|
|
|||||||
| Home | Forums | Rules | Articles | Store | Gallery | Blogs | Register | Donations | FAQ | Calendar | Search | Today's Posts | Mark Forums Read | Search |
| Tubes / Valves All about our sweet vacuum tubes :) Threads about Musical Instrument Amps of all kinds should be in the Instruments & Amps forum |
| diyAudio Sponsor | ||
|
|
||
|
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|
#1 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Jun 2008
|
Okay, so I was just relaxing and listening to the radio when suddenly, I hear a nice loud crackle coming from my equipment rack and I look up to see smoke billowing from my amp! Upon later inspection, I see that a filament snubber cap blew up. The amp is a S-5 8w push-pull with a 12v filament. I put in 1uf Tantalum caps for snubbers. I am a real noob with snubbers and am wondering, what did I do wrong? Are these the wrong caps? Should I remove them?
__________________
((AE)) |
|
|
|
|
#2 | ||
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: Pittsburgh, crumbling wasteland
|
Quote:
Quote:
Snubbers should be non polarized caps and usually a value much lower than 1uf. I would question if they are even needed on a filament supply. |
||
|
|
|
|
#3 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Silicon Valley
|
Tantalums are bad juju in my opinion. Some tantalum caps, especially if they are old, just spontaneously short I have pieces of analog scientific gear from the late 70s/early 80s that use gobs of tantalums for power supply bypassing. Just one of these tantalums popping brings down the entire power supply rail. If the power supply is current limited, the cap damage may be limited to a barely noticable pinhole in the capacitor's epoxy coating, making the bad one hard to find. As a result, I have some instruments gathering dust on my shelves waiting for me to pull all the old caps (~50 of them per instrument) and replace them with a mixture of film caps and modern electrolytics. Modern tantalum capacitors are better, but they still don't respond to voltage surges very well (they die), and you pay dearly for the dubious privelege of having them in your circuit.
|
|
|
|
|
#4 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Jun 2008
|
whoops! just shows what a noob I am.
could my amp be damaged?
__________________
((AE)) |
|
|
|
|
#5 | |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Taxland, New Jersey
|
Quote:
I seriously doubt that your amp was damaged. But I have seen damaged circuit boards from caps burning up.
__________________
"The supercomputer is technologically impossible. It would take all of the water that flows over Niagara Falls to cool the heat generated by the number of vacuum tubes required." ~ Professor of Electrical Engineering, New York University |
|
|
|
|
|
#6 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: Pittsburgh, crumbling wasteland
|
If tantalum caps were used as snubbers across the diodes wouldn't they have mostly AC across them? Polarized caps don't enjoy that sort of thing.
I've had small surface mount caps go off like a firecracker and shoot glowing embers. In a former life I had an SE 211 amp with caps rated for 65vdc across the cathode resistor. Not knowing how different an 845 is bias wise, I plugged one in and a while later *BOOM*. The force was so strong it bent the metal end lead on a 50 watt resistor. Not much left except for a metal end cap and some stinky white smoke. |
|
|
|
|
#7 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Maui, Hawai'i, USA
|
Yes, exactly.
Tants are polarized, and besides that, have a very high failure rate even when used properly. Your amp is not damaged. Replace the tant with a 1-10µF nonpolarized Panasonic or Nichicon. That cap is valuable, it keeps the hi-frequency nasties from the wall out of the heater, and thus the audio circuit. I always use them. Not tants. Aloha, Poinz |
|
|
|
|
#8 | |
|
diyAudio Member
|
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
|
#9 | |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Chicago
|
Quote:
http://www.cellular-news.com/coltan/
__________________
http://www.ecpaudio.com |
|
|
|
|
|
#10 | |
|
diyAudio Moderator
|
Quote:
They should never be used at more than about 60% of their rated voltage, and never in situations where they will be exposed to voltage transients. Never, ever reverse bias a tantalum for any reason. They have a variety of insidious failure mechanisms due to the way they are made, minor events may not cause immediate failure but result in catastrophic failures at some later date. Issues in manufacturing can also create areas with unusually high leakage currents which result in localized heating, additional damage and then a cascade failure which usually results in either an exploded cap or a fire. There is no real reason to use them except in rf bypass applications such as in cell phones, and I imagine the newer organic types would generally be used. They are rather expensive so I would not expect to see them in widespread use. A lot of older car stereos (stereo cassette/radio) used tantalums because of their compact size and wide temperature range. (AL types used to freeze...) They sound terrible as audio coupling caps, and invariably the smoke gets let out. (I've had several - -)
__________________
www.kta-hifi.net |
|
|
|
| Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|
|
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| snubber p.s. | wicho | Chip Amps | 11 | 21st October 2008 01:07 PM |
| Parallel vs. series filament supply - or another filament idea | engels | Tubes / Valves | 11 | 13th May 2007 01:06 PM |
| What has happened??? | shepperd | Everything Else | 0 | 17th November 2006 10:11 AM |
| Snubber AND non-snubber ? | jimbo1968 | Chip Amps | 10 | 6th December 2005 07:49 AM |
| Snubber | s2kov | Tubes / Valves | 13 | 30th November 2004 02:09 PM |
| New To Site? | Need Help? |
| Page generated in 0.11323 seconds (78.30% PHP - 21.70% MySQL) with 10 queries |