|
|
|||||||
| Home | Forums | Rules | Articles | Store | Gallery | Blogs | Register | Donations | FAQ | Calendar | Search | Today's Posts | Mark Forums Read | Search |
| Tubes / Valves All about our sweet vacuum tubes :) Threads about Musical Instrument Amps of all kinds should be in the Instruments & Amps forum |
| diyAudio Sponsor | ||
|
|
||
|
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|
#1 |
|
DIY !
diyAudio Member
|
I found this (chinese) 300B PP amp, using 6SL7 as first tube (and 6SN7 as driver).
But doing a drawing of the internals, I find the 6SL7 connected as one triode (both in paralell). The 6SL7 has a touch much gain, so a 6SN7 does the job almost just as good... Now, I was thinking, is there a single-triode (octal) 6SL7, or something between SL and SN, or would maybe a 6J5 be a simpler sollution? Arne K
__________________
Ars longa, vita brevis |
|
|
|
|
#2 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Ardeche
|
Take a look at 6EA7/6EM7.
OK, the large triode is a bit too beefy but it could easyly replace the half 6SN7 while the small section really loos like an half 6SL7. Yves. |
|
|
|
|
#3 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Nov 2005
|
6SF5 and 7B4 are both pretty close to a single section of a 6SL7 or 12AX7.
|
|
|
|
|
#4 |
|
DIY !
diyAudio Member
|
Loctal would fit (w/adapter)...octal preferred, so the existing socket could stay.
I do not think this first tube needs any "drive", but will disconnecting one half do any unexpected changes? (in front of the 6SN7, that is the splitter/driver). Arne K
__________________
Ars longa, vita brevis |
|
|
|
|
#5 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Nov 2005
|
The 6SF5 is octal. You can also just use half of the 6SL7.
|
|
|
|
|
#6 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Norway
|
6SQ7 (~1/2 6SL7 + 2 diodes).
jan.
__________________
Life is hard - Then you die. |
|
|
|
|
#7 |
|
DIY !
diyAudio Member
|
This would be the simplest "upgrade", I think. But, since it has a tad too much gain, would a 6J5 (and maybe a reduction in feedback) do the job better?
Arne K 6SQ7 is interesting, but not in my collection (yet)...
__________________
Ars longa, vita brevis Last edited by Cobra2; 8th September 2009 at 08:52 PM. |
|
|
|
|
#8 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Nov 2005
|
If the 6SL7 is in parallel, using one section only won't change the gain. Both sections in parallel are likely important to allow sufficient drive for the 6SN7 stage. A 6SN7/6J5, however, would reduce gain significantly.
|
|
|
|
|
#9 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Auckland, NZ
|
octal smooth and cheap as chips
__________________
Yes, conservatism thrives on low intelligence and poor information. But the liberals in politics... continue to back off, yielding to the supremacy of the stupid. It's turkeys all the way down. - George Monbiot, guardian.co.uk, 6 Feb 2012 |
|
|
|
|
#10 |
|
DIY !
diyAudio Member
|
My napkin drawings..:
Arne K Coments, please
__________________
Ars longa, vita brevis |
|
|
| Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|
|
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| 6X5, 2x 6SL7 & a 6v6GT.... | jmsjabb | Tubes / Valves | 0 | 11th January 2009 06:13 PM |
| 6SL7 5E3 - together at last? | atmars | Tubes / Valves | 12 | 24th November 2008 01:59 AM |
| 6sl7 | nhuwar | Tubes / Valves | 6 | 23rd August 2008 03:29 PM |
| 6sl7 | omom123 | Tubes / Valves | 0 | 23rd August 2007 07:11 PM |
| New To Site? | Need Help? |
| Page generated in 0.13693 seconds (70.98% PHP - 29.02% MySQL) with 11 queries |