Go Back   Home > Forums > Amplifiers > Tubes / Valves
Home Forums Rules Articles Store Gallery Blogs Register Donations FAQ Calendar Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read

Tubes / Valves All about our sweet vacuum tubes :) Threads about Musical Instrument Amps of all kinds should be in the Instruments & Amps forum

diyAudio Sponsor

Search for a tube at thetubestore.com                            Product reviews and more

Audio tubes for any amplifier: from high end home audio to classic guitar amps.

Quick links by tube type: 12AX7, EL34, 6L6, KT66, 6550, KT88, EL84, 12AU7, 12AT7, 6922, 6H30, 300B, 6V6, 6SN7 

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 30th January 2010, 03:57 PM   #1
john65b is offline john65b  United States
diyAudio Member
 
john65b's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Chicago
Default Um, Can I do this?

Hey all you smart tube guys,

I have been getting real interested in Balance Connections to amps lately. I have a Pass Aleph 5, Krell Clone, that have balanced inputs, and eventually building a Aleph JX...

Anyway, I have been shorting the neg input to ground for single ended connections, but have been thinking of this idea to build a tube pre Concertina style to balanced XLR connections - see attachment.

Is there any reason this won't work? No values are set yet, just proof on concept only. Note - I do not have a balanced source.

Thinking a 6SN7, 6922 or 6N1P Input tube...

If a horribly dumb idea, go easy on me, as I am very thenthitive.
Attached Images
File Type: jpg Balance pre.jpg (17.2 KB, 340 views)
__________________
"I speak Spanish to God, Italian to Women, French to Men, and German to my Horse" - Charles V

Last edited by john65b; 30th January 2010 at 04:02 PM.
  Reply With Quote
Old 30th January 2010, 04:12 PM   #2
diyAudio Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Off the top of my head:
Sure it will work and as long as both outputs are equally loaded the concertina has approx 1/gm output impedance so it should behave... if equally loaded, which probably would be where I would have my doubts-cable impedance, input impedance etc need to be perfectly balanceed otherwise both signal balance and output impedance is compromised.

/Olof
__________________
I'm not allowed to do magic, union rules...
  Reply With Quote
Old 30th January 2010, 08:04 PM   #3
diyAudio Member
 
Shoog's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: Eire
Since you have two triodes why not just a LTP. You get gain with that configuration.

Shoog
  Reply With Quote
Old 31st January 2010, 01:36 PM   #4
john65b is offline john65b  United States
diyAudio Member
 
john65b's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Chicago
OK, so I haven't heard that it cannot, or should not, be done.

LTP version attached. Feel free to advise on additional components. Afterwards we can look at tubes and component values. I am leaning toward a 7N7 (loctal 6SN7)

Again, I have read that Balanced arrangement is a waste unless the entire chain is balanced (source/Pre/Amp).

Am I spinning my wheels since my source is single ended??
Attached Images
File Type: jpg Balance pre LTP.JPG (17.8 KB, 258 views)
__________________
"I speak Spanish to God, Italian to Women, French to Men, and German to my Horse" - Charles V

Last edited by john65b; 31st January 2010 at 01:44 PM.
  Reply With Quote
Old 31st January 2010, 01:49 PM   #5
bigwill is offline bigwill  United Kingdom
diyAudio Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: UK
Might need a topology with a lower output impedance to drive a cable + whatever is on the other end of that XLR cable, although with a short cable length and light input impedance it might work OK. If the load is heavy, you can cheat and feel good about it by buffering the outputs of the LTP using some MOSFET source followers
  Reply With Quote
Old 31st January 2010, 01:56 PM   #6
john65b is offline john65b  United States
diyAudio Member
 
john65b's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Chicago
XLR Cables will be made short (a foot), and should be feeding a few amps with input impedance of between 47k and 100k

Maybe an ICEpower ASP1000 (20k-ish?)

Am I correct in thinking the Concertina type would offer lower output impedance, but lower gain, while the LTP would offer higher gain and higher output impedance?
__________________
"I speak Spanish to God, Italian to Women, French to Men, and German to my Horse" - Charles V
  Reply With Quote
Old 31st January 2010, 02:20 PM   #7
bigwill is offline bigwill  United Kingdom
diyAudio Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: UK
Quote:
Originally Posted by john65b View Post
Am I correct in thinking the Concertina type would offer lower output impedance, but lower gain, while the LTP would offer higher gain and higher output impedance?
You are correct, although driving a 47k load from the anodes of a 6SN7 in an LTP is really pushing it - a typical anode resistor for the 6SN7 is already somewhere in this order of magnitude, and if you go by the rule that the actual load resistance should be 10x that, then you will be way off!

The Concertina will probably drive the load just fine, but then each phase has a different output impedance (Very likely someone will correct me on this)

How about going the whole hog and using two 6SN7s, one as an LTP and another as two cathode followers (one for each phase) to provide a good strong drive?
  Reply With Quote
Old 31st January 2010, 02:33 PM   #8
bigwill is offline bigwill  United Kingdom
diyAudio Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: UK
For clarity here is a diagram (NOTE: Grid stoppers omitted)
You might want to float the heater supply on the cathode followers too, since the cathodes will be sitting at quite a high voltage, and a big heater to cathode differential is a Bad Thing

Click the image to open in full size.

Last edited by bigwill; 31st January 2010 at 02:38 PM.
  Reply With Quote
Old 31st January 2010, 02:44 PM   #9
bigwill is offline bigwill  United Kingdom
diyAudio Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: UK
The follower 6SN7s could be replaced with suitable MOSFETs too, if you want to save on tubes, which is understandable.
  Reply With Quote
Old 31st January 2010, 02:47 PM   #10
diyAudio Member
 
leadbelly's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: Calgary, Alberta
Quote:
Originally Posted by Shoog View Post
Since you have two triodes why not just a LTP. You get gain with that configuration.
Shoog
? You'll get more gain going common cathode + concertina than taking those same 2 triodes and making an LTP.
__________________
Aerodynamics are for people who can't build engines. Enzo Ferrari
  Reply With Quote

Reply


Hide this!Advertise here!

Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
convert cm/dyne to um/mN pfcs49 Analogue Source 3 10th May 2009 07:59 AM
Um...silly question about integrating a HT sub GhettoSQ Subwoofers 9 3rd June 2007 01:50 PM
Um, I think this is bad. Stocker Parts 1 3rd June 2005 01:18 AM
My first, um, thing soneil Chip Amps 3 15th January 2004 04:37 AM
Um, just after a link really,... :-) Mos Fetish Multi-Way 3 16th June 2003 08:15 PM


New To Site? Need Help?

All times are GMT. The time now is 05:32 AM.

Page generated in 0.10560 seconds (79.29% PHP - 20.71% MySQL) with 11 queries

Copyright ©1999-2012 diyAudio