Hi,
Yes, plus it contains a pair of diodes and requires a different socket (B7G), the 6AV6 I mean.
I remember looking for 1/2 6SL7 years ago and could find any, which doesn't mean there aren't any.
The SL7 has an Ra of 44K whereas the 12AX7 has 62K.
Cheers,
6AV6 is a half a 12AX7. Closest I can think of, it has higher mu and Rp I think.
Yes, plus it contains a pair of diodes and requires a different socket (B7G), the 6AV6 I mean.
I remember looking for 1/2 6SL7 years ago and could find any, which doesn't mean there aren't any.
The SL7 has an Ra of 44K whereas the 12AX7 has 62K.
Cheers,
Cdeveza,
I don't think such a beast exists. However, I often use the 6SL7 - it's one of the best high mu tubes around, with a lovely sound and huge soundstage. I T-bar the two sections - with no loss of quality I can detect - that is, connect the two plates, the two cathodes, and connect two 1K grid stoppers, with each to a grid.
In this role the tube delivers an rp of 22K, mu of 70, and I use a 50K combined plate load. With 175V on the plate it runs 3.36mA, and has quite good drive. If your application can tolerate using the one tube for a single voltage amplifier amplification, this is the way I'd do it.
Cheers,
Hugh
I don't think such a beast exists. However, I often use the 6SL7 - it's one of the best high mu tubes around, with a lovely sound and huge soundstage. I T-bar the two sections - with no loss of quality I can detect - that is, connect the two plates, the two cathodes, and connect two 1K grid stoppers, with each to a grid.
In this role the tube delivers an rp of 22K, mu of 70, and I use a 50K combined plate load. With 175V on the plate it runs 3.36mA, and has quite good drive. If your application can tolerate using the one tube for a single voltage amplifier amplification, this is the way I'd do it.
Cheers,
Hugh
CAREFUL...
High Hugh,
For that to work without penalty both halves need to be perfectly matched...
I use that kind of configuration with a 6DJ8 type of headamp (MC Hammer) CCS loaded, and matching all section of two twin triodes per channel is a bit of a headache.
Pros are halve Ra, doubled Gm, halved req but...current hogging may occur...
It's a bit like putting caps in //, they're notoriously tough to perfectly share current creating a see saw effect on the whole circuit...
Well, not just caps...you know what I mean.
Cheers,
High Hugh,
For that to work without penalty both halves need to be perfectly matched...
I use that kind of configuration with a 6DJ8 type of headamp (MC Hammer) CCS loaded, and matching all section of two twin triodes per channel is a bit of a headache.
Pros are halve Ra, doubled Gm, halved req but...current hogging may occur...
It's a bit like putting caps in //, they're notoriously tough to perfectly share current creating a see saw effect on the whole circuit...
Well, not just caps...you know what I mean.
Cheers,
AKSA said:Cdeveza,
I don't think such a beast exists. However, I often use the 6SL7 - it's one of the best high mu tubes around, with a lovely sound and huge soundstage. I T-bar the two sections - with no loss of quality I can detect - that is, connect the two plates, the two cathodes, and connect two 1K grid stoppers, with each to a grid.
In this role the tube delivers an rp of 22K, mu of 70, and I use a 50K combined plate load. With 175V on the plate it runs 3.36mA, and has quite good drive. If your application can tolerate using the one tube for a single voltage amplifier amplification, this is the way I'd do it.
Cheers,
Hugh
Also worth noting, 6SU7 same as per 6SL7 but better
matched sections, works excellent for paralleling
sections.
Cheers,
Terry
DAMN....
Hi,
Sigh...I'm not alone anymore knowing this...
Thanks for sharing, Terry...can I invoice you for my loss?
Cheers,
Hi,
Also worth noting, 6SU7 same as per 6SL7 but better
Sigh...I'm not alone anymore knowing this...
Thanks for sharing, Terry...can I invoice you for my loss?
Cheers,
Thanks guys
Thanks to all, I will check all recommendations out. I actually have a driver circuit for a 300B that is composed of 6SL7 and 6BL7 in a cascade configuration, with the 6BL7 as cathode follower that drives the 300B's. I happened to like this circuit very much, very musical. I use half of both tubes to serve each channel. I know a lot of people does not like this, but I never had any problem. Now, what I wanted to do is to build a mono-block amp using this circuit and I hate to just use one section of a tube.
Well, I guess I may have to use the closest tube and readjust the circuit for optimum performance.
Alex Deveza
Thanks to all, I will check all recommendations out. I actually have a driver circuit for a 300B that is composed of 6SL7 and 6BL7 in a cascade configuration, with the 6BL7 as cathode follower that drives the 300B's. I happened to like this circuit very much, very musical. I use half of both tubes to serve each channel. I know a lot of people does not like this, but I never had any problem. Now, what I wanted to do is to build a mono-block amp using this circuit and I hate to just use one section of a tube.
Well, I guess I may have to use the closest tube and readjust the circuit for optimum performance.
Alex Deveza
Re: Thanks guys
Why not use one envelope per side (for each of the SL7 and BL7), with only one triode actually wired into circuit. Use half A in the left, anf half B in the right, and swap the tubes between channels every so often.
cdeveza said:Now, what I wanted to do is to build a mono-block amp using this circuit and I hate to just use one section of a tube.
Well, I guess I may have to use the closest tube and readjust the circuit for optimum performance.
Alex Deveza
Why not use one envelope per side (for each of the SL7 and BL7), with only one triode actually wired into circuit. Use half A in the left, anf half B in the right, and swap the tubes between channels every so often.
cdeveza said:Brett,
Well, that is exactly what I meant on my last post that I would like to prevent.
Alex Deveza
Curious as to why. Same number of bottles, betcha the same or close to the same filament power required, probably easier to source and replace tubes etc.
Re: Thanks guys
Brett,
I thought that was the point - hard to split one between 2 monoblocks
Cheers,
Brett,
cdeveza said:snipNow, what I wanted to do is to build a mono-block amp using this circuit and I hate to just use one section of a tube.
snip
Alex Deveza
I thought that was the point - hard to split one between 2 monoblocks
Cheers,
Re: Re: Thanks guys
John,
You're not paying attention. In the left monoblock, use a 6BL7, of which you use triode section 1, with section 2 being unused. In the right monoblock, use <i>another</i> 6BL7 which is wired with triode section 2 used and section 1 not used. Periodically swap the different 6BL7 bottles between the different monoblocks to even up the hours of useage on each section. Ditto with the 6SL7's.
Make sense now?
dhaen said:Brett,
I thought that was the point - hard to split one between 2 monoblocks
John,
You're not paying attention. In the left monoblock, use a 6BL7, of which you use triode section 1, with section 2 being unused. In the right monoblock, use <i>another</i> 6BL7 which is wired with triode section 2 used and section 1 not used. Periodically swap the different 6BL7 bottles between the different monoblocks to even up the hours of useage on each section. Ditto with the 6SL7's.
Make sense now?
- Status
- This old topic is closed. If you want to reopen this topic, contact a moderator using the "Report Post" button.
- Home
- Amplifiers
- Tubes / Valves
- Single section equivalent of 6SL7