
Home  Forums  Rules  Articles  diyAudio Store  Gallery  Wiki  Blogs  Register  Donations  FAQ  Calendar  Search  Today's Posts  Mark Forums Read  Search 
Tubes / Valves All about our sweet vacuum tubes :) Threads about Musical Instrument Amps of all kinds should be in the Instruments & Amps forum 

Please consider donating to help us continue to serve you.
Ads on/off / Custom Title / More PMs / More album space / Advanced printing & mass image saving 

Thread Tools  Search this Thread 
16th May 2009, 07:16 AM  #1 
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Leverkusen

Computing or measuring anode curves w/ CFB
Gentlemen,
some of you may know the triodestrapped or ULop curves I measured and plotted over the years, see here. The measuring setup to do so is trivial for triode(d) plots and only slightly more complex for UL (screen FB) ones. Now I would like to do some measurements and plots of anode curves with cathode FB applied, but I wasnīt able to come up neither with a measuring setup nor a mathematical approach to transform already taken triode(d) or pentode/BPT or screen FB datasets into CFB ones. So far I suspect that a direct measuring approach couldnīt be set up easily on the bench, IOW would be too complex and not practical. Maybe a mathematical approach to transform datasets that already have been taken would be easier and more practical, but I must admit this exceeds my current knowledge how to do such a transformation (BTW, I am using Excel for storing and visualizing the data sets). Any idea would be greatly appreciated, thank you! Regards, Tom Schlangen EDIT/P.S.: Qualitatively it is easy to predict what the application of CFB will do to the anode family of curves: The grid curves will narrow together (since mu will drop) and get steeper (since gm will rise). What is missing is how to derive the quantitative change for a given percentage of CFB...
__________________
If in doubt, just measure. 
17th May 2009, 05:40 PM  #2 
Account disabled at member's request
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: Hickory, NC

Tom,
CFB amounts to just changing the reference point for ground, which just shifts the input voltage by %X of the output swing. So just add X% of the plate voltage swing (variance from B+) to the grid input voltage data. The problem comes up when trying to chart this new data conventionally (constat Vg curves) since the usual constant grid voltage curves aren't constant any more in the adjusted data. So I would suggest taking finer grid delta Vg curves initially in the grounded cathode setup, then CFB adjust the grid Vg data by adding X% of Vp delta. Then you will have to interpolate through the dataset to compose constant Vg curves. This would mean finding the nearest two Vg datapoints in the adjusted dataset to the desired const Vg at each Vp point on a curve. So first select a Vp point. Then search the dataset at that Vp for the nearest Vg above and below the desired constant Vg. So let Q=(desired Vgconst  lesser Vg at datapoint)/(greater Vg at datapoint  lesser Vg at datapoint). Then deltaIp = Q (delta of Ip between lesser Vg and greater Vg datapoints) So the final Ip = Ip of the lesser Vg datapoint + deltaIp. Clear as mud no doubt.  By the way, I am working on modding a Tek curve tracer, and have decided that additional data displays beside the usual Ip versus Vp at constant Vg plots would be greatly desired. I'm hoping to display triode or g2/g1 Mu versus Vg at stepped constant current levels or with a specific plate load versus Vg. (Small HF AC signal injected to grid, frequency selective V or I detector at the plate) Could then easily display grid 1 Gm versus the operating points too. Everyone is familiar with the usual plate curves, but they don't really display the data a designer would most like to see. Why not produce the directly useful data curves too. Don 
19th May 2009, 09:48 PM  #3 
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Leverkusen

Thank you very much Don,
I think your suggestions show up a viable way to do this sort of plots. Meanwhile I had a serious look at MathCAD and I am quite sure a transformation of already gained data can be done by pure mathematics, too. I also found some interesting hints in one of the old, but groundbreaking books from German Professor Barkhausen for a mathematical approach. Regardless of methods to be used in the end, isnīt it somewhat disturbing how many people talk about the merits of CFB while seemingly only very few can give hard mathematical facts about its influence on anode family of curves? Thank you again, Tom
__________________
If in doubt, just measure. 
19th May 2009, 10:31 PM  #4 
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: Ann Arbor, MI

heyHey!!!,
CFB is doing the same thing as UL unless you do it McIntoshstyle and keep g2k voltage constant. Dealing with the appearant input voltage requirements or the real one( g1k ) could pose issues. Aside from the McIntosh rigging, I have not seen OPT designed for pentode operation with tap references at the same percentage as the CFB coil. cheers, Douglas
__________________
the Tnuctipun will return 
Thread Tools  Search this Thread 


Similar Threads  
Thread  Thread Starter  Forum  Replies  Last Post 
nVidia CUDA GPU computing PC FIR  KOON3876  Digital Line Level  68  4th December 2013 07:28 AM 
tube basics: computing mu and transconductance  jarthel  Tubes / Valves  11  31st January 2012 11:15 PM 
Derive Triode Curves from Pentode Curves?  dsavitsk  Tubes / Valves  3  14th May 2007 06:10 PM 
Measuring TriodeConnected Pentode Curves  rdf  Tubes / Valves  23  11th April 2006 09:29 PM 
Computing question: VPNs  trwh  Everything Else  2  1st November 2004 11:25 PM 
New To Site?  Need Help? 