|
|
|||||||
| Home | Forums | Rules | Articles | Store | Gallery | Blogs | Register | Donations | FAQ | Calendar | Search | Today's Posts | Mark Forums Read | Search |
| Tubes / Valves All about our sweet vacuum tubes :) Threads about Musical Instrument Amps of all kinds should be in the Instruments & Amps forum |
| diyAudio Sponsor | ||
|
|
||
|
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|
#1 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: Burlington
|
Has anyone built this amp??
RH 807 - Tube Audio ...... RH DESIGN is it as good as it looks on paper?? Also the value of the unmarked secondary ( the topmost one ) is 5v right?? Where can I get a traffo with these values?? I can't find one... Second, any recommendations for the output transformers???
__________________
Wherever you go there you are. |
|
|
|
|
#2 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: Greater Seattle Area
|
I've built a similar amp. See this thread. I used a 6LU8 TV sweep tube that contains a triode and a pentode. The amp is very cool.
For OPT's I use an Edcor XSE15-8-5k ($20/each). I have tried the CXSE25-8-5k ($70/each) as well. The latter is very good, but the former is a good place to start. The XSE15 is by far the best bang for the buck you'll find unless you find a high-quality OPT free somewhere. And yes, I believe the unmarked winding feeding the filament on the GZ34 is a 5 V winding. You can do what I do and use a spare 6.3 V winding and a series resistor. I use a 5AR4 with a 0.68 ohm series resistor and measure 5.0 V across the filament. I recommend the Antek power transformers. Excellent bang/buck ratio. ~Tom |
|
|
|
|
#3 |
|
diyAudio Member
|
It will work much better with pentode, since parallel feedback by voltage overloads triode causing higher non-linearity.
__________________
The devil is not so terrible as his mathematical model! Wavebourn: We Create Creativity! |
|
|
|
|
#4 | |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: Burlington
|
Quote:
This tube stuff is new to me...
__________________
Wherever you go there you are. |
|
|
|
|
|
#5 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: Johnson City, TN
|
That should be close enough since AnTec claims you can go 20% over without problems. You will have to use a dropping resistor (actually best to use two, one in each leg to keep the B+ Balanced) to get down from 6.3 to 5V for the filament of the rectifier tube. ( (6.3-5)/1.9 = 0.68 Ohm, use two .33 ohm two watt resistors.
You can tweek the cap and inductor values to adjust the B+ output, but it is probably fine as is. The 807 is fine up to 750V, but you may have to adjust the screen resistor to keep it at 300V per the data sheet. From a power standpoint the 4T360 is probably a better choice. Again the B+ won't be exactly 350, and you will have to tweek the screen resistor up to hold the voltage down. Higher B+ will still be well within spec for the tube, but plate dissipation is getting close to max (25W). Last edited by TheGimp; 22nd January 2010 at 01:16 PM. |
|
|
|
|
#6 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: Burlington
|
Thanks Gimp,
I'm still short a secondary though, the design calls for two 6.3v and one 5v. Is it important to keep the rectifier filament supply coming from a secondary on the same traffo? Or could I use the two 6.3v secs to heat the 8087's and ecc81 and a separate 5v transformer for the rectifier tube?
__________________
Wherever you go there you are. |
|
|
|
|
#7 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: Johnson City, TN
|
807 Filament current 0.9A * 2 = 1.8A
ECC81 Filament current (parallel at 6.3V) 0.3A Total filament requirement 2.1A No problem running all three tubes off the other 6.3V supply. They keep the input tube on a different filament supply to help isolate from noise. This is nice to do, but not totally necessary. During your construction, run seperate sets for twisted wires from the transformer to each tube filament to minimize interaction and hum pick up. |
|
|
|
|
#8 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: May 2007
Location: Eskilstuna, Sweden
|
As Wavebourn said a triode(ECC81) is unsuitable as driver in a Schade-configuration. Before distortion-cancellation it will have ca 10% distortion.
So forget the ECC81 and go for something like a 6AU6 or even better an EF280 or D3a. An run them at high current! You can also check out Pete Milletts PP and build it as SE.
__________________
Brgds Lars |
|
|
|
|
#9 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: Hickory, NC
|
A pentode driver, as Wavebourn and Revintage have suggested, is the more conventionally recommended driver for Schaded outputs. The Schading feedback has the effect of lowering the impedance greatly at the driver's plate. {Rfdbk/(output gain) paralleled with the driver load resistor} And the pentode has a high Z current source like output that drives that nicely without disturbing the pentode's internal characteristic.
But one should also keep in mind that the pentode has its own distortion problems to start with (the pentode internal transfer function operates the same as a triode with its plate stuck at some voltage, ie the screen V ). This is fixable by a high cathode degen. resistor (relative to 1/gm of the driver). (Similarly, the same fix works for a triode driver) High driver current (boosting the gm) and a high driver tube gm spec, as Lars has suggested for the pentode, also work similarly well for the triode driver setup too. The RH series seems to be designed so as to use highish driver distortion to cancel 2nd H dist. of the output tube. I would expect this to leave some noticeable 3rd and higher odd harmonic dists. But depends on the driver tube characteristics as to what finally gens up. The 12AT7 has a nearly square law characteristic (like a Mosfet, so this will be largely 2nd harmonic dist.) as can be seen by its almost linear ramp of gm versus current (and badly skewed Mu curves): http://scottbecker.net/tube/sheets/093/1/12AT7.pdf (page 4) It is interesting to compare the 12AT7 with the nearly identically spec'd normal triode in the 6LU8: http://scottbecker.net/tube/sheets/123/6/6LU8.pdf (page 4) Which has the usual curved gm curve and nearly flat Mu curves. An even more extreme case (beyond 12AT7) is the triode in the 6LQ8/6KR8: http://scottbecker.net/tube/sheets/135/6/6KR8A.pdf (page 7) Which might be interesting to try for a triode driver as well. And if that doesn't sound good, it's got a high gm pentode next door sitting ready. (switchable?) Since no one seems to have ever published the measured FFT spectra for any RH type amplifiers, the relative success of this harmonic cancelllation strategy is still a mystery. Other attempts to do so have not often been well received, but maybe they didn't use the right driver characteristic. (I would expect a conventional triode, like in the 6LU8, to produce noticeable odd harmonic additions in this Schade setup.) Don
__________________
Ohms Law V = I R |
|
|
|
|
#10 |
|
diyAudio Member
|
Hi Don;
I've found the best tube for such driver is 6Z52P (or 6J52P - hard to match Cyrillic to Latin letters - 6Ж52П). In my Pyramid-VII and Pyramid-8 amps (P-P configuration) I use couple of 6P15P tubes, with a long tail.
__________________
The devil is not so terrible as his mathematical model! Wavebourn: We Create Creativity! |
|
|
| Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|
|
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Greetings and a couple of questions | Sasquatch | Tubes / Valves | 18 | 10th February 2007 08:49 PM |
| couple of questions | slogan2112 | Multi-Way | 0 | 27th June 2004 08:38 PM |
| a couple questions | slackerbob | Solid State | 1 | 12th August 2003 02:25 AM |
| New To Site? | Need Help? |
| Page generated in 0.10980 seconds (88.68% PHP - 11.32% MySQL) with 11 queries |