|
|||||||
| Home | Forums | Rules | Articles | Store | Gallery | Blogs | Register | Donations | FAQ | Calendar | Search | Today's Posts | Mark Forums Read | Search |
| Tubes / Valves All about our sweet vacuum tubes :) Threads about Musical Instrument Amps of all kinds should be in the Instruments & Amps forum |
|
|
Please consider donating to help us continue to serve you.
Ads on/off / Custom Title / More PMs / More album space / Advanced printing & mass image saving |
![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|
#1 |
|
DIY !
diyAudio Member
|
I found this (chinese) 300B PP amp, using 6SL7 as first tube (and 6SN7 as driver).
But doing a drawing of the internals, I find the 6SL7 connected as one triode (both in paralell). The 6SL7 has a touch much gain, so a 6SN7 does the job almost just as good... Now, I was thinking, is there a single-triode (octal) 6SL7, or something between SL and SN, or would maybe a 6J5 be a simpler sollution? Arne K
__________________
Ars longa, vita brevis |
|
|
|
#2 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Ardeche
|
Take a look at 6EA7/6EM7.
OK, the large triode is a bit too beefy but it could easyly replace the half 6SN7 while the small section really loos like an half 6SL7. Yves. |
|
|
|
#3 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Nov 2005
|
6SF5 and 7B4 are both pretty close to a single section of a 6SL7 or 12AX7.
|
|
|
|
#4 |
|
DIY !
diyAudio Member
|
Loctal would fit (w/adapter)...octal preferred, so the existing socket could stay.
I do not think this first tube needs any "drive", but will disconnecting one half do any unexpected changes? (in front of the 6SN7, that is the splitter/driver). Arne K
__________________
Ars longa, vita brevis |
|
|
|
#5 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Nov 2005
|
The 6SF5 is octal. You can also just use half of the 6SL7.
|
|
|
|
#6 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Norway
|
6SQ7 (~1/2 6SL7 + 2 diodes).
jan.
__________________
Life is hard - Then you die. |
|
|
|
#7 |
|
DIY !
diyAudio Member
|
This would be the simplest "upgrade", I think. But, since it has a tad too much gain, would a 6J5 (and maybe a reduction in feedback) do the job better?
Arne K 6SQ7 is interesting, but not in my collection (yet)...
__________________
Ars longa, vita brevis Last edited by Cobra2; 8th September 2009 at 08:52 PM. |
|
|
|
#8 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Nov 2005
|
If the 6SL7 is in parallel, using one section only won't change the gain. Both sections in parallel are likely important to allow sufficient drive for the 6SN7 stage. A 6SN7/6J5, however, would reduce gain significantly.
|
|
|
|
#9 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Auckland, NZ
|
octal smooth and cheap as chips
__________________
"Folks, you can't prove truthiness with information. You prove truthiness with more truthiness. In a process known as truthinessiness." - Stephen Colbert, The Colbert Report |
|
|
|
#10 |
|
DIY !
diyAudio Member
|
My napkin drawings..:
Arne K Coments, please
__________________
Ars longa, vita brevis |
|
![]() |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| 6X5, 2x 6SL7 & a 6v6GT.... | jmsjabb | Tubes / Valves | 0 | 11th January 2009 06:13 PM |
| 6SL7 5E3 - together at last? | atmars | Tubes / Valves | 12 | 24th November 2008 01:59 AM |
| 6sl7 | nhuwar | Tubes / Valves | 6 | 23rd August 2008 03:29 PM |
| 6sl7 | omom123 | Tubes / Valves | 0 | 23rd August 2007 07:11 PM |
| New To Site? | Need Help? |