Go Back   Home > Forums > Amplifiers > Tubes / Valves
Home Forums Rules Articles Store Gallery Blogs Register Donations FAQ Calendar Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read

Tubes / Valves All about our sweet vacuum tubes :) Threads about Musical Instrument Amps of all kinds should be in the Instruments & Amps forum

diyAudio Sponsor

Search for a tube at thetubestore.com                            Product reviews and more

Audio tubes for any amplifier: from high end home audio to classic guitar amps.

Quick links by tube type: 12AX7, EL34, 6L6, KT66, 6550, KT88, EL84, 12AU7, 12AT7, 6922, 6H30, 300B, 6V6, 6SN7 

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 10th May 2009, 10:46 PM   #61
Jeb-D. is offline Jeb-D.  United States
diyAudio Member
 
Jeb-D.'s Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: SoCal
Quote:
Penny for your thoughts.
With a choke on the anode, it is going to steal voltage which could be used for the load instead. I really don't see an effective way to apply cross coupled feedback with cathode follower output. Having the feedback go to the local driver would really be a more elegant solution. If you run the output common-cathode, then cross-coupled feedback would be the right ticket.

Garter bias won't ensure that the cathode voltages are the same. They will be closer than they would be without it, but not an exact match. Also, having the transformer DC coupled between cathodes is going to ruin the affect of garter bias, unless the DCR is about 10x the value of the bias resistor. If the DCR is significantly lower than the bias resistors, it's going to behave similar to a single shared cathode resistor .

With the cathode follower output, you are probably going to need more supply voltage for the driver. The output gain is going to be about .4-.5 (perfect signal level for screen feedback, like UL). This means your going to need a peak voltage of around 60V(with bias of -30Vgk) to drive it to full power. I'd probably make a negative rail off the existing transformer (so you have and equal +/- voltage). You could then direct couple the the drivers screen grid to the output tubes cathode.
  Reply With Quote
Old 11th May 2009, 09:03 AM   #62
diyAudio Member
 
Shoog's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: Eire
I'm not certain I agree with you on the garter not producing a matched voltage. If it creates a matched current then there has to be a matched voltage since it is going through a simple resistor. If the current is balanced to within 1mA, in my example the voltage imbalance would be about 0.7V which for most tranaformers would create little problem. However I take your point on it shorting out the Garter - so its a none runner.

The whole idea of getting the cathodes current and voltage balanced is a none runner really. Since there are three contol elements and what i am trying to achieve is to fix all three - its impossable.
The only solution would be to ground the cathode transformer, fix the anode voltage and then servo the grid bias. This may be a path worth investigating - and I suspect that Gary Pimm may have a suitable circuit.

On the point of the plate choke. I think you are a bit wrong. The plate choke will consume far less voltage than a voltage follower, and will be able to swing above +B which will allow for greater overall efficiency especially when entering class B - which is where the benefits of cross coupled feedback would come into play.

Research - research - research - O what fun.

Shoog
  Reply With Quote
Old 11th May 2009, 05:29 PM   #63
Jeb-D. is offline Jeb-D.  United States
diyAudio Member
 
Jeb-D.'s Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: SoCal
Quote:
If it creates a matched current then there has to be a matched voltage since it is going through a simple resistor.
It creates a closer-to, matched current and voltage, but they will only be an exact match if the tubes are. Think, if both voltages and currents are equal, both tubes will have the same grid voltage as well. This means they both would have identical Vgk.

Quote:
On the point of the plate choke. I think you are a bit wrong. The plate choke will consume far less voltage than a voltage follower
Sorry, but it is true... that output, for the most part is a cathodyne phase splitter with mis-matched loads. For a given delta current, it will create voltage = I x R. The choke running with little shunt resistance will have a higher impedance than the transformers primary and hence create more voltage. However, the current drawn at the point of saturation will be much less (because the choke impedance is part of the loadline).

If you were to shunt the choke with a resistor, it would lower the amount of voltage dropped across the choke, but it is going to be stealing power from the load. Example, the primary impedance of the transformer is 1k. You shunt the choke with 1k. The tube will see a 2k load. They will see equal voltages in this case which means that resistor will get half the power and the other half will be distributed to the load. However, you are correct in saying the plate will swing above B+, but the cathode is no longer going to swing as far below ground potential, apposed to just putting a 2k load on the cathode.

Another example. You decide to shunt the choke with a low value resistor to minimize power losses to the output. We'll select 100R. You use a transformer impedance of 100R less in order to keep the same load impedance. The circuit has a delta I of 100mA, this would give 10V across the choke + shunt resistor. So, the 100R resistor will dissipate 1W which could have been going to the load.
  Reply With Quote
Old 11th May 2009, 06:10 PM   #64
diyAudio Member
 
Shoog's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: Eire
Thanks for the input Jed,
I have come on a bit of a brick wall on this whole concept at the moment. The thing I will have to look into is self adjusting fixed bias - but there doesn't seem to be a lot of information out there so it obviously not a walk in the park to implement.

Unfortunately I have more pressing matters to attend to in the next fortnight, so i'm going to put this to bed for the moment. Its been a great brain workout and learning experience so far.

Cheers

Shoog
  Reply With Quote
Old 11th May 2009, 06:42 PM   #65
Jeb-D. is offline Jeb-D.  United States
diyAudio Member
 
Jeb-D.'s Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: SoCal
Quote:
Its been a great brain workout and learning experience so far.
That's the most important part. I've tried many ideas that didn't work, but a lot was learned from it. Some of which are concepts that can be applicable down the road.

BTW, The student edition of circuitmaker is a free download. It's a simulation program that is very intuitive (easy to use). The tube models it comes with to start are very limited, but I found a way to edit + add them. It is an extremely useful tool. You should give it a try.

P.S. The ECF80 is a hidden gem IMO. They aren't very linear in some configurations, but it always manages to sound good. I recently purchased a small quantity of the russian equivalents (6F1P). They are nice and dirt cheap.
  Reply With Quote
Old 11th May 2009, 07:13 PM   #66
diyAudio Member
 
Shoog's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: Eire
I'm really happy with my ECF80 SLCF implementation. I am running the three tube SLCF at about 430V which gives each element a good 130V to play with - I'm also running them hard at 10mA. The front end has a 39K load so it gets the best out of it, and its great to have 8V of bias on the input. Really your right, it runs hard and plays hard - great tube. Its cheap enough to (shush don't tell anyone).

Shoog
  Reply With Quote

Reply


Hide this!Advertise here!

Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Looking for a cheap dual pentode Bitrex Tubes / Valves 3 17th June 2009 08:30 PM
Looking for a small yet powerful pentode / dual triode? space-cake Tubes / Valves 15 19th September 2007 05:53 PM
Suitable dual gang pot for NIGC LM3875? findog Chip Amps 50 19th April 2005 09:23 AM
Suitable regulated/filtered 4volt battery-valve power supply suitable for 6+ valves? Layberinthius Tubes / Valves 0 11th March 2004 08:49 PM


New To Site? Need Help?

All times are GMT. The time now is 05:13 AM.

Page generated in 0.09964 seconds (76.59% PHP - 23.41% MySQL) with 11 queries

Copyright ©1999-2012 diyAudio