|
|
|||||||
| Home | Forums | Rules | Articles | Store | Gallery | Blogs | Register | Donations | FAQ | Calendar | Search | Today's Posts | Mark Forums Read | Search |
| Tubes / Valves All about our sweet vacuum tubes :) Threads about Musical Instrument Amps of all kinds should be in the Instruments & Amps forum |
| diyAudio Sponsor | ||
|
|
||
|
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|
#1 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Sep 2009
Location: seoul
|
i bought a pair of gold pin white label amperex 6922 from a Chinese seller on ebay for half of their usual price. this is my first reason for doubt. the tube has all the right characteristics for an authentic nos including acid etched lettering, correct looking nipples, plates, getters. and yes, it does sound considerably better than the philips it replaced. however, the white labels do not rub off even when i try scratching it with my fingernails. is this possible? what tubes are they? please let me know. thank you.
|
|
|
|
|
#2 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: Macedon NY
|
Etched code near the bottom? It will tell you who made it and when. If it starts wiht a star (* - asterisk) it's US made, delta (right triangle) is Heerlen, Netherlands.
Richardson owns the trademarks "Amperex" and "Bugle Boy". They can label anything they want with those, and they aren't "fakes". But they sure aren't "NOS". |
|
|
|
|
#3 |
|
diyAudio Moderator
|
I found that out the hard way about 10yrs ago when a HK based eBay seller passed off Richardson rebranded mil surplus based "Amperex" as the real deal. (Vintage NOS) I knew the difference even then, but the seller did not disclose that these were the "new" Amperex, when I got them "disappointment" doesn't adequately describe how I or my wallet felt.. Personally I think Richardson is a pox
![]() upon the tube world..
__________________
www.kta-hifi.net |
|
|
|
|
#4 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Sep 2009
Location: seoul
|
mine has the right triangle etching and 'made in holland' printed at the top which still doesn't rub off no matter how hard i try. are you saying that even with correct etchings it can still be fakes? how can i trust anything with that kind of possibility...
|
|
|
|
|
#5 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: Macedon NY
|
I'd believe the etched codes and internal construction. Those wouldn't be worth faking... anyway, most "fakes" aren't - they're relabeled by the maker whose name is on it.
|
|
|
| Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|
|
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Is this interview authentic? | ashok | Everything Else | 9 | 11th August 2008 02:52 AM |
| Authentic TDA1541A | dantwomey | Digital Source | 18 | 1st March 2008 01:13 AM |
| Rub On Letter Sources. | Geek | Parts | 14 | 4th April 2007 04:01 PM |
| FS: NOS Amperex 7308 (6dj8/6922) PQ | dsavitsk | Swap Meet | 0 | 12th May 2006 12:39 AM |
| wipe / rub on photoresist? | bigpanda | Everything Else | 6 | 29th September 2005 10:27 AM |
| New To Site? | Need Help? |
| Page generated in 0.07171 seconds (78.84% PHP - 21.16% MySQL) with 10 queries |