• WARNING: Tube/Valve amplifiers use potentially LETHAL HIGH VOLTAGES.
    Building, troubleshooting and testing of these amplifiers should only be
    performed by someone who is thoroughly familiar with
    the safety precautions around high voltages.

The Trioderizer

Status
This old topic is closed. If you want to reopen this topic, contact a moderator using the "Report Post" button.
ssabaud said:
Hi,

I found this article on the web :

http://www.radiomuseum.org/forum/the_trioderizer_a_solid_state_triode.html

Could it be so simple ? I would like to have your feedback

Regards
Zig

Cool! I haven't got around to curve tracing the Schadeode yet,
but that's what I expected to see.

http://www.diyaudio.com/forums/showthread.php?s=&threadid=135052&highlight=

I call it the Schadeode in honor of O.H. Schade who was the first
I'm aware of to publish a description of turning a pentode or
tetrode into a triode characteristic by the use of plate-grid
feedback.

http://www.pmillett.com/tubedata/beam_power_tubes.pdf

Cheers,

Michael
 
Earlier today I finished curve-tracing sims to show the similarity between MOSFETs and pentodes with reference to Schade. I used IRFP240 and EL84 to show and verify.

Will publish them later today when I am at the right computer.

The main problem, as I see it, is the input series resistor of the shunt feedback in combination with the input-capacitanace of the device. As Wavebourn says MOSFETs have bigger problems as they have non-linear capacitances (with the already high steady).

Nelson Pass used this concept in his Zens but had to go down to ca 1kohm resistors to get good enough bandwith. Wonder if he had read Schade before...........

About pentodes its not that bad but my Schade-sims of a upcoming 6AQ5 SE with gyrator-loaded 6C45 tells me the seriesresistor should not be bigger than 15k.
 
EL84,
Dont mind the figures, this is just to show what Schade already showed in 1938!
 

Attachments

  • penttri.jpg
    penttri.jpg
    83.1 KB · Views: 1,188
I think the capacitance issue can be mitigated by using a FET for the
input with the source on the input resistor or equivalent because
the Ciss will be bootstrapped by the varying voltage drop across
the resistor, and the feedback resistor can be made small enough
to drive the gate of the output MOSFET. IF you don't want 1/Gfs
for your Rp equivalent, there will also be a source resistor to bootstrap
the Ciss of the output FET.

I sort of like the idea of a MOSFET input and a pentode output.

Michael
 

Attachments

  • schadeode2.png
    schadeode2.png
    5.6 KB · Views: 1,114
Status
This old topic is closed. If you want to reopen this topic, contact a moderator using the "Report Post" button.