IV single stage inverting Feedback Amp
 User Name Stay logged in? Password
 Home Forums Rules Articles diyAudio Store Blogs Gallery Wiki Register Donations FAQ Calendar Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Search

 Tubes / Valves All about our sweet vacuum tubes :) Threads about Musical Instrument Amps of all kinds should be in the Instruments & Amps forum

 Please consider donating to help us continue to serve you. Ads on/off / Custom Title / More PMs / More album space / Advanced printing & mass image saving
 3rd July 2009, 06:06 AM #1 ccschua   diyAudio Member   Join Date: May 2008 IV single stage inverting Feedback Amp Attached below is the IV output stage for the TDA1543. What I found lacking is clarity at high freq and PRAT. The input voltage to the IV stage is 1.564V Peak to Peak. I wonder if the calculation for closed loop gain is correct as below (assumed ideal amp, the error will be less than 5% right?) The output is approx Acl = -Rf / Ra where Ra is the internal output resistance of tube amplification. Ra = ra || R3 For 12AX7, ra = 62.5k Ra = 62.5k||100k = 38.5k Acl = -Rf/Ra = -47k/38.5k = -1.22 Therefore the output voltage is 1.564 * 1.22 = 1.9V peak to peak. 1. I have checked and verify the circuit again and I wonder why isnt the Grid resistor R5 be placed at point A? 2. If i remove the cathode cap, will I improve the dynamic response at the expense of loop gain and how much loop gain is sacrificed? 3. Is the Rload = R3 = 100k too low ?
 3rd July 2009, 04:29 PM #2 ccschua   diyAudio Member   Join Date: May 2008 Or perhaps there should be a New Grid resistor of 470K connected to point A? Aiken has mentioned removing Ck improves transient reponse, yes / no ?
 3rd July 2009, 07:12 PM #3 dsavitsk   diyAudio Member     Join Date: Jan 2005 Location: Hartford That's an awful lot of work for .336 extra volts, particularly when you can simply increase the supply voltage to the tda1543's slightly and increase the I/V resistors slightly to get the same, or more, voltage. I don't think Ck is your problem. __________________ http://www.ecpaudio.com :: http://diy.ecpaudio.com
 3rd July 2009, 09:37 PM #4 DougL   diyAudio Member   Join Date: Feb 2004 Location: Wheaton IL. I ran the circuit through the Tube cad simulator. Open loop gain is about 4. Vbias = -.63 Voutmax -1/+5.85 V Ra = 6 V This circuit is not capable of 2 V rms output. This looks like it was designed to add color, not provide low distortion output. If you designed this, lets talk about design goals. __________________ Scienta sine ars nihil est - Science without Art is nothing. (Implies the converse as well) Mater tua criceta fuit, et pater tuo redoluit bacarum sambucus
 3rd July 2009, 10:38 PM #5 kevinkr   diyAudio Moderator     Join Date: Sep 2004 Location: Boston, Massachusetts Try replacing R2 (R2 is also part of the load on the 12AX7A!!) with a 1mA CCS, change R4 to 100K and R9 to 20K and your loop gain will be high enough to actually close the loop and loading on the 12AX7A will be much less severe. A 12AX7A has an rp typically of 68K or higher depending on operating point and for good linearity and gain the load resistance (plate load resistor and external ac coupled load) should be several times higher than rp as a minimum. This circuit lacks the ability to drive low impedance loads even with the changes recommended. The other comment I would make is why do you have resistors in series with the dac outputs, I don't believe they need to be or should be there, their currents should just sum. I will post one of my old designs later that actually worked pretty well, is very simple and requires no feedback to work - also provides a very low input impedance minimizing the effect of non zero voltage on dac linearity. __________________ "To argue with a person who has renounced the use of reason is like administering medicine to the dead." - Thomas Paine
kevinkr
diyAudio Moderator

Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Boston, Massachusetts
Here is the promised circuit. I used this in the early 1990s in my Sony CDP-790 with great results, the unit lives on with a friend and continues to work well.

R6 sets the I/V conversion ratio, with the value shown 4mApp results in almost 2Vrms at the output and that low input resistance makes it look a lot more like a transimpedance amplifier than your 680 ohm resistor and results in near ideal behavior with current output dacs. Connect your dac(s) to R6. (Loose those 100 ohm resistors.)

Effectively DC offset at the input of the parallel 12AX7A is negligible in comparison to the available cathode bias because of the 10 ohm I/V resistor (it's just the baseline offset of a couple of mV or so) so no coupling capacitor is required.

Linearity was very good, and it was extremely quiet too because of the increased transconductance of the two triodes in parallel and the fact that the noise generated by each triode is gaussian in nature so summing them results in 3dB less noise than produced by a single triode.

The CF output allows it to drive >50K loads without problems.

Performance is limited mainly by parts quality. Three 12AX7A are required for stereo. You can use a 5751 for the input pair of each channel if desired, but I recommend a 12AX7A for the CF due to filament insulation concerns, and the filaments should float about +60V above ground for best performance. Power supply should be very quiet, and for best results regulated.
Attached Images
 screenshot-ltspice iv - [original_cdiv.asc].png (64.4 KB, 368 views)
__________________
"To argue with a person who has renounced the use of reason is like administering medicine to the dead." - Thomas Paine

 4th July 2009, 12:49 AM #7 ccschua   diyAudio Member   Join Date: May 2008 this circuit actually comes from the commercial cdp with the tweaks that is shown, after using exotic caps and using 4xtda1543, the company considers this as 'Reference' series. This is non other than the Oxxxx cdp, costs more than USD 1500. I believe the tube output is there to add color. Can you post the output waveform of the tubecad simulation. I have been learning tube cad but to no avail.
 4th July 2009, 04:49 AM #8 DougL   diyAudio Member   Join Date: Feb 2004 Location: Wheaton IL. I will post as much of the simulation as I can. Doug __________________ Scienta sine ars nihil est - Science without Art is nothing. (Implies the converse as well) Mater tua criceta fuit, et pater tuo redoluit bacarum sambucus
ccschua
diyAudio Member

Join Date: May 2008
Quote:
 Originally posted by dsavitsk That's an awful lot of work for .336 extra volts, particularly when you can simply increase the supply voltage to the tda1543's slightly and increase the I/V resistors slightly to get the same, or more, voltage. I don't think Ck is your problem.

The TDA 1543 unit is supplied by Vcc = 8V. I tried direct connection from IV resistor to the output cap and all I can say the tube flavor is there than without.

What I try to establish is where is the f 3db for high pass. By putting a local NFB R4/C3, the gain bandwidth product (GWP) has extend into inaudible region which would need a highpass. This is usually done with a highpass capacitor. I dont seem to see this highpass capacitor.

 4th July 2009, 01:30 PM #10 ccschua   diyAudio Member   Join Date: May 2008 Oh No. I made a big big mistake. 1. Further examination at the underside of PCB reveals that the cathode resistor is unbypassed (meaning no cathode capacitor, that means no issue with dynamic response?) 2. Rl = output load resistor = R3 = 220K (for lower frequency response) Please comment if the following make sense. Rewriting the gain equation. A (Open load) = mu Ral / (rp + Ral + Rk (mu + 1)) where mu = amplification factor = 100 for 12AX7 Ral = parallel resistance of Ra (=4.7k) and Rl (= 220k) = 4.6k Rk = cathode resistor A = 100 x 4.6 / (62.5 + 4.6 + (100+1)x0.47) => 4 From Aiken, Acl = A*Rf / (Ri + Rf - Ri*A) where Rf = Feedback resistor, R4 = 47k Ri = input resistor, R9 = 10k Acl = 4 * 47/(10+47 - (-4)10) => 1.938 therefore the voltage swing (peak to peak)is = 1.938 * 1.564 * 2 = 6V V rms = 2.14V 1. Given the zero cathode grid bias is 2.15V, I wonder if the output voltage is distorted again ? 2. The output voltage depends on A, Rf, Ri 3. Since cathode bypass cap is not there, the advantage is lower distortion at the expense of lower gain, right no. The distortion in this context is phase distortion reduction ?

 Posting Rules You may not post new threads You may not post replies You may not post attachments You may not edit your posts BB code is On Smilies are On [IMG] code is On HTML code is Off Forum Rules
 Forum Jump User Control Panel Private Messages Subscriptions Who's Online Search Forums Forums Home Site     Site Announcements     Forum Problems Amplifiers     Solid State     Pass Labs     Tubes / Valves     Chip Amps     Class D     Power Supplies     Headphone Systems Source & Line     Analogue Source     Analog Line Level     Digital Source     Digital Line Level     PC Based Loudspeakers     Multi-Way     Full Range     Subwoofers     Planars & Exotics Live Sound     PA Systems     Instruments and Amps Design & Build     Parts     Equipment & Tools     Construction Tips     Software Tools General Interest     Car Audio     diyAudio.com Articles     Music     Everything Else Member Areas     Introductions     The Lounge     Clubs & Events     In Memoriam The Moving Image Commercial Sector     Swap Meet     Group Buys     The diyAudio Store     Vendor Forums         Vendor's Bazaar         Sonic Craft         Apex Jr         Audio Sector         Acoustic Fun         Chipamp         DIY HiFi Supply         Elekit         Elektor         Mains Cables R Us         Parts Connexion         Planet 10 hifi         Quanghao Audio Design         Siliconray Online Electronics Store         Tubelab     Manufacturers         AKSA         Audio Poutine         Musicaltech         Holton Precision Audio         CSS         Dx Classic Amplifiers         exaDevices         Feastrex         GedLee         Head 'n' HiFi - Walter         Heatsink USA         miniDSP         SITO Audio         Twin Audio         Twisted Pear         Wild Burro Audio

 Similar Threads Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post tla-Audio Chip Amps 35 1st April 2009 07:16 AM luigi_secchi00 Digital Source 3 12th March 2007 03:09 PM fab Solid State 112 28th January 2007 04:32 AM azira Tubes / Valves 7 14th December 2004 03:56 PM Rino odorico Pass Labs 13 29th August 2002 09:01 AM

 New To Site? Need Help?

All times are GMT. The time now is 01:59 PM.