SS Followers to drive power tubes - diyAudio
Go Back   Home > Forums > Amplifiers > Tubes / Valves
Home Forums Rules Articles diyAudio Store Gallery Wiki Blogs Register Donations FAQ Calendar Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read

Tubes / Valves All about our sweet vacuum tubes :) Threads about Musical Instrument Amps of all kinds should be in the Instruments & Amps forum

Please consider donating to help us continue to serve you.

Ads on/off / Custom Title / More PMs / More album space / Advanced printing & mass image saving
Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 16th November 2009, 04:26 AM   #1
diyAudio Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Adelaide South Oz
Default SS Followers to drive power tubes

Guys,
I am using ZVN0545A MOSFET Source followers (direct coupled) to drive output tube grid 1 (with the output tube bias applied to the mosfet gate). I use a "Ring of Two" BJT current source for the source load.
I recently saw an article (which I can no longer find) where it was suggested that a bipolar emitter follower would do a better job than the MOSFET source follower in this duty.

Can anyone confirm, refute, offer a WAG as to whether this is indeed correct?

Thanks,
Ian
  Reply With Quote
Old 16th November 2009, 05:35 AM   #2
diyAudio Member
 
Miles Prower's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2005
Location: USA
Blog Entries: 7
Quote:
Originally Posted by gingertube View Post
Guys,
I am using ZVN0545A MOSFET Source followers (direct coupled) to drive output tube grid 1 (with the output tube bias applied to the mosfet gate). I use a "Ring of Two" BJT current source for the source load.
I recently saw an article (which I can no longer find) where it was suggested that a bipolar emitter follower would do a better job than the MOSFET source follower in this duty.

Can anyone confirm, refute, offer a WAG as to whether this is indeed correct?

Thanks,
Ian
If the driven grids stay in Class *1, it really doesn't make much difference. If the grids are driven positive, then it does make a big difference. For emitter followers, the input impedance is dependent on the load impedance. That's why you often see cascaded emitter followers used when you want a Hi-Z input. What you don't want happening is that varying load on the stage that connects to the emitter followers. This is why FETs are preferred for grid drivers: the input impedance doesn't vary with a steeply varying load, which is what Class *2 grids are.
__________________
There are no foxes in atheistholes
www.dolphin-hsl.com
  Reply With Quote
Old 16th November 2009, 07:54 AM   #3
Yvesm is offline Yvesm  France
diyAudio Member
 
Yvesm's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Ardeche
Hi Ian and Miles,

In other words, you must provide a base current equal to the expected grid current divided by the beta of the BJT.
And yes, it will vary !

Yves.
  Reply With Quote
Old 16th November 2009, 08:10 AM   #4
Jaap is offline Jaap  Netherlands
diyAudio Member
 
Jaap's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: Netherlands
If I remember well I read somewhere that Allen Wright thinks that tubes sound better than SS around the position of a cathode follower. Would it be a good idea to have the Wright/Rasmussen all tube SLCF before outputtubes in a pp amp ? Or is this restricted to pre-amp territory ? Like to try that some day.
  Reply With Quote
Old 16th November 2009, 04:24 PM   #5
R.I.P.
 
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: Schaffhausen Switzerland
I believe you'd need a very large amount of output tubes to go to the bother of adding SLCFs to drive them.

Our dpa300b amps get by with a cascoded 6H30 running at 15mA very nicely - and even our new 150 watt amp with paralleled push-pull KT88s also uses cascoded 6H30's, although now at 20mA.

KISS is my key principle in signal path design, and I'd never add an extra stage unless essential.

Regarding MOSFETs, my opinion is that they have NO PLACE in an audio signal path, either as source followers or gain elements - NONE!

Regards, Allen
  Reply With Quote
Old 16th November 2009, 05:38 PM   #6
Zen Mod is online now Zen Mod  Serbia
diyAudio Member
 
Zen Mod's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: ancient Batsch , behind Iron Curtain
Quote:
Originally Posted by Allen Wright View Post
.......

Regarding MOSFETs, my opinion is that they have NO PLACE in an audio signal path, either as source followers or gain elements - NONE!

Regards, Allen
you are old enough and toobie enough to have all my respect and love ..... - but say that to Papa ........

I had impression that topology is always more important in your designs than parts ...... so I'm kinda surprised



in any case - your writings regarding Tectronix-SLCF topology urged me (many moons ago) to try any (known to me ) active part in that manner , and for my ears what you wrote is true - dang above that cascode , dang bellow that CCS - and active part is invisible

__________________
my Papa is smarter than your Nelson !
clean thread; Cook Book;PSM LS Cook Book;Baby DiyA ;Mighty ZM's Bloggg;Papatreasure;Papa... by Mighty ZM
  Reply With Quote
Old 16th November 2009, 09:50 PM   #7
R.I.P.
 
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: Schaffhausen Switzerland
Zen Mod,
>>I had impression that topology is always more important in your designs than parts ...... so I'm kinda surprised<<

So was I. I thoght theMOSFET'd SLCF was just fine, until I made up the all tube version - and then I heard the difference!

>>in any case - your writings regarding Tectronix-SLCF topology urged me (many moons ago) to try any (known to me ) active part in that manner , and for my ears what you wrote is true - dang above that cascode , dang bellow that CCS - and active part is invisible <<

Sorry, don't quite follow you here - you mean you like the MOSFET in thr SLCF or you don't?

Regards, Allen
  Reply With Quote
Old 16th November 2009, 09:58 PM   #8
SY is offline SY  United States
diyAudio Moderator
 
SY's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: Chicagoland
Blog Entries: 2
Curiously, I went the other way- I used to use tubes for driving AB2 output stages, but got much better results when I switched to MOSFETs.

Of course for screen drive, most CFs will curl up and die. It takes a MOSFET to deliver the current punch necessary. I've seen comparative results with tubes appropriate for that service (like 6S45), and the MOSFET still wins.
__________________
Remember: life is ten per cent what happens to you, ten per cent how you respond to it, and eighty per cent how good your reflexes are when the Tall Ones come at your throat with their pincers.
  Reply With Quote
Old 16th November 2009, 10:03 PM   #9
Zen Mod is online now Zen Mod  Serbia
diyAudio Member
 
Zen Mod's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: ancient Batsch , behind Iron Curtain
Quote:
Originally Posted by Allen Wright View Post
........

Sorry, don't quite follow you here - you mean you like the MOSFET in thr SLCF or you don't?

Regards, Allen
I liked even "all mosfet" SLSourceFollower
__________________
my Papa is smarter than your Nelson !
clean thread; Cook Book;PSM LS Cook Book;Baby DiyA ;Mighty ZM's Bloggg;Papatreasure;Papa... by Mighty ZM
  Reply With Quote
Old 16th November 2009, 10:06