|
|||||||
| Home | Forums | Rules | Articles | Store | Gallery | Blogs | Register | Donations | FAQ | Calendar | Search | Today's Posts | Mark Forums Read | Search |
| Tubes / Valves All about our sweet vacuum tubes :) Threads about Musical Instrument Amps of all kinds should be in the Instruments & Amps forum |
|
Please consider donating to help us continue to serve you.
Ads on/off / Custom Title / More PMs / More album space / Advanced printing & mass image saving |
|
![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|
#201 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Sep 2003
|
mach1,
Thank you for a very informative reply! The subject of glow tubes comes up from time to time on this forum, and frankly very few seem to know how they work.
__________________
Thanx! |
|
|
|
#202 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Brisvegas
|
Correction: The use of the term transconductance was totally inappropriate in my previous posting (serious caffeine deficiency). It should be replaced by the term shunt efficiency, where shunt efficiency = dI/dV , or change in current / change in voltage
__________________
Au rutti wop-bop-a-loom-bop-a-boom-bam-boom - Richard Penniman |
|
|
|
#203 |
|
diyAudio Chief Moderator
|
Disco's gonna test a 1.5 Vout Mosfet CCS & BJT shunt reg set at 1.2A for #26. 1A available to the heater, 200mA to burn all time at the shunt transistor. I arranged it so it can utilize a 6V3 secondary tap for rectification, so it can work from 6.3-9V DC input. It has a trimmer too. It shows like working on the simulator, I just hope its gonna work properly in real life too, the output voltage you need here for heating up the 26 its just too low and it was a challenge to set it right and find the right transistor even in simulation. If we get good working order and good tone results will let you know. Don't know when he will do it.
|
|
|
|
#204 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Jul 2006
|
Thanks Salas! Please update us when Disco has it done
|
|
|
|
#205 | ||
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Melbourne
|
Hi Sheldon & Rod,
Quote:
Quote:
I’m still waiting for parts to build Rod’s filament psu, so went ahead and built a psu with 7805 regulator and 1086 ccs, sort of like Kevin’s suggestion on his website.
__________________
"A little learning is a dangerous thing" |
||
|
|
|
#206 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Melbourne
|
I now have a 3 chassis 26 preamp.
This weekend I finally managed to finish the pre and test it out. One can note the Hammond chokes on the pre under construction (Fig 2). I ended up putting the chokes in an Alu box to shield them, also put some Arcturus tubes in a finished version to make it look sexy (Fig 3). Voltages were all good, no smoke but I do have this bloody low frequency hum and some hissing noise. I officially feel like I’m part of the 26 problems club. A view of the wiring is also attached (Fig 4). The B+ psu chassis and filament psu chassis are about a meter away from the actual preamp I plan on trying the following: 1) Shielding and grounding the umbilical cables a) joining mains 240V from main psu chassis to filament psu and b) from main B+ psu chassis to preamp chassis (Rod's suggestions) 2) shielding the filament wiring in the preamp chassis and grounding it 3) increasing the cathode bypass cap 4) ground the alu box with chokes 5) shield the tubes and ground that (Kevin's suggestions) Any other suggestions would be most welcome. Cheers, Rich
__________________
"A little learning is a dangerous thing" Last edited by Richard; 29th November 2009 at 01:37 AM. |
|
|
|
#207 | |
|
diyAudio Moderator
Join Date: May 2008
Location: Toronto
|
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
#208 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Melbourne
|
A schematic of the preamp and filament supply is attached below. For those interested there is a description of the power supply in post 90.
Rich out
__________________
"A little learning is a dangerous thing" |
|
|
|
#209 |
|
diyAudio Chief Moderator
|
|
|
|
|
#210 |
|
diyAudio Moderator
|
My one recommendation (unsolicited I'll admit) would be to change out that 7805 for a 7806 (Rohm amongst others) because the LT1086/5/4 etc perform significantly better with >3V across the device itself. These are low drop-out devices but that does not mean their performance does not degrade in subtle ways as you approach the drop out voltage, here the headroom is only 2.3V which is not necessarily enough to assure that all internal circuitry is functioning close to specification. Increasing the voltage across the LT1086 to 3.3V or so puts the device close to the point of diminishing returns as a CCS and is probably good enough - hence the recommendation for a 7806. (Alternately you could stick two 1N4148 in series with the 7805 gnd pin making it in effect a 6.2V regulator which perhaps would be slightly better from a theoretical standpoint. )
__________________
"Extraordinary claims require extraordinary evidence." - Carl Sagan |
|
![]() |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|
| New To Site? | Need Help? |