diyAudio

diyAudio (http://www.diyaudio.com/forums/)
-   Tubes / Valves (http://www.diyaudio.com/forums/tubes-valves/)
-   -   Tube-I-zator SRPP DAC I/V-Stage circuit discussions (http://www.diyaudio.com/forums/tubes-valves/156529-tube-i-zator-srpp-dac-i-v-stage-circuit-discussions.html)

dvb projekt 10th December 2009 07:38 AM

Tube-I-zator SRPP DAC I/V-Stage circuit discussions
 
Hi to all,

Because of the big success of the I/V SRPP Tube Stage in my finished 4x TDA-1541A DAC,
i am planning a PCB Group Buy for those who want to have a optical and technical perfect solution.

Because i am no technical guru who could answer Tube circuit details,
i would like to open this new thread to discuss questions arround this SRPP-Stage.

http://img705.imageshack.us/img705/1...heaterswit.png


The values of the resistors in the SRPP Stage are for use with a 6N2P Tube but could be changed for other tubes.



Best regards,
dvb-projekt

Bas Horneman 10th December 2009 08:44 AM

The schematic is a bit hard to read like this. But the first thing I noticed is the small value grid leak (R5/R7)? Should be 100k or larger. And I would add a grid leak to the output as well.

dvb projekt 10th December 2009 09:33 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Bas Horneman (Post 2008415)
The schematic is a bit hard to read like this. But the first thing I noticed is the small value grid leak (R5/R7)? Should be 100k or larger. And I would add a grid leak to the output as well.

Hi Bas,

:eek: i forgot to write that the 28R are the I/V value for my 4xTDA1541 DAC...

Surely this resistor value depends on the DAC you will use (Tolerance +10/-50%):

1x TDA1541A: 90R ; AD185x: 500R ; PCM 56/58: 500R
2x TDA1541A: 60R ; AD1862: 500R ; PCM 63: 100R
4x TDA1541A: 28R ; AD1864: 250R ; PCM 170x: 100R ; 2x PCM170X: 55R

Bas Horneman 10th December 2009 09:51 AM

Quote:

i forgot to write that the 28R are the I/V value for my 4xTDA1541 DAC...
Ofcourse! Duh. Forgot that that is your I/V resistor.

revintage 10th December 2009 10:38 AM

Why the light load on the 1541? Normally we see ca 30ohm/dac to avoid distortion.

And why SRPP? Even Broskie who have talked so much about this circuit dumped it years ago. At these very low signal-levels it might not be noted but PP makes uneven harmonics be dominant and the circuit is also load-sensitive.

But as you have found it well-sounding, go for it!

dvb projekt 10th December 2009 11:33 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by revintage (Post 2008479)
Why the light load on the 1541? Normally we see ca 30ohm/dac to avoid distortion.

And why SRPP? Even Broskie who have talked so much about this circuit dumped it years ago. At these very low signal-levels it might not be noted but PP makes uneven harmonics be dominant and the circuit is also load-sensitive.

But as you have found it well-sounding, go for it!

Hi Lars,

as a simple Tube-Buffer-Stage with only a few needed parts instead of a normal SS Buffer-Stage and the resultant advantages , it runs like hell in my DAC.
I had absolute no problems at all and the circuit is well proven as a great upgrade to standard Output-Stages in CDPīs and DACīs.

I absolute agree that you could make many various stages at this point, but i opened this thread to discuss questions around this SRPP-Stage.

Best regards,
Oliver

revintage 10th December 2009 11:43 AM

Hey Oliver,
Can absolutely understand that you find tubes superior against SS:D.

Just curious , have you tried lower I/V resistors? 100ohm is where you get unacceptable distortion, 90ohm seems to close. But of course you get higher output level.

dvb projekt 10th December 2009 01:07 PM

I for myself not, because of 4 TDA´s.
Get it as indication value.

revintage 10th December 2009 03:14 PM

Quote:

i forgot to write that the 28R are the I/V value for my 4xTDA1541 DAC...
If that is for four parallelled 1541īs it means 112ohm/DAC. Far above what is said to give gross distortion. Typo:)? If 28ohm is for each DAC it is close to what is commonly seen. Also checked the Lamp-guy and he recommends 60-80ohm/DAC.

dvb projekt 10th December 2009 05:16 PM

With the 28R resistor it is hard on the edge, yes. But it works well :o

But thatīs why i started the thread, to talk about things in the circuit. :D

Every opinion is welcome.


All times are GMT. The time now is 10:36 PM.


vBulletin Optimisation provided by vB Optimise (Pro) - vBulletin Mods & Addons Copyright © 2014 DragonByte Technologies Ltd.
Copyright Đ1999-2014 diyAudio


Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO 3.3.2