|
|||||||
| Home | Forums | Rules | Articles | Store | Gallery | Blogs | Register | Donations | FAQ | Calendar | Search | Today's Posts | Mark Forums Read | Search |
| Tubes / Valves All about our sweet vacuum tubes :) Threads about Musical Instrument Amps of all kinds should be in the Instruments & Amps forum |
|
|
Please consider donating to help us continue to serve you.
Ads on/off / Custom Title / More PMs / More album space / Advanced printing & mass image saving |
![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|
#1 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: So.Cal.
|
or.....CLC vs CLCLC in PP AB1
The basic question is this: Is adding a second LC (or RC) section to a power supply to reduce ripple worth the trade of increasing PS output impedance? It seems that for AB1 operation, low PS output impedance is important due to changing current requirements, whereas class A being relatively steady state current draw would benefit from additional LC/RC sections at the expense of output impedance. Is there a "sweet spot" point of diminishing returns for this? Are less sections "better" for AB compared to class A? My question above assumes that different transformers can be specified to get whatever B+ is needed regardless of the number of LC/RC sections.. |
|
|
|
#2 |
|
diyAudio Moderator
|
Have your cake and eat it, too- use a regulator.
That said, I'd trade off somewhat increased ripple for lower supply impedance if I were on a desert island and couldn't get pass transistors. A decent push pull circuit does a pretty good job of ripple rejection, at least in the class A region, where it counts.
__________________
If there's a sucker born every minute, where do the rest of them come from? |
|
|
|
#3 | |
|
diyAudio Member
|
Quote:
But I agree with SY, a regulator does both. jd
__________________
It is a capital mistake to theorise before one has data. Insensibly one begins to twist facts to suit theories, instead of theories to suit facts - Sherlock Holmes Check out Linear Audio Vol 5! |
|
|
|
|
#4 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: San Diego, CA
|
Keep in mind that if these are pentodes you need not worry too much about plate voltage variation, ripple....Since you should be operating in the saturation region of the curves you should not see much issues....
The screen supply is another matter and this is what should be regulated and will make all the difference.... Many times to often I see chokes that are too small for the LC filter section for the screens... At idle things are OK....but at full power output the choke becomes void and the ripple on the screen is HUGE.... For example, 4 EL34 valves ate idle pulling roughly 4 mA per screen.... AT full power output this can be about 15mA to 25mA per valve and the choke is saturated or partially saturated and the L value drops off, making for some big 120Hz ripple of the screens....The screens in theory would cancel all this in P-P operation, but how many places match for screen gm in addition to input grid ![]() Chris |
|
|
|
#5 | |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: So.Cal.
|
Quote:
|
|
|
![]() |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Class D - LC output filter - C ripple current | Skeebopstop | Class D | 8 | 26th February 2009 05:08 AM |
| 3C24 in a SE output stage - output transformer impedance recommendation !!! | aldovan | Tubes / Valves | 15 | 6th September 2008 10:18 AM |
| Output impedance | overdrajv | Tubes / Valves | 8 | 5th March 2008 05:54 PM |
| Can An Output Transformer Change A Voltage Amp's Output Impedance From 0.1 To 47 Ohms | kelticwizard | Everything Else | 11 | 25th March 2007 05:17 AM |
| Help me regarding very low Supply Ripple output noise DC volume control unit | electronist | Parts | 0 | 31st December 2003 09:29 AM |
| New To Site? | Need Help? |