• WARNING: Tube/Valve amplifiers use potentially LETHAL HIGH VOLTAGES.
    Building, troubleshooting and testing of these amplifiers should only be
    performed by someone who is thoroughly familiar with
    the safety precautions around high voltages.

Non-magnetic bolts that hold an output transformer together

Status
This old topic is closed. If you want to reopen this topic, contact a moderator using the "Report Post" button.
I'm not the expert on this, but of all the many output transformers I've seen, I've never seen one that didn't have an insulating shoulder washer on at least one end. Either that or non magnetic bolts. There must be some reason for this because I keep thinking of a shaded pole motor. You know the kind that has a copper shunt around part of the pole piece. It's effecting the core's flux somehow. Special washers cost money and I don't think it's there to protect the paint.
 
Nylon Bolts are easily found at the Big Box home centers (ie;Home Depot,Menards,Lowes,etc.) I am not sure of the amount of torque they can take. I might suggest using real Brass.

Brass bolts etc are available at the same places, make sure they are solid brass not plated steel, (I carry a small magnet in my pocket)
 
Sheesh, nylon bolts suck. Might as well just leave it open, let the varnish hold it together.

Isn't the whole point of the core to conduct magnetic flux? Duh, magnetic bolts are good...

Besides, bolts usually go through the center of the "E", where flux is weakest, right where it's diverging to the two legs. You can't even measure the difference (with an HP analyzer, not ears) between brass, steel, titanium or nylon bolts.

Tim
 
Isn't the whole point of the core to conduct magnetic flux? Duh, magnetic bolts are good..
Well yes but...

the thinner the laminates the lesser the eddy currents ...i.e. the smaller the losses.

And my theory is that a bolt that is magnetically/electrically connected to each of laminates in effect creates one big solid core.

And a solid core has very big losses which was the reason for using laminates in the first place.
 
Brass or stainless studding is traditionally used. I would avoid nylon, amide or sim. On E&I power transformers the losses due to eddy fields isn't nil and one stud end is usually insulated. Bolting the shroud flange feet to the chassis completes the single turn eddy curent short circuit.
I recently had to do this treatment on my 600VA transformer, as it was mysteriously getting hot and taking high standing current doing nothing.
One can also make washers out of odd pieces of glassfiber pcb with the copper filed off. :att'n: the fiberglass dust is an irritant for both skin and lungs. Work it wet.

richy
 

Attachments

  • ins bolt.jpg
    ins bolt.jpg
    164.7 KB · Views: 165
  • washers.jpg
    washers.jpg
    164.3 KB · Views: 147
. . .
And my theory is that a bolt that is magnetically/electrically connected to each of laminates in effect creates one big solid core.

And a solid core has very big losses which was the reason for using laminates in the first place.

You're right of course.
But lams are "oxyded" after being punched to build up an insulation layer and this is also true for the "holes".
So, unless if you insist using a too large screw, the effetc is usually negligible.
Even if you use brass, you may wrap'em with adhesive ribbon.

About magnetic short, I do beleive that lines of flux travel using the shortest possible path and the screws at the corners are not in the main path.

In some -very- large power units, it happens that lams assembly relies on screws wich are in the path of the flux.
I was told that they may even melt !

I've a question !
When first powering a new power transformer (well, below 400VA) it happens to have an somewhat hi "unloaded" current, 1.5 times what I expected.
I measure that before installing the screws.
After few ON/OFF cycles the current returns to a "normal" value.
Why ? ?

Yves.
 
Status
This old topic is closed. If you want to reopen this topic, contact a moderator using the "Report Post" button.