|
|
|||||||
| Home | Forums | Rules | Articles | Store | Gallery | Blogs | Register | Donations | FAQ | Calendar | Search | Today's Posts | Mark Forums Read | Search |
| Tubes / Valves All about our sweet vacuum tubes :) Threads about Musical Instrument Amps of all kinds should be in the Instruments & Amps forum |
| diyAudio Sponsor | ||
|
|
||
|
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|
#1 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Aug 2006
|
http://www.tubezone.net/pdf/6sn7.pdf
There are two sets of operating stats for this tube. Is one set of stats for the first triode and the second set of stats for the 2nd triode, or are the two internal triodes the same ? Are these stats just representative of what could be expected with different plate voltages ? Basically , do the two triodes have the same specs, or are they as different as the two sets of specs indicate ? Thanks......................Blake |
|
|
|
|
#2 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: San Diego
|
The two different operating stats, are for two different operating points. They apply to each triode. The confusion is caused by the heading for the interelectrode capacitances shown above the operating parameters. Those are slightly different for each triode, because the tube is not a perfect mirror image section to section. The distance from component to pin varies a little. But, the triode 1, triode 2 heading only applies to the capacitances. Clear as mud?
Now to confuse you a bit more; sometimes tubes contain dissimilar triodes. Of course, those will have completely different operating parameters and are shown as such. And some tubes, such as the 6922 have identical triodes, as far as an amplifier, but are designed to be used in a cascode. In this case, the tolerance for cathode to heater voltage can be different, as one section should be used for the top and one for the bottom of the cascode. If used a just a twin triode, they are treated the same. Sheldon |
|
|
|
|
#3 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Aug 2006
|
Thanks. You hit the nail on the head. I wasn't sure if the heading showing the capacitance for the 2 sections dropped down to the rest of the stats. Now I see .
I was wondering why everyone thought 12AX7's were so great when they seemed to be such a mismatched set of triodes. That clears it up. Thanks again...........................Blake |
|
|
| Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|
|
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Stereo Buffer with a single twin triode | Brit01 | Tubes / Valves | 43 | 29th July 2009 02:32 PM |
| Best/favorite CF NOS noval twin triode? | leadbelly | Tubes / Valves | 34 | 19th April 2008 04:37 PM |
| Any subs for 6N1 & 6N2 twin triode valves? | rcavictim | Tubes / Valves | 39 | 20th April 2005 02:19 PM |
| mmm.... zero-bias class B twin triode amp | Circlotron | Tubes / Valves | 6 | 5th March 2003 12:49 AM |
| New To Site? | Need Help? |
| Page generated in 0.06092 seconds (80.82% PHP - 19.18% MySQL) with 10 queries |