|
|
|||||||
| Home | Forums | Rules | Articles | Store | Gallery | Blogs | Register | Donations | FAQ | Calendar | Search | Today's Posts | Mark Forums Read | Search |
| Tubes / Valves All about our sweet vacuum tubes :) Threads about Musical Instrument Amps of all kinds should be in the Instruments & Amps forum |
| diyAudio Sponsor | ||
|
|
||
|
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|
#1 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Dec 2009
Location: Md
|
Thought I't throw up some numbers, before and after replacing the 6N2's with 6AX7's. Note that by adjusting the symmetry, I already cut the second order in half.
6AX7, 1Khz, 2.7V out. 6N2 Right Left Right Left Second .081 .181% .504 .256 Third .418 1.105 1.242 1.143 Fourth .029 .008 .085 .023 Fifth .017 .218 .282 .225 Noise floor with the 6AX7's was about 5 dB lower and gain about 1 dB higher. Lots to understand, like why the size of difference right vs left. I have not swapped anything R for L to see if it is tube or passive components. Considering I started with over 2% second on both sides, not too bad. That third is a problem! I am a bit confused as the symmetry effected only the second, where the ligature I read said it should effect the third. |
|
|
|
|
#2 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Dec 2009
Location: Md
|
Messed up the formatting! took out my spaces.
Anyway, 4 columns 6AX7 R & L, 6N2 R & L |
|
|
| Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|
|
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Geddes on distortion measurements | MBK | Solid State | 239 | 15th August 2010 08:33 PM |
| How to do IM distortion measurements? | Conrad Hoffman | Parts | 1 | 28th May 2007 06:09 PM |
| Distortion measurements | Vg | Multi-Way | 5 | 13th August 2004 11:32 AM |
| New To Site? | Need Help? |
| Page generated in 0.06404 seconds (72.28% PHP - 27.72% MySQL) with 10 queries |