Go Back   Home > Forums > Amplifiers > Tubes / Valves
Home Forums Rules Articles Store Gallery Blogs Register Donations FAQ Calendar Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read

Tubes / Valves All about our sweet vacuum tubes :) Threads about Musical Instrument Amps of all kinds should be in the Instruments & Amps forum

Please consider donating to help us continue to serve you.

Ads on/off / Custom Title / More PMs / More album space / Advanced printing & mass image saving
Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 22nd March 2012, 04:47 PM   #1791
diyAudio Member
 
Vinylsavor's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: Lindau
Hi Andy & All,

if my initial tests for this new transformer are good, I will get a few with various different airgaps. Anybody interested to try these can borrow a pair. All you risk is the shipping cost

Thomas
__________________
http://vinylsavor.blogspot.com/
  Reply With Quote
Old 26th March 2012, 03:47 AM   #1792
Magz is offline Magz  United States
diyAudio Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: New Jersey, USA
OK, the "preamp on a board" is complete (see pics). I'm using 9V battery grid bias, cascoded CCS plate loading at 6mA, gas regulator tubes for each channel fed by a cascoded CCS set to 22.5mA (0D3 +0A3 in series), LL1676 output transformers set to a 4:1 stepdown in parafeed, Rod Coleman filament regulators, and Duelund Alexander caps at input and for parafeed output. All signal path wiring is teflon jacketed 23 gauge solid core silver (DH Labs).

The power supply is from my 2C22 preamp and is a CLCLC with all film caps and Lundahl LL1638 chokes. It has two separate heater windings on the power transformer so each is set to feed one Coleman regulator with 6.8VDC. Since one winding feeds AC to the 2C22 preamp regulators I built a small rectifier/filter/regulator board on the back of the preamp to covert this to DC for the 26 preamp. Not exactly the ideal of separate transformers for HT and each filament, but it measures OK for noise.

The purpose of this experiment is to compare the 2C22 to the 26 using the same power supply, then decide if it's worth pursuing the 26 further. I have to say I'm very happy with the 2C22, but very curious about the 26 based on what I've read here. I've accumulated 15 or so 26 tubes over the last year, including balloon and ST types of various makes.

More to follow including measurements and listening tests.

P.S.: You can see the 2kHz square wave response in the background of picture #1 - looks pretty good.


.
Attached Images
File Type: jpg 26 preamp breadboard.jpg (36.8 KB, 382 views)
File Type: jpg 26 preamp breadboard side view.jpg (42.1 KB, 379 views)

Last edited by Magz; 26th March 2012 at 04:08 AM.
  Reply With Quote
Old 26th March 2012, 05:50 AM   #1793
diyAudio Member
 
albertli's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Vancouver
Quote:
Originally Posted by Magz View Post
OK, the "preamp on a board" is complete (see pics). I'm using 9V battery grid bias, cascoded CCS plate loading at 6mA, gas regulator tubes for each channel fed by a cascoded CCS set to 22.5mA (0D3 +0A3 in series), LL1676 output transformers set to a 4:1 stepdown in parafeed, Rod Coleman filament regulators, and Duelund Alexander caps at input and for parafeed output. All signal path wiring is teflon jacketed 23 gauge solid core silver (DH Labs).

The power supply is from my 2C22 preamp and is a CLCLC with all film caps and Lundahl LL1638 chokes. It has two separate heater windings on the power transformer so each is set to feed one Coleman regulator with 6.8VDC. Since one winding feeds AC to the 2C22 preamp regulators I built a small rectifier/filter/regulator board on the back of the preamp to covert this to DC for the 26 preamp. Not exactly the ideal of separate transformers for HT and each filament, but it measures OK for noise.

The purpose of this experiment is to compare the 2C22 to the 26 using the same power supply, then decide if it's worth pursuing the 26 further. I have to say I'm very happy with the 2C22, but very curious about the 26 based on what I've read here. I've accumulated 15 or so 26 tubes over the last year, including balloon and ST types of various makes.

More to follow including measurements and listening tests.

P.S.: You can see the 2kHz square wave response in the background of picture #1 - looks pretty good.


.
Is your cascoded CCS with DN2540/ or IXY...
A full schematic will be nice.
  Reply With Quote
Old 26th March 2012, 01:13 PM   #1794
Magz is offline Magz  United States
diyAudio Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: New Jersey, USA
Albert, the CCS uses both IXTP08N100D2 and IXTP01N100D mosfets. I'm using the compact cascode CCS (on 26 plates) and the Large Cascode CCS (for VR tubes input) from K&K audio for this project. I've also wired up CCS's using the IXYS 10M45S parts in the past, but these K&K units are inexpensive and a bit neater looking, and come complete with heat sinks.

I'll have a schematic available once I get a few minutes to draw one - it's all in my head now...

One thing is clear - you need 200H primary inductance to get flat response down to 20Hz; my two LL1676s measure at 200H and 176H (at 100Hz). The 200H one has a -3dB of ~18Hz whereas the 176H one has a -3db of ~29Hz.

By the way, in listening tests versus the 2C22 preamp it's a pretty close comparison. So far I think the balloon 26s sound better than the ST, but I haven't run through all the versions I have yet. The balloons seem to have a more fluid, smoother sound. The Cunningham CX-326s DO seem to pick up more interference from things like overhead lighting than the ST Sylvanias, though.

I have zero problems with microphonics; I can tap on the plywood base and hear nothing through the speakers, and the Khozmo stepped attenuator does not cause issues as it clicks through the steps, so the isolation scheme seems to be working just fine.
  Reply With Quote
Old 26th March 2012, 04:04 PM   #1795
Magz is offline Magz  United States
diyAudio Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: New Jersey, USA
Here is a frequency response plot of both channels of my 26 preamp. You can clearly see the difference in low-end response between the 200H and 176H transformers. Overall the plot is nice and flat out past the measurement capabilities of my laptop soundcard, which verifies the good results I saw on the 2kHz square wave response with my scope.
Attached Images
File Type: jpg 26 preamp breadboard FR.jpg (404.1 KB, 330 views)
  Reply With Quote
Old 26th March 2012, 04:25 PM   #1796
vgeorge is offline vgeorge  Greece
diyAudio Member
 
vgeorge's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: poros island
Hi Magz,

did you do any 10khz square wave on your scope?
Also you could do a sine wave sweep up to 100khz to see if your transformers have any ringing. My ll1660pp had some ringing around 50khz, if I remember correctly.
Putting a 4,7k 100n zobel at the output made things nicer on the scope and sounded a bit better too.
__________________
"Without deviations from the norm, progress is not possible" - Frank Zappa
  Reply With Quote
Old 26th March 2012, 04:32 PM   #1797
diyAudio Member
 
albertli's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Vancouver
.

I have zero problems with microphonics; I can tap on the plywood base and hear nothing through the speakers, and the Khozmo stepped attenuator does not cause issues as it clicks through the steps, so the isolation scheme seems to be working just fine.[/QUOTE]

Lucky I don't have this problem either. Long to see your CCS schematic.
  Reply With Quote
Old 26th March 2012, 04:33 PM   #1798
diyAudio Member
 
albertli's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Vancouver
Putting a 4,7k 100n zobel at the output made things nicer on the scope and sounded a bit better too.[/QUOTE]

I second the above tweak.
  Reply With Quote
Old 26th March 2012, 04:44 PM   #1799
Magz is offline Magz  United States
diyAudio Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: New Jersey, USA
Quote:
Originally Posted by vgeorge View Post
Hi Magz,

did you do any 10khz square wave on your scope?
Also you could do a sine wave sweep up to 100khz to see if your transformers have any ringing. My ll1660pp had some ringing around 50khz, if I remember correctly.
Putting a 4,7k 100n zobel at the output made things nicer on the scope and sounded a bit better too.
There is a little bit of ringing at the leading edge of the 2kHz square wave, but it's well-damped. 10kHz also has some. 20kHz starts to look a bit ugly at the front, but with the secondaries in parallel I expected that. Sounds smooth, though.

In my 2C22 preamp I use the LL1674 which is very similar, and I saw worse ringing on the 2kHz square wave. I added a 2nF, 520 ohm RC to the secondary and it killed that right off.

I may go back and put something on the secondaries of the LL1676, just haven't had the time to do all the tweaking yet...darn job...
  Reply With Quote
Old 26th March 2012, 04:46 PM   #1800
vgeorge is offline vgeorge  Greece
diyAudio Member
 
vgeorge's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: poros island
These values could be tweaked a bit more. I have only done preliminary testing. Also noticed that dhtrob had an 750r at the output with different transformers though.
__________________
"Without deviations from the norm, progress is not possible" - Frank Zappa
  Reply With Quote

Reply


Hide this!Advertise here!
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off



New To Site? Need Help?

All times are GMT. The time now is 10:00 AM.

Page generated in 0.10812 seconds (100.00% PHP - 0% MySQL) with 9 queries

Copyright ©1999-2013 diyAudio