|
|
|||||||
| Home | Forums | Rules | Articles | Store | Gallery | Blogs | Register | Donations | FAQ | Calendar | Search | Today's Posts | Mark Forums Read | Search |
| Tubes / Valves All about our sweet vacuum tubes :) Threads about Musical Instrument Amps of all kinds should be in the Instruments & Amps forum |
| diyAudio Sponsor | ||
|
|
||
|
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|
#1 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Chicago
|
Hey all you smart tube guys,
I have been getting real interested in Balance Connections to amps lately. I have a Pass Aleph 5, Krell Clone, that have balanced inputs, and eventually building a Aleph JX... Anyway, I have been shorting the neg input to ground for single ended connections, but have been thinking of this idea to build a tube pre Concertina style to balanced XLR connections - see attachment. Is there any reason this won't work? No values are set yet, just proof on concept only. Note - I do not have a balanced source. Thinking a 6SN7, 6922 or 6N1P Input tube... If a horribly dumb idea, go easy on me, as I am very thenthitive.
__________________
"I speak Spanish to God, Italian to Women, French to Men, and German to my Horse" - Charles V Last edited by john65b; 30th January 2010 at 04:02 PM. |
|
|
|
|
#2 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Apr 2007
|
Off the top of my head:
Sure it will work and as long as both outputs are equally loaded the concertina has approx 1/gm output impedance so it should behave... if equally loaded, which probably would be where I would have my doubts-cable impedance, input impedance etc need to be perfectly balanceed otherwise both signal balance and output impedance is compromised. /Olof
__________________
I'm not allowed to do magic, union rules... |
|
|
|
|
#3 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: Eire
|
Since you have two triodes why not just a LTP. You get gain with that configuration.
Shoog |
|
|
|
|
#4 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Chicago
|
OK, so I haven't heard that it cannot, or should not, be done.
LTP version attached. Feel free to advise on additional components. Afterwards we can look at tubes and component values. I am leaning toward a 7N7 (loctal 6SN7) Again, I have read that Balanced arrangement is a waste unless the entire chain is balanced (source/Pre/Amp). Am I spinning my wheels since my source is single ended??
__________________
"I speak Spanish to God, Italian to Women, French to Men, and German to my Horse" - Charles V Last edited by john65b; 31st January 2010 at 01:44 PM. |
|
|
|
|
#5 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: UK
|
Might need a topology with a lower output impedance to drive a cable + whatever is on the other end of that XLR cable, although with a short cable length and light input impedance it might work OK. If the load is heavy, you can cheat and feel good about it by buffering the outputs of the LTP using some MOSFET source followers
|
|
|
|
|
#6 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Chicago
|
XLR Cables will be made short (a foot), and should be feeding a few amps with input impedance of between 47k and 100k
Maybe an ICEpower ASP1000 (20k-ish?) Am I correct in thinking the Concertina type would offer lower output impedance, but lower gain, while the LTP would offer higher gain and higher output impedance?
__________________
"I speak Spanish to God, Italian to Women, French to Men, and German to my Horse" - Charles V |
|
|
|
|
#7 | |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: UK
|
Quote:
The Concertina will probably drive the load just fine, but then each phase has a different output impedance (Very likely someone will correct me on this) How about going the whole hog and using two 6SN7s, one as an LTP and another as two cathode followers (one for each phase) to provide a good strong drive? |
|
|
|
|
|
#8 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: UK
|
For clarity here is a diagram (NOTE: Grid stoppers omitted)
You might want to float the heater supply on the cathode followers too, since the cathodes will be sitting at quite a high voltage, and a big heater to cathode differential is a Bad Thing
Last edited by bigwill; 31st January 2010 at 02:38 PM. |
|
|
|
|
#9 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: UK
|
The follower 6SN7s could be replaced with suitable MOSFETs too, if you want to save on tubes, which is understandable.
|
|
|
|
|
#10 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: Calgary, Alberta
|
? You'll get more gain going common cathode + concertina than taking those same 2 triodes and making an LTP.
__________________
Aerodynamics are for people who can't build engines. Enzo Ferrari |
|
|
| Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|
|
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| convert cm/dyne to um/mN | pfcs49 | Analogue Source | 3 | 10th May 2009 07:59 AM |
| Um...silly question about integrating a HT sub | GhettoSQ | Subwoofers | 9 | 3rd June 2007 01:50 PM |
| Um, I think this is bad. | Stocker | Parts | 1 | 3rd June 2005 01:18 AM |
| My first, um, thing | soneil | Chip Amps | 3 | 15th January 2004 04:37 AM |
| Um, just after a link really,... :-) | Mos Fetish | Multi-Way | 3 | 16th June 2003 08:15 PM |
| New To Site? | Need Help? |
| Page generated in 0.10560 seconds (79.29% PHP - 20.71% MySQL) with 11 queries |