|
|
|||||||
| Home | Forums | Rules | Articles | Store | Gallery | Blogs | Register | Donations | FAQ | Calendar | Search | Today's Posts | Mark Forums Read | Search |
| Tubes / Valves All about our sweet vacuum tubes :) Threads about Musical Instrument Amps of all kinds should be in the Instruments & Amps forum |
| diyAudio Sponsor | ||
|
|
||
|
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|
#1 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Norway
|
If I make the primary load equal to the plate resistance (Rload=rp), DF should be 1. At the secondary side DF should be 1 or less than 1 if we add up Rdc in the transformer. Why is SE Cad telling me that DF is greater than 1 and Zout is less than 8 ohms?
As far as I can see, the transformer has an 8 ohms secondary (10.9 ratio = 950/8). Could someone please explain why SE Cad calculates such generous output impedance? ![]() Jan E Veiset
__________________
Life is hard - Then you die. |
|
|
|
|
#2 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: Hickory, NC
|
I haven't used SE Cad, but I see a Plate Zo figure of 475 Ohms listed. Maybe the operating point is at a different current than the tube's spec point for the 949 Ohm?
Don
__________________
Ohms Law V = I R |
|
|
|
|
#3 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Oct 2005
|
I have not used John Broskie's SE Amp CAD either.
Id seems that it calculates the Z-out from the tube as Rp in parallel with the load Rl. This is as as I understand as per textbook learning - if were to measure at this point. When we measure at the secondary load, the level with no load is twice the level with 8 ohm load. This should indicate that the internal output impedance is around 8 ohm. I have simulated this in LtSpice to confirm my estimate. When we apply a signal to the output load from another generator (with no input signal to the amp), 1 V with an internal impdance of 1k, we measure 4mv across the load, idicating that the output impedance is in fact about 4 ohm as predicted by John Broskies program. SveinB. Last edited by Svein_B; 26th December 2009 at 04:00 PM. |
|
|
|
|
#4 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Norway
|
You are right. The value Plate Zo is rp in parallel with Rl (dcR included) and these value (Plate Zo) is used to calculate the output impedance and DF.
If I reduce dcR in the transformer to a minimum (still with rp=Rl), output impedance is calculated to 4 ohm / DF=2. Nice result, but I wouldn't call it output impedance [1]. With the load included in the calculations, DF will never be less than 1. Jan E Veiset [1] Output impedance - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
__________________
Life is hard - Then you die. |
|
|
|
|
#5 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: Hickory, NC
|
"indicating that the output impedance is in fact about 4 ohm"
I assume this was measured with the load connected. In that case it would look like an 8 Ohm output Z in parallel with the 8 Ohm load giving the 4 Ohm result. But the definition of damping factor is Zload/Zsource (or Zload /Zout) so the damping factor should be around 1 (8/8). ?
__________________
Ohms Law V = I R |
|
|
| Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|
|
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Wrong Voltage / current on BoZ... or Wrong Measuring ? | gionag | Pass Labs | 8 | 14th May 2008 11:24 AM |
| Cary Cad-300b Se | kmtang | Tubes / Valves | 23 | 21st December 2007 11:00 PM |
| What CAD? | ak_47_boy | Everything Else | 6 | 6th January 2007 10:19 PM |
| Cad Sw | batinal | Tubes / Valves | 4 | 17th February 2006 01:45 AM |
| CAD Audio | km | Swap Meet | 2 | 20th September 2004 07:56 PM |
| New To Site? | Need Help? |
| Page generated in 0.07890 seconds (77.49% PHP - 22.51% MySQL) with 10 queries |