|
|
|||||||
| Home | Forums | Rules | Articles | Store | Gallery | Blogs | Register | Donations | FAQ | Calendar | Search | Today's Posts | Mark Forums Read | Search |
| Tubes / Valves All about our sweet vacuum tubes :) Threads about Musical Instrument Amps of all kinds should be in the Instruments & Amps forum |
| diyAudio Sponsor | ||
|
|
||
|
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|
#1 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Oct 2007
|
I've always looked schematics with a pair of El84's and always found there were fixed bias... why aren't many of them with grid bias? Is it the sound that's better with fixed bias? It would have better perfomance with adjustable bias, right?
thanks |
|
|
|
|
#2 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Newark, DE
|
I believe that Roger Modjeski's RM 10 amplifier has the bias voltage applied to the grid, rather than supplied via a fixed cathode resistance. I've listened to Eric Hayes' TAL 1773 amplifier which also runs pairs of EL84 in push/pull, grid biased configuration. It is a wonderful amplifier, which sounds more powerful than an EL84 amp should.
I think that EL84 perform reasonably well with cathode bias, and most manufacturers would rather not incur even the slight increase in cost and complexity required by a grid bias design. |
|
|
|
|
#3 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Auckland, NZ
|
"fixed" bias vs cathode bias. Both bias the grid. Majority I have seen are cathode bias either using a simple resistor or a piece of sand - are we talking the same terminology?
__________________
Yes, conservatism thrives on low intelligence and poor information. But the liberals in politics... continue to back off, yielding to the supremacy of the stupid. It's turkeys all the way down. - George Monbiot, guardian.co.uk, 6 Feb 2012 |
|
|
|
|
#4 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Newark, DE
|
I suspect the original poster is using the term "fixed bias" for situations where the bias is set by a fixed value cathode resistor. The other popular bias strategy is to use a variable pot to apply a negative bias voltage directly to the grid.
I believe the confusion arises since the grid applied bias strategy is frequently referred to as "fixed bias". It is fixed in the sense that the bias voltage is always constant, regardless of the music signal applied to the circuit. It is necessary that this kind of fixed bias circuit be adjustable to accommodate differences in output tubes. The cathode biased circuits are non-adjustable, but the bias voltage (in terms of potential between grid and cathode) is not "fixed" in the sense that it will vary depending on the amplitude of the input signal. As ever larger input signals are applied, the current through the tube will increase. The curious thing is that this increased current through the cathode resistor will result in a larger voltage drop across it, causing a greater bias to be applied to the tube. |
|
|
|
|
#5 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Oct 2007
|
Well, I was talking about bias the output with a large resistor from grid to ground (isn't it self bias?) and the other method, using a negative voltage with a pot to adjust the quiescent current through the tubes (if it's fixed by a non adjustable voltage divider it's the same, but not what I was refering with fixed bias). I always found PP EL84 with the self bias method.
|
|
|
| Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|
|
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| EL84 Push-Pull ccs bias | Tobruk | Tubes / Valves | 14 | 2nd May 2007 11:19 PM |
| Will this work for an EL84 push pull? | zobsky | Tubes / Valves | 5 | 10th October 2006 07:42 PM |
| modify parallel push-pull EL84 to single push-pull | chungtat | Tubes / Valves | 12 | 3rd November 2005 11:25 PM |
| EL84 push pull idea | mark_titano | Tubes / Valves | 20 | 13th June 2005 02:51 PM |
| EL84 Push Pull amp. | hacknet | Tubes / Valves | 8 | 23rd September 2004 05:53 AM |
| New To Site? | Need Help? |
| Page generated in 0.10106 seconds (56.94% PHP - 43.06% MySQL) with 10 queries |