tube phasing for more power?
 User Name Stay logged in? Password
 Home Forums Rules Articles diyAudio Store Blogs Gallery Wiki Register Donations FAQ Calendar Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Search

 Tubes / Valves All about our sweet vacuum tubes :) Threads about Musical Instrument Amps of all kinds should be in the Instruments & Amps forum

 Please consider donating to help us continue to serve you. Ads on/off / Custom Title / More PMs / More album space / Advanced printing & mass image saving
 27th September 2009, 09:33 PM #1 yourownfree   diyAudio Member   Join Date: Apr 2008 tube phasing for more power? This might sound weird, and I certainly don't hold the key to all the answers, so my question might make you laugh or not. Is it possible or even a good idea to phase 4 tubes in such a manner that each one shares a portion of the sine wave? yeah I hear the laughing. No I don't mean 180-180 degrees as a P-P. I mean each side of the push pull contains two tubes, not in parallel,(4 tubes total for amp) but say the first tube goes from 0-45 degrees and again it goes from 90 to 135 degrees. The second tube from 45 to 90 and again from 135 to 180. Or something of that nature. The third and fourth tube do the other half of the cycle.The thought is to push more power from the tube than possible with class A, B etc. Just thinking one might get twice the power than with 2 tubes in parallel each side. so instead of four 6AQ5's doing 20 watts get 40 watts, for example. Is this just a bad idea and a waste of server space?
 27th September 2009, 09:53 PM #2 jechentau   diyAudio Member   Join Date: Feb 2005 Location: Gelderland ah ;p i see. would work best with single frequency or square wave signals (simple predictable signals) and, well, a tube is a tube, average power will be the same, work twice, rest twice so to say. it makes me think of a system where every 5 seconds another bridge carries the load. but fun topic
 27th September 2009, 10:01 PM #3 m6tt   diyAudio Member   Join Date: Aug 2007 I think there are a couple of issues. I've never heard of this being tried in audio, but it looks like class C operation. In other words, each tube conducts for less than 1/2 of 360 degrees. The issues I see are 2x crossover distortion, since the output tubes collectively will "cross zero" 4 times per 360. I am also not sure whether this requires something like two p-p transformers or four SE transformers...or how to exactly set this up bias vs. grid voltage wise. This also seems like it would be much more sensitive to the power supply, since you have a couple of big current draws happening suddenly, but they might cancel enough. It's an interesting question, but I worry that if it worked well that Bogen or some other PA amp manufacturer would have already done this since they'd have been able to effectively double the power and thus the value of their equipment when watts were at a premium. That being said, you'd think the Roman empire would've invented the airplane too .
 27th September 2009, 10:02 PM #4 yourownfree   diyAudio Member   Join Date: Apr 2008 I see.. makes you think though. I was thinking something like that. Using some form of feedback from one tube to control the grid of another or just use ic's. yeah more like class C but combining the two, to end up with a different class.I would be willing to try it Last edited by yourownfree; 27th September 2009 at 10:06 PM.
 27th September 2009, 10:19 PM #5 jechentau   diyAudio Member   Join Date: Feb 2005 Location: Gelderland well, what really sets class c apart is that the tube conducts only hard, with little voltage across it (say peak of sine). but one may need to run it at rf, and use some sort of high power demodulator to listen to it ;p or equivalently, use a resonant output circuit, for 1 single tone, or listen to square waves. or, many many ones combined to a wideband output. a sortof analog wavelet amplifier ;p Last edited by jechentau; 27th September 2009 at 10:25 PM.
 28th September 2009, 12:57 AM #6 smoking-amp   Sin Bin   Join Date: Dec 2001 Location: Hickory, NC Efficiency comes from keeping the voltage across the tube minimized. Class G or class H do that by using multiple B+ levels for multiple tubes or by tracking B+ levels for one set of tubes (tracking of the audio envelope + some margin). Commonly done for SS amplifiers, could be done for tubes too. Problem with tubes though, is that they require a lot more minimum voltage to operate than SS devices.
 28th September 2009, 01:37 AM #7 yourownfree   diyAudio Member   Join Date: Apr 2008 wow, a lot of info. I can also see that if switching was done the frequency of the switching would be a problem and be just noisy as heck probably. OK bad idea, but sure was interesting to dissect.
 28th September 2009, 04:00 AM #8 Poindexter   diyAudio Member   Join Date: Oct 2004 Location: Maui, Hawai'i, USA Ah, guyz, There's a way to divide up the power of the audio signal between tubes, without all this signal division and switching and other difficult/impossible to transparently implement elaboration. It's called parallel operation. Occam often has it right, y'know. Poinz AudioTropic
 28th September 2009, 04:50 AM #9 smoking-amp   Sin Bin   Join Date: Dec 2001 Location: Hickory, NC Well, one could just cheat: http://www.diyaudio.com/forums/showt...030#post871030 This could also be seen as class H (tracking rails) if the tube amp is implemented using pentodes, since the SS amp would effectively be feeding a tracking B+ back thru the output xfmr to the plates. Using triodes though looks more like series connected amplifiers, due to their low plate Z allowing SS bleedthru. Another way would be to use tubes for the lowest power level of a class G amplifier, and Mosfets for the higher power (and B+) level(s). A similar setup that has been used before has triodes for the 1st level and pentodes for the higher power level. Grid biasing determines when each tier parallels in.
 28th September 2009, 05:14 AM #10 Wavebourn   Designer & Technologist diyAudio Member     Join Date: Sep 2006 Location: Pleasant Hill, CA I made class A+C amps, they sounded very nice. Both SS and hybrids. However, I never did class A+C with tube outputs, but it is possible. __________________ Nothing in the universe is perfect. The ideal things are the ones that are most optimal. Optimization criteria, what matters. When I hear "No Compromise Design", I want to take a sledgehammer and test how impact-proof it is.

 Posting Rules You may not post new threads You may not post replies You may not post attachments You may not edit your posts BB code is On Smilies are On [IMG] code is On HTML code is Off Forum Rules
 Forum Jump User Control Panel Private Messages Subscriptions Who's Online Search Forums Forums Home Site     Site Announcements     Forum Problems Amplifiers     Solid State     Pass Labs     Tubes / Valves     Chip Amps     Class D     Power Supplies     Headphone Systems Source & Line     Analogue Source     Analog Line Level     Digital Source     Digital Line Level     PC Based Loudspeakers     Multi-Way     Full Range     Subwoofers     Planars & Exotics Live Sound     PA Systems     Instruments and Amps Design & Build     Parts     Equipment & Tools     Construction Tips     Software Tools General Interest     Car Audio     diyAudio.com Articles     Music     Everything Else Member Areas     Introductions     The Lounge     Clubs & Events     In Memoriam The Moving Image Commercial Sector     Swap Meet     Group Buys     The diyAudio Store     Vendor Forums         Vendor's Bazaar         Sonic Craft         Apex Jr         Audio Sector         Acoustic Fun         Chipamp         DIY HiFi Supply         Elekit         Elektor         Mains Cables R Us         Parts Connexion         Planet 10 hifi         Quanghao Audio Design         Siliconray Online Electronics Store         Tubelab     Manufacturers         AKSA         Audio Poutine         Musicaltech         Aussie Amplifiers         CSS         exaDevices         Feastrex         GedLee         Head 'n' HiFi - Walter         Heatsink USA         miniDSP         SITO Audio         Twin Audio         Twisted Pear         Wild Burro Audio

 Similar Threads Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post amplexus Instruments and Amps 5 1st July 2016 08:03 AM Skorpio Solid State 0 29th July 2008 01:35 PM audiofan Tubes / Valves 1 8th December 2005 06:56 PM bser Car Audio 1 14th December 2004 04:32 PM ZiprHead Multi-Way 1 15th December 2001 01:23 AM

 New To Site? Need Help?

All times are GMT. The time now is 11:42 AM.