I'm thinking most of these tubes must be really old like early '50's or late '40's, because I believe they were making small plate 12AT7's as early as the mid '50's. Anybody have an opinion on how these tubes sounded as opposed to the later small plate versions? I just picked up a sleeve of International Servicemaster labeled 12AT7's (so only know that they were made in USA) that have plate structures as large as, say, 12BX7's which have a much larger bulb and double the filament current rating. I also have a sleeve of Westinghouse branded 6AX7's which have very large plate structures, also. Generally speaking, I figure the big or long plate construction (more like the octal 6SL7 et al) probably should be an advantage sonically.
Haven't yet listened to them, but their grid windings generally sound pretty tight (usually means less microphonic) as per my 'tap' test.
Haven't yet listened to them, but their grid windings generally sound pretty tight (usually means less microphonic) as per my 'tap' test.
Conversely, several highly regarded tube amp companies in the '70s and '80s sought out the tiny plate 12AX/T7s that came in a slightly fat bottle. Though the indicated country of origin varied widely, I understand that they had an Eastern European source.
These days, despite having maybe 20 or 30 different kinds of 12AX/T7s in my stash, I reach for the newer JJ versions. Significantly less distortion, low microphonics, low price. What's not to love?
These days, despite having maybe 20 or 30 different kinds of 12AX/T7s in my stash, I reach for the newer JJ versions. Significantly less distortion, low microphonics, low price. What's not to love?
I haven't tried JJ tubes as of yet. Maybe I should give them a try. I was using the Chinese 12ax7 for a while, but eventually became rather dissatisfied with them - their level of detail was exceeded by more than one type of NOS tube I had. Btw, have you tried substituting 5751's for 12ax7's? I've recently switched to them on the input stage of my home brew phono preamp and am currently using a NOS pair that kicks *** as far as detail retrieval, etc. Don't want to say exactly which 5751 it is because it's getting kinda scarce and expensive and I'm stocking up, but I can say I tried it because someone in a 12ax7/5751 comparo said it had the absolute best detail of any he tried, but was too 'relentless' for his taste. So, I initially also found it, but effectively fixed that to my satisfaction by adding extra damping (mostly viscoelastic) materials to my preamp and power amp tube and chassis dampers. I should mention that this stage is operating as the first phono gain stage, without feedback and before any equalization.
Hi,
Probably Polish and East-German ones from RFT and so on.
Never really liked those, no close tolerance and pretty flaky.
Very, very cheap though.
Favourite ECC83 is still the unbeatable Telefunken.
RCA 7025 are very nice too.
ECC808 is better still, E283CC also but but run a different pinout.
Cheers,
P.S. 5751 is really a different tube.
Probably Polish and East-German ones from RFT and so on.
Never really liked those, no close tolerance and pretty flaky.
Very, very cheap though.
Favourite ECC83 is still the unbeatable Telefunken.
RCA 7025 are very nice too.
ECC808 is better still, E283CC also but but run a different pinout.
Cheers,
P.S. 5751 is really a different tube.
Ok, so I'll say what type it is, because I see that fdegrove has been quite specific. It's the GE black plate 3 mica silver clip 5751. I had some all along but only recently rediscovered them & tried them in place of some Philips late '70's 5751's and was suitably impressed. With the extra damping (= less overall microphonics in system), the 'relentlessness' fairly quickly resolved itself into a very good sense of neutrality and the best detail retrieval I've heard out of my system to date. Nothing has been lost as far as spaciousness, either, if the recording has it. In fact, the 3 dimensionality is more convincing than before, overall. There simply appears to be less 'interpolation' or 'smoothing' with this 5751 than any tube I've tried in the phono preamp input stage so far.
Hi,
Know that one but good luck finding some stock.
You're observation is however quite correct.
Given a sympathetic phono stage these are awesome little valves.
Not too many phonostages where actually designed around a 5751 though (C-J maybe?), so make sure the mere substitution doesn't alter the RIAA correction.
Cheers,
Know that one but good luck finding some stock.
You're observation is however quite correct.
Given a sympathetic phono stage these are awesome little valves.
Not too many phonostages where actually designed around a 5751 though (C-J maybe?), so make sure the mere substitution doesn't alter the RIAA correction.
Cheers,
Hi,
Yep.
Many years ago quite alot of computer valves of the 6xxx series found themselves rebranded as there was a shortage of decent quality valves of the ECC8x series.
That 6000 series quite often sported big plates in bulbs the size of a 12BH7A and slightly taller.
Microphony was of no concern, neither was noise.....
Cheers,
316a said:
Yep.
Many years ago quite alot of computer valves of the 6xxx series found themselves rebranded as there was a shortage of decent quality valves of the ECC8x series.
That 6000 series quite often sported big plates in bulbs the size of a 12BH7A and slightly taller.
Microphony was of no concern, neither was noise.....
Cheers,
SY said:
The inconsistent quality. I had to stop carrying the ECC83S because the reject rate was approaching 50%! I simply couldn't afford to carry them, and I still don't.
BTW, I like RFT (the East German made tube you mentioned) stuff. They make as good an EZ81/6CA4 as was ever made, and their 12AU7 is a very well balanced, quiet tube with (IMHO) excellent tonal quality. Guitar guys kill for their ECC83s and EL34s.
They were relabeled (most often labeled "made in England") to avoid letting people know they came from behind the Iron Curtain.
Anyway, that's my $0.02 worth on it
Hi,
Those were probably made by EI in former Yugoslavia.
Since they were a Philips subsidiary you often found them rebranded as Mazda, Adzam and other local Philips subbrands etc. at some point shortly after most Western-European plants stopped manufacturing those valves.
ECC81, 2 and 3 were all build using the same tall plates.
Cheers,
Those were probably made by EI in former Yugoslavia.
Since they were a Philips subsidiary you often found them rebranded as Mazda, Adzam and other local Philips subbrands etc. at some point shortly after most Western-European plants stopped manufacturing those valves.
ECC81, 2 and 3 were all build using the same tall plates.
Cheers,
5965 draws 50% more heater current than 12AT7 (225 mA @ 12V) - as does 6414 (which is taller). I've heard of both being relabled as 12AT7. International Servicemaster could be ANYTHING...
http://www.vacuumtubesinc.com/VacuumTubesHallofShame.aspx
http://www.vacuumtubesinc.com/VacuumTubesHallofShame.aspx
Geek said:
6201
It may not be a typo.
He could mean a 6211, it is a computer tube with a mu of about 27 that is used sometimes as a 12AU7 sub. They can sound quite nice, BTW - but most are terribly microphonic. I got a bunch not too long ago and about 75% were microphonic.
But I suspect the tube is a relabeled 5965 (5965 mu is 47 IIRC).
Looks like 6414 to me, computer grade version of the 5965 family or maybe 6201. Lower mu (47) than 12AT7/ECC81 but good and strong, and have lower microphony. I have tried a few ECC81 alternatives, new and old with varying results, (except for GEC A2900's, which are a bit pricey for me). I have settled on Brimar 6060's which can still be found cheaply, as they seem to be undiscovered, (better buy some more before sending this out!)
- Status
- This old topic is closed. If you want to reopen this topic, contact a moderator using the "Report Post" button.