|
Home | Forums | Rules | Articles | diyAudio Store | Blogs | Gallery | Wiki | Register | Donations | FAQ | Calendar | Search | Today's Posts | Mark Forums Read | Search |
Tubes / Valves All about our sweet vacuum tubes :) Threads about Musical Instrument Amps of all kinds should be in the Instruments & Amps forum |
|
Please consider donating to help us continue to serve you.
Ads on/off / Custom Title / More PMs / More album space / Advanced printing & mass image saving |
![]() |
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
![]() |
#1 |
diyAudio Member
|
![]()
I am building a tubed active 12db/octave crossover.
The configuration uses the tube in a cathode follower mode. If I use an ECC type tube , which is better - an ECC82 or an ECC81 ? The load will be over 22Kohms. Are the 6SL7 and 6SN7 useful here. I am concerned about the distortion levels at about 2 volts and the output impedance. Thanks for any help. Cheers, Ashok.
__________________
AM |
![]() |
![]() |
#2 |
diyAudio Moderator Emeritus
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: Near London. UK
|
22k is a heavy load. Just because a cathode follower has low output resistance does not mean it will take kindly to such a load. A cathode follower is a special case of an ordinary common cathode amplifier, but with the load moved to the cathode to give 100% feedback. Plot a 22k loadline on these valves, and you will see that it is a heavy load.
Since the gain stage is a cathode follower, the more mu you have, the more distortion-reducing negative feedback you have. However, Sallen & Key filters use positive feedback to achieve their slope, so they increase distortion. 6SN7 is probably the best compromise because it is low distortion. ECC82 is low mu and high distortion. 6SL7 is high mu and quite low distortion, but cannot drive significant current, and that's important because the input impedance of S&K is lower than you would expect from just glancing at circuit values. ECC81 can drive current, and has reasonably high mu and gm, but is not particularly low distortion.
__________________
The loudspeaker: The only commercial Hi-Fi item where a disproportionate part of the budget isn't spent on the box. And the one where it would make a difference... |
![]() |
![]() |
#3 |
On Hiatus
|
My favorite tube for xovers is sadly no longer available. But what I would probably do is configure the innards with something like a 12AX7 or 6SL7 (you need gain to get the filter functions to follow properly), then buffer the output with something like a 6SN7 or 7119.
__________________
"You tell me whar a man gits his corn pone, en I'll tell you what his 'pinions is." |
![]() |
![]() |
#4 |
RIP
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: C'ville VA, USA
|
Might be a good place for an ECC99.
|
![]() |
![]() |
#5 |
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: .
|
Hi Ashok,
E88CC. I built the Steve Bench xo and remain quite happy with the results. |
![]() |
![]() |
#6 |
frugal-phile(tm)
diyAudio Moderator
|
I have speculated about active tube XOs, which seem to end up being pretty much filters sandwiched between cathode followers (what i'd like is a tubed subtractive XO). Since a cathode follower works a lot better with a CCS on the bottom i have wondered about the feasibility of using something like 6AN8 (this tube seems to get trashed even more then the 'AU7) or a 6X8 or somesuch with the pentode section used as the CSS?
dave Tube XO Schematics
__________________
community sites t-linespeakers.org, frugal-horn.com, frugal-phile.com ........ commercial site planet10-HiFi p10-hifi forum here at diyA |
![]() |
![]() |
#7 |
diyAudio Moderator Emeritus
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: Near London. UK
|
![]()
Oh yes. Almost any cathode follower with a CCS load is in with a chance, and some of the little triode pentodes are ideal. 6FG8 looks good. None have the linearity of a 6SN7, but they're dirt cheap. The only things that you need to watch out for is to check how low an anode voltage the pentode section will tolerate whilst still being securely on the flat part of the curves, and to check the permissible heater/cathode voltage for the triode section. The PCF types tend to have better heater/cathode insulation. If you pull the pentode's control grid up to 10 or 20V, this allows a much bigger cathode resistor, making ra' very large indeed, and the triode's loadline horizontal.
__________________
The loudspeaker: The only commercial Hi-Fi item where a disproportionate part of the budget isn't spent on the box. And the one where it would make a difference... |
![]() |
![]() |
#8 | |
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Wheaton IL.
|
Quote:
Tube Cad recomended 6DJ8, the 6SL7 seems cool, and the 12ax7 is the triode gain champ. Interesting choices. I am just starting to research building the Linkwitz Phoenix or PMTM1 & PW1. If I'm going to build crossovers, tubes seem the natural choice for most of the functions. The exception is the gyrator. I got to admit, a tube gyrator is a bit much. ![]() Anyone with experience on these type of filters? A 3 way stereo L-R 4'th order would have 14 dual triodes. And that doesn't include the baffle compensation, the all-pass phase shifter, etc. I would really like your collective insight on this. Doug |
|
![]() |
![]() |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Crossover capacitor choice | Jonasa | Multi-Way | 47 | 5th November 2009 11:15 PM |
Got my tube spice models, and tubed CD player page back on the air | wa2ise | Tubes / Valves | 2 | 20th April 2008 11:07 PM |
Is 6dB active crossover a good choice | ostie01 | Multi-Way | 17 | 3rd January 2006 04:31 PM |
I need a schematic for a tubed crossover that can cope with 10k load impedance?!? | hifi | Tubes / Valves | 7 | 16th August 2004 07:26 PM |
Choice for sub plate amp - phase/crossover? | cheesehead | Multi-Way | 2 | 11th May 2004 11:38 PM |
New To Site? | Need Help? |