if my consideration to use a LPT with an buffer can provide me a sufficient symmetrical out. Costs are simply to calculate: Two tube for LPT and Buffer costs ~ 20 EUR One tube plus an audio transformer will cost ~ 100 EUR Best regards Karsten |
|
|
|
|
#6 | |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: Plainsboro, NJ
|
Quote:
Karsten, Lesen Sie MOSFET Follies! Then, look at the phono preamp schematic I've uploaded. That design shows a small MOSFET DC coupled to a 12AX7/ECC83 section. You do the same thing with the big FET. Don't forget the gate stopper. IMO, the 12AU7/ECC81 is a poor voltage amplifier, due to non-linearity. I would not use it in a LTP. OTOH, it's OK as a cathode follower.
__________________
Eli D. |
|
|
|
| Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|
|
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| low zout vs output transfo | jeapel | Tubes / Valves | 6 | 6th February 2009 05:10 PM |
| going balanced/symetrical - what benefits? | weissi | Solid State | 15 | 20th October 2007 08:06 AM |
| Symetrical field, is this? | Raka | Multi-Way | 6 | 14th September 2003 01:21 PM |
| Non-symetrical SMPS output | cm961 | Parts | 4 | 21st August 2003 10:27 PM |
| Time for low Zout preamp | argo | Tubes / Valves | 40 | 11th December 2002 11:58 AM |
| New To Site? | Need Help? |
| Page generated in 0.08594 seconds (82.57% PHP - 17.43% MySQL) with 11 queries |