|
|
|||||||
| Home | Forums | Rules | Articles | Store | Gallery | Blogs | Register | Donations | FAQ | Calendar | Search | Today's Posts | Mark Forums Read | Search |
| Tubes / Valves All about our sweet vacuum tubes :) Threads about Musical Instrument Amps of all kinds should be in the Instruments & Amps forum |
| diyAudio Sponsor | ||
|
|
||
|
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|
#1 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Jul 2008
|
Hi all,
Just threw together a new linestage. Got loads of tubes and experimenting with all types of designs. Sounds very nice indeed. No hum, no noise, very detailed, good punch. Even thought I'm using a very simple SS power supply, simple CRCRC. Please have a look at the voltages, values and see what you think. B+ is a little high a think. Current on lower tube is 5.8mA I believe. Could do with raising this somewhat I guess. Now I'm not too familiar with this design. Your guidance would be appreciated on currents. |
|
|
|
|
#2 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Jul 2008
|
Slight mod to design:
|
|
|
|
|
#3 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Oct 2006
|
I'd say the voltages look pretty good. Anywhere from 90V to 150V seems to be a popular range for this tube. I run them at 105V in my D/A and 150V in my amp.
I would agree that you might find marked improvement by increasing the current, but this is of course application and topology dependent. By the curves, it shouldn't matter, but subjectively this tube seems to enjoy running at higher currents and lower grid voltages. As a linestage, you might be able to run successfully at a 3 or 4V grid instead of 7. There is typically low grid current up to +0.5V. Worth a try; just change a few resistors and make sure the PS can handle it. |
|
|
|
|
#4 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Jul 2008
|
Cool!
Made some improvements and changes to values. Very pleased with the sound indeed. |
|
|
|
|
#5 |
|
diyAudio Moderator
|
Why the SRPP? A line stage only needs to swing a few volts and the loads aren't horribly reactive. A plain vanilla common-cathode stage with a CF would have lower distortion and less stress on heater-to-cathode.
__________________
“Listening to records is like ****ing a picture of Brigitte Bardot.” - Sergiu Celibidache |
|
|
|
|
#6 | ||
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Jul 2008
|
Quote:
Thks for your advice. I'll try out your suggestions for the next one. Quote:
Would this be a good idea? |
||
|
|
|
|
#7 |
|
diyAudio Moderator
|
I haven't used those, but I've had excellent results with triode-strapped EF86, 5879, and D3a.
__________________
“Listening to records is like ****ing a picture of Brigitte Bardot.” - Sergiu Celibidache |
|
|
|
|
#8 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Jul 2008
|
This is a very crude design.
Just to check how to strap a pentode. Would this be the correct form? G2 strapped to anode (with resistor) G3 strapped to cathode. Is a cap between the anode of the first triode and G1 of the pentode necessary? |
|
|
|
|
#9 |
|
diyAudio Moderator
|
For small signal pentodes, I generally tie g2 directly to plate. Usually g3 to cathode, but that could go either way- take a look at the D3a datasheet which shows characteristics with g3 to plate vs g3 to cathode.
__________________
“Listening to records is like ****ing a picture of Brigitte Bardot.” - Sergiu Celibidache |
|
|
| Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|
|
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| 6N6P vs. 6N6P-I | sparkle | Tubes / Valves | 46 | 6th May 2010 10:56 AM |
| 6N6P vs 5687 | mus | Tubes / Valves | 32 | 24th January 2009 07:19 PM |
| 6n6p amp | timothyldodd | Tubes / Valves | 2 | 2nd October 2007 12:48 AM |
| Help with 6N6p | dsavitsk | Tubes / Valves | 10 | 29th March 2007 09:34 PM |
| Pin 9 on 6n6P, 6H30, etc | dsavitsk | Tubes / Valves | 3 | 27th August 2006 06:37 AM |
| New To Site? | Need Help? |
| Page generated in 0.09164 seconds (76.58% PHP - 23.42% MySQL) with 11 queries |