|
|
|||||||
| Home | Forums | Rules | Articles | Store | Gallery | Blogs | Register | Donations | FAQ | Calendar | Search | Today's Posts | Mark Forums Read | Search |
| Tubes / Valves All about our sweet vacuum tubes :) Threads about Musical Instrument Amps of all kinds should be in the Instruments & Amps forum |
| diyAudio Sponsor | ||
|
|
||
|
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|
#1 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: Wellington NZ
|
I can get my hands a good looking PP 6L6 amp. However I've got the impression that the output transformers are relatively small and have been thinking about replacing the 6L6 with 6V6.
With Google I found a guitar thread that discussed this swap but this is a standard amp intended for stereo use. I read that the feedback loop needs to be moved from the 4 Ohm connection to the 8 Ohm connection and that the 4 Ohm speaker connection becomes the 8 Ohm speaker connection to make up for the changes in feedback requirements and increased impedance. Is this a feasable route to take or is it better to ditch this idea and perhaps some can chime in what the impact on the performance of the amp may be? Many thanks for your inputs. |
|
|
|
|
#3 | |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: Plainsboro, NJ
|
Quote:
Another tweak that caters to the lack of "iron" bulk is installing a 1 pole high pass filter at the amp's I/Ps, with F3 tuned just below 20 Hz. Keeping infrasonic trash out of the amp provides protection against O/P trafo core saturation.
__________________
Eli D. |
|
|
|
|
|
#4 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: Wellington NZ
|
Eli, thanks for the suggestion. I've gone ahead an ordered the amplifier (MeiXing MC34-B) after I had a good read up about the characteristics of the 6L6 series and studying the tubecharts. Looks to be the 6V6's bigger brother and a darn fine tube. Time will tell.
Was unable to find specific details on a 6L6 in PP triode mode, only item I did find was someone remarking he got 6 W out in this mode (enough for me). I always regretted selling the Leak that I restored (EL84's and very large OPT's) and I hope that I be able to get something that gets close. There are some discussions about PP missing the second harmonic distorting the waterfull decay of the intermodulation and that the ECC81 is rich in 2nd harmonic. I also picked up suggestions that the selected drivers are not the best. While I am waiting for the amp to arrive I'll be looking at modification options and wonder what the best bang for the buck may be. Have some Russian 6N2P-EV and 6N3P-EV as well I have somewhere a rather new ECC83 and some OK ECC82's. One thing I like to try out is the triode modification but am relucatant to do this without tube (factory) specifications lets I go over the ratings for g2. If you have any suggestions then I would greatly appreciate those. Thanks. |
|
|
|
|
#5 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: Plainsboro, NJ
|
Yes, the 6L6 is venerable. It's the very 1st beam power tetrode and has been produced continuously, in 1 incarnation or another, since RCA introduced it in the 1930s. Hats off to THE longevity champion.
6L6GCs are the "norm", these days. Between the GE and RCA data sheets, you'll be quite busy. An interesting fact about the 6L6 is that it is specifically rated for a positive grid current regime. You can squeeze a fair amount of power out of a triode wired pair in either A2 or AB2. As I stated previously, the 6L6 has substantial drive requirements. I'd go for a Mullard circuit using a 12AT7/ECC81 section as the voltage amplifier and an ECC99 as the LTP. If you opt for positive grid current, buffer the LTP with IRFBC20 source followers DC coupled to the control grids of the "finals". Circuits with GNFB loops should (IMO) be executed with high gm types, to obtain resistance against slew limiting. The types I suggested are high gm.
__________________
Eli D. |
|
|
|
|
#6 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: Wellington NZ
|
Eli, Thanks for that info, much appreciated. Have heard some suggestions of changing the Chinese tubes for something else. Quite some conflicting information on the web and a lot is from people that are "wannabee". I rather go by the opinion of someone like yoursself: are there any 6L6GC that I have to stay away from and any that you recommend without going overboard? Thanks.
|
|
|
|
|
#7 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: Brisbane QLD
|
Amadeus, did you get the amp and change the tubes? Just wondering as I have one too and fitted 6V6 recently (Russian 6P6S). The OPT's on my amp were around 3K9 a-a for 8 ohm loads and 5K3 for 4 ohm loads. I fitted some 8K OPT's and they sound great with the 6P6S, and the power tranny now runs a lot cooler.
|
|
|
| Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|
|
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Help needed replacing foam surrounds on SEAS CA25FEY | Ian J | Multi-Way | 3 | 16th November 2009 04:51 PM |
| replacing Dac | freakyone | Digital Source | 1 | 24th November 2008 10:49 AM |
| Urgent help needed with replacing output devices | Sampsa | Solid State | 6 | 12th October 2008 03:29 AM |
| Replacing 50K pot with 10K pot | KevinLee | Parts | 10 | 10th December 2007 03:50 AM |
| Replacing IRFZ42 in Alpine 3558 advice needed....(pics) | maxw | Car Audio | 20 | 8th July 2005 07:16 PM |
| New To Site? | Need Help? |
| Page generated in 1.56512 seconds (8.07% PHP - 91.93% MySQL) with 10 queries |