|
|
|||||||
| Home | Forums | Rules | Articles | Store | Gallery | Blogs | Register | Donations | FAQ | Calendar | Search | Today's Posts | Mark Forums Read | Search |
| Tubes / Valves All about our sweet vacuum tubes :) Threads about Musical Instrument Amps of all kinds should be in the Instruments & Amps forum |
| diyAudio Sponsor | ||
|
|
||
|
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|
#1 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Marietta/Moultrie GA
|
Ok. This was pointed out to me- the SAMS schematic for the Magnavox 196 SE EL84 integrated amp has a very strange depiction of the output transformer wiring.
In this drawing, it appears that the screen is wired to a primary tap... but in OPPOSITE polarity to a normal ultralinear arrangement. Now, by my use of basic math, that would make it POSITIVE feedback on the screen, as opposed to the degree of effective negative feedback that a normal ultralinear tap induces (compared to straight pentode mode) on the plate of the tube? Someone please tell me if I'm wrong... I've been claimed to be so, on the MagnavoxFriends Yahoo group, but I'm not at all convinced. Not when I can readily generate math that shows that my conclusion seems to be consistent with basic principles... I've attached a pic, showing an excerpt from the Magnavox 196 schematic, compared to an excerpt from a more normal ultralinear wiring scheme, for comparison. I'm convinced that the Sams schematic for the Magnavox 196 is just drawn wrong (which would be far from the first time THAT happened, FWIW)... someone please tell me if I'm off-base on this! Thanks! Regards, Gordon.
__________________
Speaker Design, Restoration and Repair- since 1985. |
|
|
|
|
#2 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: Macedon NY
|
Oh yes, the old hum-canceling connection. A small bit of the power supply ripple at the plate is fed to the screen in reverse phase, canceling it out. It was cheaper for a volume manufacturer to add a tap on the transformer than to add another electrolytic.
|
|
|
|
|
#3 | |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: Ann Arbor, MI
|
Quote:
What ratio is it? so to say, how close is the B+ connection to being a CT? If it is 10-15% I would be quite tempted to swap it and see how low ratio U-L works( or for that matter regrdless of the ratio ). cheers, Douglas
__________________
the Tnuctipun will return |
|
|
|
|
|
#4 | |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Nov 2005
|
Quote:
The 7 ohm DCR of that half of the coil suggests it's a pretty small %, given the 333 ohm DCR of the rest of the primary. |
|
|
|
| Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|
|
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| How to figure gain on split-load with positive feedback? | GordonW | Tubes / Valves | 4 | 21st May 2008 05:24 PM |
| Not a lot of Amps drawn, not what I expected! | iUSERTLO72p | Car Audio | 18 | 12th January 2008 08:49 PM |
| Modulated cascode and positive feedback? | Circlomanen | Pass Labs | 4 | 13th March 2006 01:14 PM |
| Positive feedback online issue #16 | Original Burnedfingers | Tubes / Valves | 0 | 22nd March 2005 11:25 AM |
| New To Site? | Need Help? |
| Page generated in 0.07664 seconds (74.71% PHP - 25.29% MySQL) with 11 queries |