|
|
|||||||
| Home | Forums | Rules | Articles | Store | Gallery | Blogs | Register | Donations | FAQ | Calendar | Search | Today's Posts | Mark Forums Read | Search |
| Tubes / Valves All about our sweet vacuum tubes :) Threads about Musical Instrument Amps of all kinds should be in the Instruments & Amps forum |
| diyAudio Sponsor | ||
|
|
||
|
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|
#1 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Feb 2009
|
I am looking for a 220 Mega Ohm resistor so I can build a replica of a Neumann UM 57. The schematic says 220 Mega Ohms with 20 % but I would prefer 1%. I can't find anyone who will sell me less than 1,000!!! I'd also prefer not to put several in series if I don't have too...
J |
|
|
|
|
#2 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: New Mexico
|
careful who you buy it from. Fingerprints can ruin it.
|
|
|
|
|
#3 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Los Angeles
|
Mouser sells 200 meg and 250 meg, Digi-key used to as well (probably still do). Is it so critical that it needs to bee 220 meg @ 1%??
http://www.mouser.com/catalog/637/656.pdf |
|
|
|
|
#4 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Taxland, New Jersey
|
High meg resistors like this are made by Victoreen and some others. They often come encapsulated in glass but not always because 200 meg is not all that high of a value as far as high megs go. Keithley instruments uses some in their electrometers and picoamp sources. And there're often much higher up in the gigaohm range.
If you have a way of measuring high megohms, you might be able to make one with India ink painted on a short insulated rod. You'll need to experiment with length. The more ink, the lower the value. But India ink is pretty high resistance wise. I did this as a kid for a Geiger counter project in an old magazine artical. This works better for higher resistance around 100K meg. BTW, for your microphone project a tolorance of 1% is totally unnecessary and a waste of money. It's just not critical and you won't hear any difference. 200 megs will work just as well. Victor
__________________
"The supercomputer is technologically impossible. It would take all of the water that flows over Niagara Falls to cool the heat generated by the number of vacuum tubes required." ~ Professor of Electrical Engineering, New York University |
|
|
|
|
#5 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: Lakewood, Ohio
|
"R&D Electronics" also known as Electronic Surplus was down the street from the Victoreen and Keithley factories in Cleveland. In the distant past we purchased high Meg value resistors from them. They recently moved the store to an Eastern suburb. Don't know what they have in stock, these days.
http://www.electronicsurplus.com/
__________________
Kevin |
|
|
|
|
#6 | |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Taxland, New Jersey
|
Quote:
Victor
__________________
"The supercomputer is technologically impossible. It would take all of the water that flows over Niagara Falls to cool the heat generated by the number of vacuum tubes required." ~ Professor of Electrical Engineering, New York University |
|
|
|
|
|
#7 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Bridgeville, CA
|
The Ohmite Mini-Mox recommended by kaos are the ones often
used in microphones. Those are the blue ones. The UM-57 has 2 of these resistors, one to supply the fixed polarization voltage to the capsule center plate, and the other as grid leak for the EC92. I'd go with 250M. The value should not be critical but could influence the LF roll-off slightly. I'm looking inside a M-582 I have but can't see any high ohm resistors to see what type they use. The important thing is to keep the grid circuit away from anything with high leakage. FR-4 PC boards are too leaky. Polycarbonate is OK; any plastic that will hold a static charge. I think teflon is OK also. The grid circuit should also be physically as short as possible and right under the capsule mount. Does the UM-57 use an M7 capsule? What capsule are you using? Sounds like a fun project. They have a lot of DIY mic discussion on the Prodigy Pro board. Cheers, Michael |
|
|
|
|
#8 |
|
diyAudio Member
|
You don't need 1% really. If I remember right M7 has something like 80 pF capacitance, what impedance that means on 40 Hz frequency?
__________________
The devil is not so terrible as his mathematical model! Wavebourn: We Create Creativity! |
|
|
|
|
#9 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Bridgeville, CA
|
The K49 is about 80pF/side and I think the M7 must be about the
same. That's about 50Mohms at 40 Hz, and there are 2 220M resistors in parallel which results in a 110M/160M voltage divider. That's a little over -3db at 40 Hz. That sounds about right. The U47 has 100M, the M49 has 2x150M in parallel with about the same capacitance per capsule side. The C12, which has a similar polarization scheme to the UM-57, has 2x250M in parallel. |
|
|
|
|
#10 | |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: Lakewood, Ohio
|
Quote:
__________________
Kevin |
|
|
|
| Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|
|
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Mega parallel DACs ? | Bernhard | Digital Source | 3 | 20th November 2004 03:03 AM |
| New To Site? | Need Help? |
| Page generated in 0.10081 seconds (81.47% PHP - 18.53% MySQL) with 11 queries |