|
|
|||||||
| Home | Forums | Rules | Articles | Store | Gallery | Blogs | Register | Donations | FAQ | Calendar | Search | Today's Posts | Mark Forums Read | Search |
| Tubes / Valves All about our sweet vacuum tubes :) Threads about Musical Instrument Amps of all kinds should be in the Instruments & Amps forum |
| diyAudio Sponsor | ||
|
|
||
|
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|
#1 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Nov 2007
|
For a special purpose project (I've said too much already), I'm sorely tempted to utilize traditional PCB edge connectors for some sub-assemblies, including all wires running to my preamp tubes.
Any thoughts on the problems I'll see with this approach? I'll watch the distance between bare traces to avoid arcing, of course. |
|
|
|
|
#2 | |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Jan 2008
|
Quote:
Think about accidents where a card is half-way inserted and at an angle. The printed pins can short two contacts. The pin and socket design can't do that If you want to stay with plugable moduals and at the same time retain an "old time" look. Use tube sockets and plugs as your interconnects. These are actually rated for high voltage. Today's do not say "500V" anyplace on the package. I've been wanting to design a "21st Century" tube amp for a long time. It would be controlled by a microconroller. The uP could automatically sequence the power up and then check voltages and bias levels. Computers are now so cheap the whole uP system would cost less then one good power tube. To be tuely "21st Century" I'd need something better than turrent boards but just as easy to modify. Little 3" square PCBs might be good |
|
|
|
|
|
#3 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: Carlisle, England
|
The main problem could be crosstalk.
__________________
http://www.murtonpikesystems.co.uk PCBCAD40 pcb design software. |
|
|
|
|
#4 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Canandaigua, NY USA
|
I don't suscribe to big changes in sound resulting from wire, connectors etc, unless they've begun to oxidize. That said, if you're going with traditional PCB fingers, I'd only consider gold plated fingers against gold plated high quality connectors. As suggested above, there are better solutions. I'd check the Samtec catalog for their various edge connection and stacking solutions.
__________________
I used to be an audiophool like you but then I took an arrow to the knee. |
|
|
|
|
#6 | |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Sep 2004
|
If the connection is clean and solid, no, nothing is likely to go wrong.
Quote:
![]() Cheers! |
|
|
|
|
|
#7 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Aug 2008
|
Provided that the usual considerations for current through the pins, sufficient dielectric strength between and decent gold plating, I suggest that any effect on sound would be no worse than any other arrangement.
I'm a fan of DIN41612 style connectors, these are used extensively in the telecomms industry and by test equipment manufacturers; they are available in many configurations. |
|
|
|
|
#8 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Nov 2007
|
Thanks, all. Samtec looks to have some possibilities that would work.
|
|
|
| Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|
|
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| edge question | pforeman | Full Range | 3 | 10th July 2010 02:02 PM |
| Diffract.exe is no more, try the edge! | Svante | Multi-Way | 69 | 11th May 2005 05:04 AM |
| Help with edge.exe | Dave Jones | Multi-Way | 2 | 21st May 2004 11:38 PM |
| Edge connectors - which to use? | andyjevans | Tubes / Valves | 4 | 8th January 2004 09:38 AM |
| Philips Seismic Edge Sound Problem | Smoke Eater | Digital Source | 0 | 9th October 2003 02:19 PM |
| New To Site? | Need Help? |
| Page generated in 0.09453 seconds (75.46% PHP - 24.54% MySQL) with 10 queries |