|
|
|||||||
| Home | Forums | Rules | Articles | Store | Gallery | Blogs | Register | Donations | FAQ | Calendar | Search | Today's Posts | Mark Forums Read | Search |
| Tubes / Valves All about our sweet vacuum tubes :) Threads about Musical Instrument Amps of all kinds should be in the Instruments & Amps forum |
| diyAudio Sponsor | ||
|
|
||
|
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|
#1 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Aug 2006
|
'Hope the following image is legible...
![]() A is the typical choke pi filter. B has the choke on the ground side. C has both. I can't model either B or C in PSUD (as far as I can tell anyway). So a few questions: 1. Is there any disadvantage to B? It seems like a good option for situation when choke doesn't have a high enough voltage rating. 2. Does C have any advantage over A or B? Or would two such chokes, say of equal inductance, be equivalent to having one choke (as in either A or B) of twice the inductance? Thanks for any help. |
|
|
|
|
#2 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Oct 2006
|
There is not really any disadvantage to B, in fact it is chosen for the very reason you cite. Of course, circuit common must come off the negative end of the second filter cap.
C might be a tad bit advantageous in reducing common mode noise, but power chokes are somewhat limited in their ability to block RF. C is what I use in my preamp. For the purposes of PSUD, there is no difference between A and B, and to model C you add the inductances of each individual choke, modeling it exactly the same as A and B. |
|
|
|
|
#3 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Oct 2004
|
|
|
|
|
|
#4 |
|
diyAudio Member
|
One Electron also makes dual wound chokes and I have a few of them. I never thought to use them like the above Emission Labs diagram. Interesting.
__________________
My religion is the golden rule. The only time it's forsaken me is when I've forsaken it first. |
|
|
|
|
#5 | |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Midwest
|
Quote:
However, if C used a single core with dual windings, it would act as a common-mode choke as illustrated by nicoch46. |
|
|
|
|
|
#6 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Aug 2006
|
|
|
|
|
|
#7 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Oct 2004
|
more info
|
|
|
|
|
#8 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Midwest
|
Yes, that is the correct use of the common-mode choke.
|
|
|
| Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|
|
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Temp Variations CH to CH | Zero Cool | Everything Else | 0 | 4th February 2007 01:25 PM |
| Q: The Zen Variations Book | Michael Rothacher | Pass Labs | 5 | 5th March 2004 05:14 PM |
| Zen Variations 5 | Nelson Pass | Pass Labs | 66 | 5th August 2003 04:57 PM |
| Zen Variations part 4 | Nelson Pass | Pass Labs | 34 | 29th August 2002 11:23 PM |
| Zen & Zen Variations-Part.2 | billy | Pass Labs | 1 | 7th August 2002 06:24 PM |
| New To Site? | Need Help? |
| Page generated in 0.09360 seconds (76.13% PHP - 23.87% MySQL) with 11 queries |