|
|
|||||||
| Home | Forums | Rules | Articles | Store | Gallery | Blogs | Register | Donations | FAQ | Calendar | Search | Today's Posts | Mark Forums Read | Search |
| Tubes / Valves All about our sweet vacuum tubes :) Threads about Musical Instrument Amps of all kinds should be in the Instruments & Amps forum |
| diyAudio Sponsor | ||
|
|
||
|
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|
#1 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Jul 2008
|
Have never used a CCS before despite members swearing by them.
Hooked up a CCS on the anode of one of my simple common cathode linestages. Using a SV83 as the CCS. OK maybe inefficient but not worried about that. Getting a nice stable 190V from the CCS. Very nice indeed. Bass amongst other things significantly improved. Never had much success using 6N1P's but now it really shines with the CCS on the plate. Also replaced the cathode resistor/cap bypass with some yellow leds. Got a perfect 1.85V on both cathodes. |
|
|
|
|
#3 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Sep 2004
|
Congrats!
Try a CCS on some "worthless tee vee toobs" as well and you'll hear the magic genie come out of the bottle ![]() Cheers! |
|
|
|
|
#4 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Jul 2008
|
Thxs SY/Geek.
Trying a variety of music and really liking this. I had an issue with humming before thinking the transformer was damaged, but it seems to have cleared up using the CCS. Strange. Now to try with some different tubes But the lady of the house wants to go out ![]() Well an excuse to enjoy my classic alfa romeo and hear those sweet weber carbs singing. |
|
|
|
|
#5 |
|
diyAudio Moderator
|
Using a CCS will dramatically improve the power supply rejection, so that may be why you have less hum.
__________________
“Listening to records is like ****ing a picture of Brigitte Bardot.” - Sergiu Celibidache |
|
|
|
|
#6 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Jul 2008
|
QQ
mu stage Looking at this article above I see he takes the output of the gain stage between the cathode of the CCS penthode and RK2 (V2's cathode resistor) at the point where the cap is. I am taking it off from the point below the cathode resistor. What difference would this make? So far I'm getting good results. (took the CCS design from Pete Millets low mu amp). |
|
|
|
|
#7 |
|
tarmac ripper
diyAudio Member
|
It depends on what you are driving. BTW I did always prefer the plate output. Give solid state CCS a try, you will never come back.
Gianluca |
|
|
|
|
#8 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Jul 2008
|
So I'm assuming we take the output from the plate or above the cathode resistor depending on how hard it is to drive?
|
|
|
|
|
#9 |
|
diyAudio Moderator Emeritus
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: U.K.
|
I think the cathode point has a much lower impedance, so is preferable.
My amp OnRyoku 845SE does this. |
|
|
|
|
#10 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Jul 2008
|
tweeked design:
my best sounding amp to date. Correction. R5 is 910 ohms Holco. |
|
|
| Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|
|
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| CCS Conceptual Qs, Using Gary Pimm CCS as Example | DrDeville | Tubes / Valves | 20 | 12th May 2004 02:41 PM |
| Nice to see you all | Sandy H. | Introductions | 6 | 6th November 2002 08:16 AM |
| Oh ya, it's nice to have.... | Rino odorico | Everything Else | 12 | 4th November 2002 07:54 PM |
| New To Site? | Need Help? |
| Page generated in 0.10630 seconds (78.04% PHP - 21.96% MySQL) with 11 queries |