|
|
|||||||
| Home | Forums | Rules | Articles | Store | Gallery | Blogs | Register | Donations | FAQ | Calendar | Search | Today's Posts | Mark Forums Read | Search |
| Tubes / Valves All about our sweet vacuum tubes :) Threads about Musical Instrument Amps of all kinds should be in the Instruments & Amps forum |
| diyAudio Sponsor | ||
|
|
||
|
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|
#1 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: Perth
|
Is the 6BG6 a direct sub for the KT66 ? My Riders tube sub book doesn't give an answer to this one.
TIA, Peter. |
|
|
|
|
#2 |
|
diyAudio Member
|
Hi Peter
As far as my memory goes, the 6BG6 is an octal version of the 6L6 with a different pinout and a topcap. That makes it a sister of the 807, which I know has been succesfully implemented in Quad 2 amplifiers, which originally employed KT66's. So, it should work, but lets wait what others have to say about it! Erik
__________________
my surname is indeed 'de Best': neither misspelling nor snobbism! Ask SY! |
|
|
|
|
#3 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: Plainsboro, NJ
|
It depends on the vintage. In this case, "recent" is better. The last bunch of 6BG6s made have 6L6GC innards. Older samples can't safely dissipate as much power.
If you get newer production 6BG6 stock, they are quite suitable (electrically) as KT66 substitutes. Look here for more details.
__________________
Eli D. |
|
|
|
|
#4 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: Perth
|
thanks for the help with this one, i have a pair of old williamson amps that run kt66's.
i have quite a stock of "old" 6BG6G's which is why i asked the question. What if i drop the HT by a couple of volts would that cut the plate dissipation by enough? |
|
|
|
|
#5 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Pretoria, South Africa
|
Yea, nothing to really add to what Eli has said, except that 6L6 is a very generic term. It was such a successful design that the structure has not really been changed over decades, except for increasing power handling capacity by larger anode area, layered material and improved electrode mounting. Thus one got a 6L6 and 807 (Pa=19W), 6L6GB and 5881 (23W), 6L6GC (30W) and 7027 (35W)
6L6 characteristics are within tube manufacture spread (10%) of KT66, but heater current 40% less. (I notice Russian KT66s use 6L6 innards anyway.) Eli has given the full picture. (And for myself, for 6BG6 I rather rewired than use the cumbersome adapter.) |
|
|
| Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|
|
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Super 6BG6 vs. 6550 | wrenchone | Tubes / Valves | 13 | 3rd September 2008 06:36 AM |
| 6BG6 = 6L6GC with top cap - cheap! | ray_moth | Tubes / Valves | 6 | 31st May 2007 05:46 PM |
| NEW KT66's | Trout | Tubes / Valves | 18 | 7th February 2007 07:08 AM |
| Has anybody built 6BG6 or similar OTL amp? | rnx69 | Tubes / Valves | 2 | 14th April 2004 01:25 PM |
| Gas-coupled 6L6/6BG6-G SE | Joel | Tubes / Valves | 11 | 16th February 2003 10:08 PM |
| New To Site? | Need Help? |
| Page generated in 0.07000 seconds (75.08% PHP - 24.92% MySQL) with 10 queries |