Go Back   Home > Forums > Amplifiers > Tubes / Valves
Home Forums Rules Articles Store Gallery Blogs Register Donations FAQ Calendar Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read

Tubes / Valves All about our sweet vacuum tubes :) Threads about Musical Instrument Amps of all kinds should be in the Instruments & Amps forum

diyAudio Sponsor

Search for a tube at thetubestore.com                            Product reviews and more

Audio tubes for any amplifier: from high end home audio to classic guitar amps.

Quick links by tube type: 12AX7, EL34, 6L6, KT66, 6550, KT88, EL84, 12AU7, 12AT7, 6922, 6H30, 300B, 6V6, 6SN7 

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 12th October 2008, 12:37 AM   #1
diyAudio Member
 
SpreadSpectrum's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Default Bias resistor for source follower driver

I'm using fqpf2n80's as source follower drivers (direct coupled to KT88 grids). I apply bias to the gates of the 2n80's which are capacitively coupled to the previous stage. I'm currently using 500k resistors to bias the gates of the 2n80's. I'm considering increasing this resistor.

My question is, how high is too high?
  Reply With Quote
Old 13th October 2008, 06:57 PM   #2
diyAudio Member
 
SpreadSpectrum's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Anyone? I want to apply bias through a 1meg resistor to the FET gate. Anyone see anything wrong with that? How much would be too much?
  Reply With Quote
Old 13th October 2008, 07:04 PM   #3
wa2ise is offline wa2ise  United States
diyAudio Member
 
wa2ise's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: NJ
I don't know enough about that FET, but if you are concerned about losing too much bass because of a lower resistance value, you can use a larger coupling cap instead. Other than that, I can't really help.
__________________
  Reply With Quote
Old 13th October 2008, 07:07 PM   #4
diyAudio Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: Itoculo
The question is interesting, so I keep an eye on the thread, but unfortunately I can't help...
__________________
my surname is indeed 'de Best': neither misspelling nor snobbism! Ask SY!
  Reply With Quote
Old 13th October 2008, 07:12 PM   #5
Fuling is offline Fuling  Sweden
diyAudio Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2001
Location: Sweden (Mora)
1M should be perfectly fine, I´ve seen circuits with several Megaohms in that position.
A side note: Perhaps you just want to get away with small coupling caps but if it is your driver stage that cannot drive 500k you might sface some problems driving the input capacitances in the mosfets.

BR
/Daniel
  Reply With Quote
Old 13th October 2008, 07:16 PM   #6
diyAudio Member
 
SpreadSpectrum's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Quote:
if you are concerned about losing too much bass because of a lower resistance value
Actually, I want to increase the resistance to use a lower value cap (or improve the bass performance with the current cap). I'm just concerned that there is something that is going to get me if the value is too high. Is my only consideration the leakage through the coupling cap to the previous stage? Do I consider the FET to have a truly infinite input impedance?
  Reply With Quote
Old 13th October 2008, 07:17 PM   #7
diyAudio Member
 
SpreadSpectrum's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Previous stage is 6SN7 LTP. 500k sounds fine, I just thought that 1M might sound a tiny bit better.
  Reply With Quote
Old 13th October 2008, 07:22 PM   #8
diyAudio Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: Plainsboro, NJ
The FQPF2N80 appears to be a useful part. Unlike tubes, FETs are immune to contact biasing effects. Even a 10 MOhm gate to ground resistor rates to be safe. Don't forget to use a Carbon comp. gate stopper right at the FET's gate terminal.
__________________
Eli D.
  Reply With Quote
Old 13th October 2008, 07:26 PM   #9
diyAudio Member
 
SpreadSpectrum's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
The FQPF2n80 sounds good. I've got the gate stopper. I'll try out higher valued resistors today.
  Reply With Quote
Old 14th October 2008, 10:55 PM   #10
diyAudio Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Adelaide South Oz
I used 1M5 without any problems which allowed the use of a 10nF coupling cap.

As a few folk have indicated above it is best to choose the FET for low input capacitance. Because you are using it as a source follower Crss is NOT multiplied (no Miller Effect) and Ciss is effectively "anti-bootstrapped" (source follows gate AC wise), as is the capacitance of the protection zener which MUST be used between gate and source. I would choose the MOSFET for low Crss. Whenever the power dissipation rating is adequate I like to use ZVN0545A.

The power rail to the MOSFET drain must be clean and tight and you need to make sure that on the most positive signal swing at the source you still maintain a minimum of say 30V from Drain to Source. This will help minimise effects of the Crss being modulated by the audio signal.

Cheers,
Ian
  Reply With Quote

Reply


Hide this!Advertise here!

Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Direct-coupled cathode/source follower driver in PP? ray_moth Tubes / Valves 83 17th July 2008 02:53 AM
Class A2 SET using source follower driver Audio_idiot Tubes / Valves 10 2nd December 2006 12:21 AM
Bias Generator for Source Follower OPS Pwoida Solid State 2 8th September 2005 01:22 AM
Aleph-type current source, but source follower this time tschrama Pass Labs 4 29th July 2005 12:55 PM
Source follower electret mike -> use with current source? capslock Solid State 1 28th February 2003 12:54 PM


New To Site? Need Help?

All times are GMT. The time now is 09:54 AM.

Page generated in 0.09724 seconds (77.58% PHP - 22.42% MySQL) with 10 queries

Copyright ©1999-2012 diyAudio